Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7019 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 27TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 27400 OF 2015
PETITIONER/S:
MOIDEEN KUTTY, S/O.BAVA
AGED 60 YEARS
PUTHUSSERY HOUSE, CHIRAKKAL, POST TANUR, TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
SMT.ANJALI G.KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM
COLLECTORATE, POST MALAPPURAM, PIN-676 505.
2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, POST TIRUR,
MALAPPURAM, PIN-676 101.
3 THE TAHSILDAR
TALUK OFFICE, POST TIRUR, MALAPPURAM, PIN-676 101.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
PARIYAPURAM VILLAGE, POST TANUR, MALAPPURAM, PIN-676 302.
5 TANUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH
POST TANUR,TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM, PIN-676 302,
REPRESENTED BUY ITS SECRETARY.
6 THE SECRETARY
TANUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, POST TANUR,TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM, PIN-676 302.
BY ADVS.
R5 & R6 BY SRI.HARISH R. MENON
SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR
R1 TO 4 - SRI.ARAVIND.V.MATHEW, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17.06.2022,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No. 27400/2015 :2:
Dated this the 17th day of June, 2022.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking the following
reliefs:
1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 5 th respondent Grama Panchayat to take necessary and immediate steps to construct the way as per Ext. P1 report of the 3rd respondent within a time stipulated by this Hon'be Court.
2. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 5 th respondent Grama Panchayat to take necessary and immediate steps to implement Ext. P4 and Ext. P7 orders of the Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institutions, Thiruvananthapuram.
3. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P12 representation filed by the petitioner.
2. However, today, when the matter is taken up for
consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the writ petition has become infrucutous.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
sd/ SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.
Rv
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!