Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 125 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE llTH DAY 0F JANUARY 2022 / 21ST POUSHA, 1943
As NO. 269 OF zro03
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED ®5.1®.20®2 IN OS 89/1996 0F
SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT NO.1 :
RAMAN
S/O. LATE CHUZHALIYIL VELU,
THRIKKIDEERI AMSOM,
KUTTIKODE DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
P.G. PARAMESWAIIA PANICKER (SR. )
SAl\lTHEEP ANKARATH
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIF=FS AND DEFENDAI\lTS NO.3 T012:
PARU D/O. LATE CHUZHALIYIL VELU, RESIDING AT PARANGOTTIL HOUSE PERUR AMSOM, ARALUR DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK.
PADMAVATHY D/O. LATE CHUZHALIYIL VELU, RESIDING AT PULII(KAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ADAKKAPUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. (DIED) (LRS IMPLEADED)
SAROJINI W/O. LATE CHUZHALIYIL VELU 'S SON PARANGODAN.
MANIRANDAlu, S/O. LATE CHUZHALIYIL PARANGODAN.
SAVITHRI, D/O. LATE PARANGODAN.
6 RAMAKRISHNAN AS NO. 269 0F 2003
S/0. LATE PARANGODAN.
SUBHADHRA, D/0. LATE PARANGODAN.
MADHAVI D/0.CHUZHALIYIL VELU,
KOMALAM, W/0 . NARAYANAN
1® SURESH S/0 . NARAYANAN
11 LATHA, D/O . NARAYANAN
12 PREETHA, D/O . NARAYANAN , (RESPONDENTS NO.3 T012 RESIDING AT THRIKKADEERI AMSOM, KUTTIKODE DESOM IN 0TTAPALAM TALUK. )
ADDL.13 VELUKUTTY, S/O. LATE PADMAVATHY, AGED 46 YEARS, PULIKRAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ADAKRAPUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, OTTAPLAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN- 679503.
ADDL.14 VIJAYAN S/O . LATE PADMAVATHY, AGED 43 YEARS, PULIKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ADAKKAPUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, OTTAPLAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-679503.
ADDL.15 SUDHA D/O. LATE PADMAVATHY, AGED 48 YEARS, PULIKRAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ADAKKAPUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, AS NO. 269 0F 2003
0TTAPLAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN- 679503.
(LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE 0F DECEASED 2ND RESPONDENT ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDTIONAL RESPONDENTS 13 T0 15 AS PER ORDER DATED
11.®1.2®22 IN IA.NO.2/2®21)
R1, ADDL.R13 T015 BY ADVS.
PREETl+Y IIARUNARARAN M.R.MINI MEENA . A .
R. RAJESH KORMATH V . S . ROBIN
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING 0N
11.®1.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING :
AS NO. 269 0F 2003
ELDGMENI
The matter is settled out of court between
the parties. The compromise arrived at by the
parties is hence accepted.
The Appeal is disposed of in accordance with
the compromise arrived at by the parties. The
compromise arrived at by the parties will form
part of the judgment and decree. Refund the
entire court fee in view of legal position settled by the Apex Court in 7lhe #jgh Court Of
Judicature at Hadras rep. by its Registrar General v. M.C. Subramaniam and Others t2®21 (2)
KHC 62 : 2021 KHC Online 6080 : ILR 2021 (1)
Ker.956 : 2021 (2) KLT SN 25 : 2021 (3) SCC
560] '
Sd/-
P . SOMARAJAN
JUDGE SPV BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
I.A. NO. 2021 In AS NO. 269 0F 2003
Against Judgment and decree in O.S. No. 89 of 1996 on the file of the c(#;?"r Subordinate Judge's Court, Ottapalam dated 5,10.2002
rl PETITIONEFl/ ADDellant:-
Raman, aged 70 years, S/o. late Chuzhaliyil Velu, Thrikkideeri P.O., Kuttikode desom, Ottapalam Taluk.
Vs.
RESPONDEN-rs/ Respondents:-
1. Pamu, D/o. Late Chuzhaliyil Velu, Residing at Parangottil House, Perur amsom, Akalur Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
rl 2. Padmavathy (died)
kofl.4LAN`L ee5jf252:9 _ PAN.4al` f ea)CIA &7 jupE6tl tr P42" . -u3rb q LAlr,A. ` L SAP_DJgN 2 ` _9L* ))REf7+/4` Pcr€et±+a qL m4MR4ND4W` GL `i! k`i v6LURATTY. JLJ£V2~ grfvl7+ip:i vz7Aval ~sOJf a 24m4k2zj#Jivdrty ` RAfuL~ 3uD,j4. "u`Tltr suBHfrDHp--+ ` LD9Er m4DH4vZ C2/ulLLG~7_
3. Sarojini, W/o. late Chuzhaliyil Parangodan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
4. Manikandan, S/o. late Chuzhaliyil Parangodan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
5. Savithrj, a D/o. late Parangodan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
6. Ramakrishnan, S/o. late Parangodan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
7. Subhadhra, D/o. late Parangodan, Thrjkkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom,
n Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
kom4L4tyi 1 ae'c}gr - i feAynfr` Q]c2ed dr ..!:,....
5LJPE£Hr
pA2." < r-)r\ q
L_ Air, 4 ` Let
i AP-C,I .a N`I `
p pe.a " ` Prrt4tLa fr
y\4N`ZkANDAN
j4vz7dfz 4fl
\/GLukdiY JJi-
vz]Ay4ri. cTul¢
¢„4k2zJ"ty`fu
3uDflADHPA` ha j c/D " 4 nd,ul.-Th
„„„ c2,[email protected]
8. Madhavi,
D/o. Late Chuzhaliyil Velu, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
9. Komalam, W/o. Narayanan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
10, Suresh, S/o. Narayanan, n Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
11. Latha, D/o. Narayanan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
12. Preetha, D/o. Narayanan, Thrikkadeeri amsom, Kuttikode Desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District.
rl PAmAy` ®)I 2irA \©r koN.4L4M. a®)c293© T==
pARLri -i,[email protected] 5up€3Ho hi 54„::::DAri=`G± L4fH4, ,,' tr ppg6TH4 , ``Prveedlco Q* 54vzTrip-Z ` ffty v£Lu^ufir` . _rL± 2„4k2.23„`4rf . aArfuL v8j4y4N`,c~riv{2ng suj3HADHR4` ky 5C,DnA ` mdLJ 14-
m4j)„4v? ` c2nuo`@L [email protected]~ LEGAL HElirs OF 2ND REsroNDENT:-
13. velukurty, S/o. late Padmavathy, aged 46 years, Pulikkaparambil House, Adakkaputhur amsom and desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District, Pin -679503.
14. Vijayan, S/o. late Padmavathy, aged 43 years, Pulikkaparambil House, Adakkaputhur amsom and desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District, rl Pin -679503.
15. Sudha, D/o, late Padmavathy, aged 48 years, Pulikkaparambil House, Adakkaputhur amsom and desom, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District, Pin - 679503.
JOINT COMPROMISE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PARTIE UNDER ORDER 23 RULE 3 0F THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDUIRE
1. The above appeal is preferred against the Judgment and 0 decree in O.S, No. 89 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Ottapalam dated 5.10.2002. The suit was filed by respondents 1
24m4„ ©/@ul`®H koiv`ALAM` G=&)C>-Ci4= L
pAPu. -"n` en\:
3Ap!oJZNr. ^C2Z339 ::::£4A Le~ 4Z~ f rrfu N -I k4 ^i D 4N , \`:_,
sAv2Th p9 ` F\3f ty ::;::uHT47`y P+eth# vzJArAti` . =\\`,,-:; I p4inAkRZ5HN4ul ` Put L5uB#4D£4 ` L4~ 3uDH4 ` cylbLj-~cra~ „4D04vz , c29ulall EL and 2 in the appeal namely Paru and Padmavathy for partition of the
plaint schedule properties. The suit was decreed and it was held that the plaintiffs are entitled 2 out of 6 shares. Defendants 1, 2 and 8 are entitled to 1 out of 6 shares each and defendants 3 to 7 were held to be entitled to 1 out of 6 shares.
2. Appeal is preferred by the lst defendant in the suit. Pending appeal 2nd respondent in the suit namely Padmavathy whose legal heirs impleadedasrespondents.../3,.'.?..T.e..8..tF
rt 3. Pending appeal the matter was discussed and deliberated through family members and common friends and parties have arrived at an amicable settlement. As per the settlement it has been decided as follows:-
1. It is decided that the properties available for partition as per settlement are only six in numbers.
2. 8th respondent in the appeal namely Madhavi who is the 8th defendant in the suit is entitled to exclusive title and
possession over the following properties:-
•p„4^;, ra;®rnd a~ ise-
rvIeDtdavi a,ul®1 gr pap.u ..-, a 6xp` 6n4::J::::DAN` Cys8 GL ::::£4H ftyL-
pp6€TH4 prcctL`~G3_
5Av27`riRZ \ 4L \,£LUKcf7" fuap;~
P4y)AIt223W¢N \ q2M+ vz3Ay4N c_ra#
5utgiv4J>ZJ24 ` b2~ 5cij>W4 nquIT JtL
#,i €&)C259L± =L
(A) 29.4 cents (0.1190 hectares) in Re-Survey No. 153/2 (88/2 old sy.) of Thrikkadeeri 11 Village in Ottapalam Taluk.
(8) 8.15 cents (0.0330 hectares) in the property named as Thara Palliyal which is situated in Re-survey No. 148/7 (old sy. 49/4 part) of Thrikkadeeri 11 Village.
3. plaintiffs namely Paru and Padmavathy had decided to join together and hence shares to be allotted to Paru and legal
r, heirs of deceased Padmavathy are kept commonly, Paru and Padmavathy are allotted the following properties with full ownership and possession:
A. 57 cents (0.2305 hectares) namely Valiyakandam (Vattamkandam) in Re-survey No. 152/15 (88/10) of Thrikkadeeri 11 Village.
a. 10 cents (0.0405 hectares) namely Chuzhaliyil Kudiyiruppa in Re-Survey No. 169/2 Pt (old Survey No. 90/4) of Thrikkadeeri 11 Village.
®
kc>m4LW €SitQ>92f T=
24M4ly` a, cbul .dr
p4Ac'. -)a &
5:::::;4riev# ::TP:4" , Zfty,er_
ppBE7`H4 Fir&th&fafLe
V6LUKulTy `
34v27r,jp`2. If
vzf^yAri.rselse
pALM4kp23HN4N RAM_
f"DW4 t mdu;~q8L`
GCJbF)4DHP4 L_
„4D+j4vz a)Luou`ap~
C. 11.60 cents (0.0470 hectares) namely Tharaparamba
in Re-Survey No. 151/8 (Old Sy. No. 87/28 Part) in Thrikkadeeri 11 Village.
4. Properties are described in more detail in the schedule attached to this compromise. It is also decided that apart from the aforementioned properties the remaining properties included in Partition Deed No. 163/1976 which is marked as Exhibit 87 will be retained, possessed and owned by the
rl parties to the documents in the same manner as alleged in the partition deed. It is also agreed that the lst plaintiff and legal heirs of the 2nd plaintiff to whom 11.60 cents of property in Re-Survey No. 151/8 (old Sy. No. 87/128) named Tharaparamb is set apart will not obstruct the appellant from using the 6ft. wide way on the western side of the said 11.60 cents lying in north -south direction leading from Tharakulam
pathway till the properties of the appellant.
24M4V' ©,at , car k`om4L4M tg®J92o`f= n ct-,, nc. Ggr 6upE3" EL-
p 4 P i, `
£4P=DJ Ziv 2 . L.4+F+A ` LQ~
|V\A }`r Z kA N ID4 N pp6€TH4 ` Per±-&
5A\,2Tf+pz,e~9~ \,6LUKUT`ryt-rtygL_ VZJAY4N , /P4m kp2G#jw~ -- P4nz;~
5Ltj3++`J)„¢4. L4in 5Ltj>H4 ` rviuo, Sky-
fr\4D n AIV 2 cislulqul&i,
iiE
5. Parties hereby agreed that the properties set apart to sharers have already been taken possession of the shares of the sharers to whom properties are allotted and they have no claim against each other. It is also agreed that there are no 'other properties kept in common between the parties except
five cents of property which is used as cremation ground. Parties have no claim each other henceforth.
6. It is also agreed that parties can apply for mutating the
r) properties allotted to their respective shares before revenue authorities or local authority and enjoy the properties as their Own.
Hence it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be
pleased to record the compromise and pass a decree in accordance with the compromise.
twiv)¢L4N` 8SS9C2923. `= 24„4„ `@;9wl tr p4tu` c-\rb ap\ 3;::: f f lzr±, n s4PJOJ2,rJ2 `
M.4NPK-4ND4N c pp€£ 7~ - fl+e4Lh^ C~
5Av27HP2 ` 9292= v£L„7„,.~ru\2~, i\nd,.a v2JAy4N ` R 4,nA kQ23f f NAN ` ptry / GUBH4DHP4 ` lrfu_ 6uJ)F,A ` Thul A cJlor-
M4Dr/Aiv2 ` a,[email protected]: Qz-
The contents of the statement were read over and explained to both the parties and both of them understood the same and statement is signed before the Advocates on both sides at Ernakulam on this the|q-Aay of /o€cemB€ngo21.
APPELLANT RESPONDENTS
RAMAN ` cai2)rv6` 82~ R1. PARU r-1 rtJR R3. SAROJINI r ,
R4. MANIKANDAN I/i-£1--.
n R5. SAVITHRI La:a±
R6. RAMAKRISHNAN P4pr1-
R7. SUBHADHRA I Lfty
R8. MADHAv[ , a,ulctll`gr
R9. KOMALj" ` cse,j>Qi 92JQ `r3L
R10. SURESH
-`grf Rii. LATHA S Lfro
Ri2. PREETHA pitcefroc=_ ® RL3. vELUKu" -frgr R14. VIJAYAN . •-.-T,".`+. Ll
R[5. SUDHA , "L^,.Tin
Signed before me:
:=epfa: ANKARATH REEEEii= COUNSEL FOR THE COUNSEL FOR THE A£Ei#2N2(ql RESPONDENTS e*ef 2i Gi besIN wvaAQ~puf ro tr<i®sQvh3 VILLAGE /:qHRIKKAI)EERI 11 BLOCK :57 RE.SY.NO :152/15 AREA : 0.2305cO CHNT :57
PARAMBATTUTHODI PARVATHY
VELLACHAL ¢AyIAvf i:23HriA/ c q~ LArTrJA P4N`qN,raDQ)di.cB-
• cJ )rb. g2. GOBF14Dl)P4 -`fty PPEETHA . qt±hfu` tr.
PAP-a
v£LUKu.7Ty.LTEL
m4j>H4\zZ . LgivnJl-fry
64PJOJr2rJ2 ` C335
v27AyArd\rINIINQr
N`4rl2k4ND4fy. C5)_
fc,in.4L~ , GQi.c2gro z~ 6#DH4 . rvThli)h~`4 6Avp7-i,R®L . oeEL 5ut.esH . fty VILLAGE :THRIKKADEERI II BLOCK :57 REl.SY.NO :151/8 pt n AREA : 0.0470(H) CENT :11.60
PATH WAY
21.9
CHUZHALIYIL RAMAN 24rtyMiv.®JQ]wl`&r #4rty..4keqL5»"4/ ` gAin+ L4rH4 z-
ha p4 A C, . -J ) ^c,, f&, €c^4;7;jDJ7?¢ I lEL ppGGC7H4 -Ffylefa/-A4. 4L
6Arpro72N7!. m4j„„ , fajulru-I . er \,€Lc,K„`7h7-y< _ipe~ Ir\4 N2 I-4N D 4 ftl LomqLon.G83)CA62±e=v2j-Ayat.q~=\Qr` 34v2THP-P. . A Sup,L6H f t~ 5uDl]4` r"u-EL /2-
VILLAGE :THRIKKADEERI II BLOCK :57 RE.SY.NO :169/2 pt AREA : 0.0405cO CENT : 10 a CHUZHALIYIL KANNAPPANUNNI
23.5
PATH WAY 44`TL}4 ` L± P-L4-MAN . G\)Qul 8}¥ P4m4KP25#"4„ c T2Agiv sL,Ohj4j>it„ Lef~ pp6E TH4 .pri2ddetr P4P_u ` Gu) Q` CBL 5A9P-ojltw.2 ` . QP9L m49,ty¢v2 . cafuca. GxpzL~ vGL4tKu77y. =EL n4N2y_4riD4ri -er `|co v.a L-4un ` efro 2 C±q29 Z~ vz3Arf yri -_st± s4vz7-»P2 . eg2: 6up`€3H ` f tyz¥ £tlDFj4 . ryndLul -. iAtry VILLAGE :TIIRIKKADEERI II BLOCK :57 RE.SY.NO :153/12 AREA :0.1190® CENT : 29.4
13Jl
¢4 N.a N :u;;yHiRAi#i#gr "4j,r74y2. G}julna.fry
P4,P-u
-u, r! . rd& p_Oiy`QL4m . eesqug2> =2~ £u P€£ f/ 34hoJ2N2 .
M4-N2P~4*D4f! L;:::7FJ4 . ,_±.
54V.,IT#P2 v£ Lct j<c/77 y ` ±j+2~ P4nc]Lp.zsi)N¢wl . r2A~ v2j4yal e _¥f a su3#QDHP4 ' (±2ir3zfa€ suDH4 ` "LJ3` ~£g-
' VILLAGE TTHRIKKADEERIII BLOCK :57
RE.SY.NO :148/7 AREA :0.0330® CHNT :8.15
KANAKKANATH RAMANKUTY rl
L,AITH4` E92-
24„" fD7G2ch-gr' &4n¥:pg„ R44~ pz.g€7H4` prfelrh g p4pu t r ~J'rtca ` GL,g+,4pbp4, E)L^DrJ 'r'' Lfz~ 4-
5A)foJ2NI. g±
„„„, La T<4oDmHo4LV4Z„ ::;f=9= Vvfz£,U4,t;4TY =#~
s4v"A„ 9z> 5"„ 2, 5uDp4 drjfty
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!