Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 679 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 24TH POUSHA, 1943
RFA NO. 480 OF 2006
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.05.2005 IN OS 150/2003 OF
SUB COURT, THALASSERY
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
CHAKKARAPPAYYAN KUNNATH VANAJA MOHANAN
W/O.MOHANAN, AGED 53 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, 'VANAMALA',
P.O.PALLIKKUNNU,, KANNUR-670004.
BY ADV SRI.C.K.SREEJITH
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1 KOCHIPEEDIKAYIL KASIM
S/O.ABDUL RAHMAN, AGED 53 YEARS,, BUSINESS,
"SHABINA COTTAGE", KANNOOKKARA, THANA, KANNUR-670 012.
2 VALIYA THANAL AYISHA
D/O.ABDULLA HAJI, AGED 47 YEARS,
OCCUPATION NIL, 'SHABINA COTTAGE',
KANNOOKKARA, THANA, KANNUR-670 012.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH)
SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON
14.01.2022, ALONG WITH RFA.45/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA Nos.480/2006 & 45/2007
2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 24TH POUSHA, 1943
RFA NO. 45 OF 2007
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.05.2005 IN OS 148/2003
OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THALASSERY
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
CHAKKARAPPAYYAN KUNNATH VANAJA MOHANAN
W/O.MOHANAN, AGED 53 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE,
"VANAMALA", P.O.PALLIKKUNNU, KANNUR-670 004.
BY ADV SRI.C.K.SREEJITH
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1 M.SAMUEL JACOB, S/O. CHACKO SAMUEL,
AGED 66 YEARS, BUSINESS, MATTAKKAL HOUSE,
P.O. KOYIPPURAM, VIA, CHENGANNUR.
2 ALICE JACOB, D/O.VARGHESE, AGED 60
YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, MATTAKKAL HOUSE, P.O. KOYIPPURAM,
VIA CHENGANNUR,
BOTH PLAINTIFFS THROUGH THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY
HOLDER KOCHIPPEDIKAYIL KASIM, S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN,
AGED 53 YEARS, BUSINESS, SHABINA COTTAGE, THANA,
KANNOOKKARA,KANNUR-12.
BY ADVS.
SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH
SRI.K.R.AVINASH KUNNATH
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON
14.01.2022, ALONG WITH RFA.480/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA Nos.480/2006 & 45/2007
3
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant fairly
submitted that the matter is settled out of Court
and as such, there is no necessity to proceed
further in the matter. Submission is recorded. In
view of the settlement arrived at out of court,
there will be a direction to refund the entire
court fee to the respective appellant in view of
legal position settled by the Apex Court in The
High Court Of Judicature at Madras rep. by its
Registrar General v. M.C. Subramaniam and Others
[2021 (2) KHC 62 : 2021 KHC OnLine 6080 : ILR 2021
(1) Ker.956 : 2021 (2) KLT SN 25 : 2021 (3) SCC
560].
Both the Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE SPV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!