Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 187 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 21ST POUSHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 30384 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
LAGHU UDYOGH BHARATHI-KERALAM,
STATE OFFICE, 16/79-J,
BEHIND SPWHS THAIKKATUKARA P.O., ALUVA-683 106,
REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY,
P.S.RAJESH, AGED 47 YEARS,
S/O. P.SANKARAN NAIR, GEETHAVILASAM,
KOTTAMAM, NEELESWARAM P.O.,
KALADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 574.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.G.SURESH
SRI.ASWATHY KRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
2 THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
KERALA BUREAU OF INDUSTRIAL PROMOTION,
NO.2, VIDHYA NAGAR P.O., OPP. POLICE GROUND,
THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.
SRI.P.SANTHOSHKUMAR, SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER
(INDUSTRIES)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.30384/2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of January, 2022
The petitioner is an Organisation working for the
development of MSME Sector from 1994 and having its
registered office in Maharashtra. The petitioner is the Kerala
Chapter of the said Organisation.
2. The 1st respondent issued a Government Order
dated 01.09.2021, constituting a Commerce Mission with the
purpose of promoting economic growth, enhance export
sector, sustainable development in the commerce sector and
to catch national and international markets for the products of
MSMEs from the State.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner
has not been included in the "Commerce Mission" constituted
as per Ext.P2. The petitioner, therefore, seeks appropriate WP(C).No.30384/2021
directions from this Court to include the petitioner also in the
Commerce Mission.
4. The learned Special Government Pleader
(Industries) entered appearance and submitted that the
respondents have received Ext.P3 representation from the
petitioner and the writ petition can be disposed of directing the
2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation.
In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of
directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation
submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders
thereon, in the ensuing meeting of the 1st respondent.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH JUDGE SR WP(C).No.30384/2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 30384/2021
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SUGGESTIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 13.7.2021.
Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O.(RT) NO.935/2021/1D ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 1.9.2021.
Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 14.9.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!