Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6471 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 18TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 34885 OF 2019
PETITIONER:
P.S.DINILKUMAR
AGED 46 YEARS
S/O. N.SUKUMARAN, ACCOUNTANT (NOW TERMINATED FROM THE SERVICE),
KAYIPPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.1300,MUHAMMA P.O.,
CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 525, RESIDING AT PUTHVAL VEEDU,
KAYIPPURAM, MUHAMMA P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 525
BY ADVS.
P.B.SAHASRANAMAN
SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 KAYIPPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 1300
MUHAMMA.P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 525,REP BY ITS PRESIDENT
2 THE CHAIRMAN,
DISCIPLINARY SUB COMMITTEE,KAYIPPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
LTD NO.1300,MUHAMMA P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 525,
BY ADVS.
SRI.J.OM PRAKASH
SRI.T.G.SUNIL (PRANAVAM)
SRI.C.X.ANTONY BENEDICT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.06.2022,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 34885 OF 2019
2
JUDGMENT
Even though there are various assertions, allegations and
averments made and urged in this writ petition, when this matter
was called today, after arguing for some time, Sri. P.B.Sahasranaman
- the petitioner's learned counsel, confined his plea that the
statutory Appeal preferred by his client on 11.12.2019 and pending
before the 2nd respondent - Managing Committee of the Society, be
directed to be taken up and disposed within a time frame to be fixed
by this Court.
2. Sri.J.Om Prakash - learned counsel appearing for the
respondents, did not oppose this plea and he affirmed that the afore
appeal has been received by his client; however, praying that this
Court may not make any affirmative declarations in favour of the
petitioner and leave it to the competent Authority to decide the
appeal on its merits as per law.
Taking note of the afore submissions, I order this writ petition
to the limited extent of directing the 2 nd respondent to take up the
aforementioned appeal and dispose of the same, after affording an
opportunity of being heard to the petitioner; thus culminating in an
appropriate order and necessary action thereon, as expeditiously as is
possible but not later than one month from the date of receipt of a WP(C) NO. 34885 OF 2019
copy of this judgment.
Needless to say, all the rival contentions of the parties are left
open to be pursued by them appropriately during the afore exercise;
and I further clarify that this Court has not entered into its merits in
any manner whatsoever.
SD/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE rp WP(C) NO. 34885 OF 2019
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 34885/2019
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER, DATED 17.05.2018
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER OF SUSPENSION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT, DATED 28.05.2018
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE MEMO OF CHARGES ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE, DATED 09.07.2018
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 11.07.2018
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT,DATED 15.11.2019
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS, DATED 16.11.2019
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 20.11.2019
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER OF TERMINATION ISSUED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SUB COMMITTEE FOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS DATED 23.11.2019
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!