Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6776 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2022
TR.P(C) NO. 710 OF 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 24TH JYAISHTA, 1944
TR.P(C) NO. 710 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 1323/2020 OF FAMILY COURT,
MAVELIKKARA
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
VIDYA,
AGED 21 YEARS,
D/O. VIKRAMAN PILLAI, VISHNU BHAVANAM, PUTHENPURAKKAL,
MEENATH CHERI, KAVANAD P.O, KOLLAM - 691003.
BY ADVS.
C.R.JAYAKUMAR
NOBEL RAJU
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
ARUN RAJ, AGED 29 YEARS,
S/O. RAJENDRAN PILLAI, PRASANTHY BHAVAN, CHUNAKKARA
VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK, CHARUMMOODU P.O, ALAPPUZHA
- 690505.
THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 14.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
TR.P(C) NO. 710 OF 2021
2
ORDER
The transfer petition is filed under Sec.24 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, seeking to transfer O.P 1323/2020 (Annexure
A1) from the Family Court, Mavelikara to the Family Court,
Kollam.
2. The petitioner's case, in brief, in the memorandum
of transfer petition is that, she is the wife of the respondent.
Due to the matrimonial cruelty meted out on the petitioner,
she was constrained to live in her parental home. The
respondent has filed Annexure A1 before the Family Court,
Mavelikara seeking a decree of divorce. There is no person
to chaperone the petitioner from Kollam to Mavelikara to
contest Annexure A1. On the other hand, no inconvenience
would be caused to the respondent in ordering the transfer of
the case. Hence the transfer petition.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner. Even though notice has been served on the
respondent, there is no appearance for him. TR.P(C) NO. 710 OF 2021
4. The law with respect to transfer of proceedings,
particularly matrimonial disputes, is no longer res-integra, in
view of the categoric declaration of law by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Sumitha Sing V. Kumar Sanjay and
another [2002 KHC 1889], Mona Aresh Goel V. Aresh
Satya Goel [2000 KHC 1835], Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap V.
Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap [2016 KHC 6489] and
Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh [2017 (5) KHC 48]. The
Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that it is the convenience of
the woman and children that has to be looked into, while
ordering the transfer of a case from one Court to another.
5. In the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the aforecited decisions, the
uncontroverted pleadings and materials on record and in
the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this
Court under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and
allow the transfer petition.
TR.P(C) NO. 710 OF 2021
In the result, I allow the transfer petition by ordering
the transfer of O.P No.1323/2020 from the Family Court,
Mavelikara to the Family Court, Kollam. The Registry shall
forward a copy of this order to the Family Court, Mavelikara
with instructions to forthwith transmit the records in
Annexure A1 to the Family Court, Kollam. The Family Court,
Kollam shall immediately on the receipt of the records in
Annexure-A1, issue notice to the parties for their appearance.
ma/14.6.2022 Sd/-C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
TR.P(C) NO. 710 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF TR.P(C) 710/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN OP NO.
1323/2020 ON THE FILES OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA.
Annexure A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE LOCAL REGISTRAR THAZHAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT DATED 13.03.2018.
Annexure A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE CHARGE OFFICER, SAKTHIKULANGARA ZONAL OFFICE, KOLLAM CORPORATION DATED 03.01.2020.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!