Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6569 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 19TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(CRL.) NO. 140 OF 2021
PETITIONERS:
1 ASOKAN A.S
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O. SUBRAN, AINIKADAN HOUSE,
MURINGOOR, CHALAKKUDY,
THRISSUR-680 307
2 SUSEELA,
AGED 54 YEARS
D/O. JANAKI, AINIKADAN HOUSE,
MURINGOOR, CHALAKKUDY,
THRISSUR 680 307.
3 BIJU,
AGED 43 YEARS
S/O. SHAJI, PULLARKAD HOUSE,
KARIYAD, NEDUMBASSERY,
ERNAKULAM-683 583
BY ADVS.R.KRISHNA RAJ
E.S.SONI
KUMARI SANGEETHA S.NAIR
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRTARY TO GOVERNMENT,
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRES,
NEW DELHI-110 001
2 EMBASSY OF INDIA,
MUSCAT-OMAN,
REPRESENTED BY ITS AMBASSADOR,
JAMI' AT AL-DOWAL AL-ARABIYA STREET,
DIPLOMATIC AREA,
AL KHUWAIR,
P.O. BOX 1727, PC 112.
W.P(Crl) No.140/2021
- 2 -
3 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (STATE POLICE CHIEF),
POLICE HEADQUARTERS,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004
4 ASWATHY,
AGED 36 YEARS
W/O.BIJU,
RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.11,
1ST FLOOR, BUILDING NO.7889,
NEAR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT OMAN BUILDING,
AL-KODH-6, MUSCAT-OMAN.
* ADDL. R5 IS IMPLEADED
5 THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS,
INTERNAL SECURITY II DIVISION,
II FLOOR,
MAJOR DHYAN CHAND NATIONAL STADIUM,
NEW DELHI-110 001.
* IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL. R5 VIDE ORDER DATED 30/06/2021
IN W.P.(CRL.)NO. 140/2021.
R1 & R2 BY SRI. P.VIJAYAKUMAR, SCGC
SRI.K.SHRI HARI RAO, CGC
R3 BY SRI.P.NARAYANAN, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
09.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P(Crl) No.140/2021
- 3 -
JUDGMENT
Vinod Chandran, J.
The grievance of the third petitioner is that his
minor child is in the illegal custody of the fourth
respondent mother. Admittedly, the fourth respondent
with the child was residing in Muscat and it is also
alleged that the wife has converted to Islam and has
illicit relationship with a Pakistani.
2. We issued notice, however, the same was returned
undelivered, citing the reason that the address is not
clear. The attempt of the Embassy to contact the fourth
respondent over the mobile phone number supplied by the
petitioners has also failed. The child admittedly is in
the custody of the mother and we cannot find any illegal
custody or forceful detention by the mother. The issue
is of custody of the child which the petitioners will W.P(Crl) No.140/2021
- 4 -
have to agitate before the appropriate court. No writ of
habeas corpus will issue.
The writ petition will stand closed, leaving open the
remedies available to the petitioners to agitate the
custody issue.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge
Sd/-
C.JAYACHANDRAN, Judge
DCS/08/06/2022 W.P(Crl) No.140/2021
- 5 -
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1 COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE
Exhibit P2 COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS
Exhibit P3 COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS
Exhibit P4 COPY OF THE COMPLAINANT FILED BY THE THIRD PETITIONER BEFORE THE INDIAN EMBASSY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!