Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Charlie Cherian vs The Registrar Of Companies
2022 Latest Caselaw 938 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 938 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2022

Kerala High Court
Charlie Cherian vs The Registrar Of Companies on 25 January, 2022
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
         TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 5TH MAGHA, 1943
                         WP(C) NO. 1835 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:

     1       CHARLIE CHERIAN
             AGED 50 YEARS
             S/O CHERIAN A, ARAPURAIKKAL, MALAKKARA ROAD,
             MALAKKARA P.O.ARANMULA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT -689 532
     2       PHILIP CHACKO,
             PUTHENPARAMBIL HOUSE, VAKAYAR P.O.,
             PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT
             BY ADVS.
             K.M.ANEESH
             K.SANTHOSH KUMAR (KALIYANAM)
             ADARSH KUMAR
             BIJU VARGHESE ABRAHAM
             DILEEP CHANDRAN
             SHASHANK DEVAN


RESPONDENTS:

     1       THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
             KERALA, BMC ROAD, THRIKKAKARA P.O.KAKKANAD,
             KOCHI,
             KERALA-682 021
     2       THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR,
             MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, SHASTRI BHAVAN,
             HADDOWS ROAD, NUNGUMBAKKOM, CHENNAI-60006.
     3       UNION OF INDIA,
             REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
             MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, A WING SHASTRI BHAVAN,
             DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 001

             SRI.S.MANU- ASGI
     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 1835 OF 2022               2




                             JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25th day of January, 2022

The petitioners are before this Court seeking to direct the

respondents to restore and reactivate the Director Identification

Number of the petitioners (06878336 and 06878368) and their

Digital Signature Certificates so as to enable the petitioners to

file the statutory returns and statements before the authorities

as per law and to represent those Companies as their Director

without any interruption.

2. The petitioners state that they are shareholders and

Directors on the Board of M/s.Tak Natural and Organic

Ingrediants Exim Private Limited. The petitioners when

attempted to use the Digital Signature Certificates along with

their respective DIN to file annual returns on the website of the

1st respondent, the petitioners received a message to the effect

that 'Director Disqualified'. Further, the DIN status of the

petitioners is also showing 'Disqualified by ROC under Section

164(2)'. From the website, the petitioners learnt that they were

disqualified as Directors from 01.11.2018 to 31.10.2023.

3. The petitioners submit that in view of the

disqualification and de-activation of DIN number, the

petitioners are not able to function or act as Directors on the

Board of any other Company or Limited Liability Partnership.

They are not in a position to upload necessary statutory returns

under the Companies Act, 2013. The de-activation of DIN is

illegal and unwarranted, contended the petitioners.

4. The learned Assistant Solicitor General of India

(ASGI) appeared on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. The learned

ASGI contested the writ petition and controverted all the

material averments contained in the writ petition. The learned

ASGI submitted that the petitioners were disqualified for

holding the office of Directors in Companies under Section

164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. Since they are disqualified,

their DIN numbers were de-activated. There is no illegality on

the de-activation of the DIN number.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

the learned ASGI representing the respondents.

6. This Court has considered the issue of de-activation

of DIN in the context of disqualification of Directors under

Section 164(2) of the Companies Act. This Court considered

the matter in Zacharia Maramkandathil Mohan v. Union of

India [2021 (4) KLT 493] and held that the DINs of the

petitioners allotted under Rule 10 of the Companies

(Appointments and Qualifications of Directors)Rules, 2014 are

not liable to be deactivated or cancelled solely for the reason

that the petitioners stand disqualified for

appointment/reappointment as Directors of Companies by

operation of Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. In

view of the law laid down by this Court in Zacharia

Maramkandathil Mohan (supra), the writ petition is liable to be

allowed.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed following

the judgment of this Court in Zacharia Maramkandathil

Mohan (supra) and consequently, the respondents are

directed to restore and re-activate the DIN numbers and Digital

Signature Certificates of the petitioners forthwith.

sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE hmh

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1835/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPANY MASTER DATA OF THE M/S TAK NATURAL AND ORGANIC INGREDIANTS EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED PUBLISHED IN THE WEBSITE OF THE MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE DIN STATUS PUBLISHED IN THE WEBSITE WWW.MCA.GOV. IN OF THE RESPONDENT NO 1 DEPICTING THE STATUS OF THE 1ST PETITIONER DIN Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE DIN STATUS PUBLISHED IN THE WEBSITE WWW.MCA.GOV.IN OF THE RESPONDENT NO 1 DEPICTING THE STATUS OF THE 2ND PETITIONERS DIN

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter