Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 468 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 23RD POUSHA, 1943
RP NO. 41 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 5870/2020 OF HIGH COURT
OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
1 C.J'S HARITHA HOMES
SQUARE CENTRE, ATHIRAMPUZHA PO., PADINJATTUMBHAGAM
KARA, ATHIRAMPUZHA VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM-686562.
2 KUMAR.D.,
MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.C.JS HARITHA HOMES, SQUARE
CENTRE, ATHIRAMPUZHA PO., PADINJATTUMBHAGAM KARA,
ATHIRAMPUZHA VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM-686562.
3 SHEEJA S. KUMAR,
PARTNER, M/S.C.JS HARITHA HOMES, SQUARE CENTRE,
ATHIRAMPUZHA PO., PADINJATTUMBHAGAM KARA,
ATHIRAMPUZHA VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM-686562.
BY ADVS.
MATHEW JOHN (K)
ABY J AUGUSTINE
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 SRI. C.R.SURESH
S/O.RAGHAVAN, CHIRAYIL HOUSE, KOTTAYAM.P.O.,
PANAYAKAZHIPPU KARA, MUTTAMBALAM VILLAGE,
KOTTAYAM-686001.
2 THE KERALA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
(LEGAL), SWARAJ BHAVAN, 5TH FLOOR, NANDANCODE,
KOWDIYAR.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.C.S.MANILAL FOR RESPONDENT,
SRI.C.M.NAZAR FOR R2
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 13.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
RP No.41/2022
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
--------------------------------
R.P.No.41 of 2022
in
W.P(C). No.5870 of 2020
----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 13th day of January, 2022
ORDER
This review petition is filed seeking an order to review
the judgment dated 07.12.2021 in W.P.(C). No.5870 of 2020.
According to the petitioners, the judgment sought to be
reviewed happened to pass because of the fact that neither the
petitioners nor their counsel was aware of Section 43(5) of the
Real Estate (Regulations and Developments) Act, 2016 by
which pre-deposit of the amount is necessary. The learned
counsel for the petitioners takes me through Rule 37(2)(e) of
the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2018 and
also takes me through Ext.P2 notice and Ext.P6 order passed
by the authority. Exts.P2 and P6 are on the same day. The
above point is not considered by this Court while passing the
judgment.
RP No.41/2022
2. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of
the case and also in the light of the submission by the learned
counsel for the petitioners that it is a mistake committed by
him while arguing the writ petition, I think, in the interest of
justice, the review petition can be allowed and the judgment
passed in the writ petition can be recalled.
Therefore, the review petition is allowed and the
judgment dated 07.12.2021 in W.P.(C). No.5870 of 2020 is
recalled.
Issue a copy of this order today itself.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JV JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!