Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 431 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 23RD POUSHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 29370 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
ABDUL SALAM, AGED 69 YEARS
S/O LATE MOHAMMED RAVUTHAR, ABDUL HOUSE, ATHIKODE,
KOZHINJAMPARA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 555
P.JAYARAM
GIGI PAPPACHAN
K.R.PAUL
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD-678 001
2 THE TAHSILDAR,(LAND RECORDS),
CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 101
3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
KOZHINJAMPARA VILLAGE OFFICE, KOZHINJAMPARA P.O.
PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 555
4 THE ASST ENGINEER,
PWD ROADS, P.O.KOZHINJAMPARA, PALAKKAD DISTICT-678 555.
5 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001
GP - MABLE C KURIAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 29370 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner alleges that he has been issued with
Ext.P1 notice under the provisions of the Kerala Land
Conservancy Rules, without having been issued with any
earlier notices under Forms A and B of the said Act which is a
mandatory prerequisite. The petitioner, therefore, prays that
Ext.P1 be set aside.
2. However, in response, the learned Government
Pleader, Smt.Mable C.Kurian, submitted that the afore
assertions of the petitioner made by his learned counsel
Sri.P.Jayaram are not accurate because Form B notice was
issued to him on 17.02.2020 and that since the petitioner did
not respond to the same, Ext.P1 notice under Form C had
been issued. She, therefore, prayed that this writ petition be
dismissed.
3. Since, from the above, it is evident that the parties are
severely in dispute as to whether Form A and Form B notices
were earlier issued to the petitioner, I am certain that the
petitioner must be given opportunity of filing objections
against Ext.P1 before the competent Authority, so that the
matter can be then considered in terms of law, after hearing WP(C) NO. 29370 OF 2021
him also.
4. Resultantly, I allow this writ petition, leaving liberty to
the petitioner to file objections against Ext.P1 before the
second respondent - Tahsildar; and if this is done within a
period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment, the said Authority will hear the petitioner and
favour him with copies of Forms A and B notices, stated to
have been issued to him in the past and then complete
proceedings thereon, as expeditiously as is possible, but not
later than three months therefrom.
Needless to say, until such time as the afore exercise is
completed and the resultant order communicated to the
petitioner, all further action pursuant to Ext.P1 will stand
deferred.
Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE stu WP(C) NO. 29370 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29370/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE EVICTION NOTICE DATED 2.12.2021 FI-2020/1173/9/200 L.C.8/2020, ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS BY THE TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS) CHITTUR UNDER RULE 11 OF THE LAND CONSERVANCY RULES
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ACCOUNT MAINTAINED AT VILLAGE OFFICE, KOZHINJAMPARA ABOUT THE PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF THE PORAMBOKE LANDS SHOWING PETITIONER'S FATHER, MOHAMMED RAWUTHAR, AS ONE OF THE PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF THE PORAMBOKE LAND UNDER LC
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 13.2.1964 ISSUED FROM KOZHINJAMPARA VILLAGE OFFICE TO PETITIONER'S FATHER, MOHAMMED RAWUTHAR, WITH RESPECT TO THE LAND CONSERVANCY ACCOUNT LC
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PERSONAL DEPOSIT REGISTER MAINTAINED AT KSEB, VELAMTHAVALAM SHOWING ELECTRICITY CONNECTION DATED 25.1.1971 IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER TO THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTED AT THE PORAMBOKE LAND
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT DATED 18.3.1971 ISSUED IN THE NAME OF PETITIONER'S FATHER, MOHAMMED RAWUTHAR, WITH RESPECT TO THE BUILDING ERECTED AT THE PORAMBOKE LAND
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 22.11.2019 SUBMITTED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOZHINJAMPARA TO THE TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS) CHITTUR REFERRING TO THE ACTUAL POSSESSION OF THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS OVER THE PROPERTY BEARING BLOCK NO 36, RE-SURVEY NO 430(OLD SURVEY NO 638) SITUATED IN KOZHINJAMPARA VILLAGE
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSIGNMENT REPORT PREPARED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOZHINJAMPARA WP(C) NO. 29370 OF 2021
REFERRING TO THE ACTUAL POSSESSION OF THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS FOR THE LAST MORE THAN 50 YEARS OVER THE PROPERTY BEARING BLOCK NO 36, RE-SURVEY NO 430 (OLD SURVEY NO 638) SITUATED IN KOZHINJAMPARA VILLAGE.
Exhibit P8 CHECK LIST PREPARED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOZHINJAMPARA WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE LAND SHOWING ACTUAL POSSESSION OF THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS FOR THE LAST MORE THAN 50 YEARS OVER THE PROPERTY BEARING BLOCK NO 36, RE-SURVEY NO.430 (OLD SURVEY NO 638) SITUATED IN KOZHINJAMPARA VILLAGE
Exhibit P9 PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE LAND ON WHICH THE EVICTION NOTICE IS NOW ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER LAND CONSERVANCY RULES
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!