Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 197 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 21ST POUSHA, 1943
OP(C) NO. 49 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 45/2020 OF SUB
COURT,KOTTARAKKARA
PETITIONER/5TH DEFENDENT:
RANI [email protected] RANI KRISHNA,
AGED 43 YEARS
D/O.A.R.MEENAKSHI AMMA,
KRISHNANJANAM, KUNNIKODU P.O.,
VILAKKUDY VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK,
PIN-691 508.
BY ADVS.
K.S.BHARATHAN
ALPHIN ANTONY
AADITHYAN S.MANNALI
VISAKH ANTONY
ABEL ANTONY
CHRISTINE MATHEW
RANCE R.
RESPONDENTS/PLAINATIFF/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 4 AND 6:
1 T.L.LALITHAMBIKA,
AGED 76 YEARS
W/O.LATE BALAKRISHNA PILLAI,
KRISHNA VILASOM BUNGLOW,
AREEKKAL BHAGAM VENDAR, NEDUVATHOOR VILLAGE,
KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, PIN-691 507.
2 DR.M.R.BINDU,
AGED 52 YEARS
W/O.LATE K.B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
KRISHNA VILASOM BUNGLOW,
AREEKKAL BHAGAM VENDAR, NEDUVATHOOR VILLAGE,
KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, PIN-691 507.
3 GAUTHAM KRISHNA,
AGED 22 YEARS
S/O.LATE K.B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
KRISHNA VILASOM BUNGLOW,
AREEKKAL BHAGAM VENDAR, NEDUVATHOOR VILLAGE,
KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, PIN-691 507.
OP(C) NO.49 OF 2022
2
4 HRIDIK KRISHNA,
AGED 18 YEARS
S/O.LATE K.B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
KRISHNA VILASOM BUNGLOW,
AREEKKAL BHAGAM VENDAR, NEDUVATHOOR VILLAGE,
KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, PIN-691 507.
5 A.R.MEENAKSHI AMMA,
AGED 73 YEARS
W/O.REGUNATHA PANICKR,
KRISHNANJANAM, KUNNIKODU P.O.,
VILAKKUDY VILLAGE,
PATHANAPURAM TALUK, PIN-691 508.
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(C) NO.49 OF 2022
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of January, 2022
The petitioner, who is the 5th defendant in O.S.No.45/2020, is
aggrieved since the Sub Court, Kottarakara not granted time to file
written statement though a specific application has been filed
seeking time to file a written submission. Aggrieved by the non-
consideration of Ext.P2, the petitioner filed this original petition
under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. Heard on admission.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner
that in the petition also, the petitioner not disclosed what is the
period which the defendant required to file the written statement.
When the learned counsel was asked how much time the petitioner
wants to file written statement, the learned counsel sought for
three months time.
4. Admittedly, as submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner, summons in this case was received during January,
2021. Now one year period already had been elapsed. Thus, it
appears that the statutory period mandated by the Code of Civil
Procedure has been elapsed much earlier. However, in the interest OP(C) NO.49 OF 2022
of justice, I am inclined to grant 45 days time from today to the
petitioner to file the written statement. No further extension will be
granted.
Registry is directed to forward a copy of this judgment to the
trial court within seven days for information.
The Original Petition (Civil) stands disposed of.
Sd/-
A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr OP(C) NO.49 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF OP(C) 49/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.45/2020 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, KOTTARAKKARA DATED 12.11.2020 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION ALONG WITH THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 08.12.2021 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF SUB COURT, KOTTARAKKARA DATED 08.12.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!