Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7181 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1944
OP (MAC) NO. 54 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OPMV 288/2018 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
TRIBUNAL-II, PALAKKAD
PETITIONER:
BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCE CO.LTD
M/S BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD, 1ST FLOOR,
MANGALAM TOWERS
OPP.TOWN BUS STAND , T.B ROAD, PALAKKAD
REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR LEGAL EXECUTIVE
REGIONAL OFFICE , 3RD FLOOR , COSTAL CHAMBERS
OPPOSITE MERCY ESTATE , RAVIPURAM, COCHIN, PIN - 678014
BY ADV LAL GEORGE
RESPONDENTS:
1 SUBRAMANIAN. K
AGED 63 YEARS
S/O KUNCHUVELLA , VATTEKATTUKULAMBU
THATHAMANGALAM , CHITTUR
PALAKKAD , KERALA, PIN - 678102
2 BALAKRISHNAN .J
S/O JANARDHANAN , 7/376 , MUTHUKAD
KINASSERY, PALAKKAD , PIN - 678701
3 KAJA HUSSAIN.V
S/O ABDUL VAHAB , ANAPPURAMKMADU
KINASSERY , PALAKKAD, PIN - 678701
BY ADVS.
Baby Mathew
MUHAMMED RIYAS A.T.(K/000711/2022)
THIS OP (MAC) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.06.2022, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(MAC) NO. 54 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner herein who is the 3rd respondent in
OP(MV)No.288/2018 on the files of the Motor Accidents
Claims Tribunal, Palakkad has preferred this OP(MAC)
aggrieved by Ext.P6 and Ext.P8 orders passed by the
Tribunal. As per Ext.P5 order, the application
submitted by the petitioner herein to refer the claim
petitioner to State Medical Board to assess his disability
was dismissed. Ext.P8 is the order passed by the
Tribunal rejecting the application of the petitioner to
summon the Doctors of the Medical Board and to
produce calculation sheet along with the records
pertaining to disability of the claim petitioner. This
Court by order dated 30.05.2022 had stayed further
proceedings in OP(MV)No.288/2018 on the files of the
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The accident is of the year 2017. According
to the learned counsel for the petitioner/insurer
without a calculation statement Ext.C1 medical
certificate produced before the Tribunal cannot be
relied upon since that does not reflect the actual
disability of the claimant. The Tribunal found that it is
not necessary either to examine the Doctors to assess
the disability or to call for the calculation statement
accompanying the medical certificate and rejected the
petition. Going through the impugned orders, I find
that the finding of the Tribunal in Ext.P6 cannot be
found fault with. However, in view of the apprehension
expressed by the insurer, it will be open to the
petitioner/insurer to make necessary application before
the Tribunal to examine one of the Doctors of the
Medical Board who issued Ext.C1 certificate. Such an
application shall be made within a period of two weeks
from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The Tribunal shall consider such application
expeditiously and pass appropriate orders thereon.
The Original Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE AJ
APPENDIX OF OP (MAC) 54/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CLAIM PETITION O.P (M.V) NO 288/2018 ON THE FILE OF MACT PALAKKAD
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WOUND CERTIFICATE DATED 5.8.2017 ISSUED CRIMINAL CERTIFICATE
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE CARD
Exhibit P4 RELEVANT PORTION OF MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY SPECIAL MEDICAL BOARD
Exhibit P5 AFFIDAVIT
Exhibit P5 A PETITION TO REFER THE PETITIONER(CLAIMANT) TO THE STATE MEDICAL BOARD TO ACCESS THE DISABILITY
Exhibit P6 ORDER OF IA 3524/21 IN OPMV 288/2018 DATED 27/1/2022
Exhibit P7 AFFIDAVIT IN IA 767/22 IN OPMV 288/2018
Exhibit P7 A PETITION IA 767/22 IN OPMV 288/2018
Exhibit P8 ORDER IN IA 767/22 IN OPMV 288/2018
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!