Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Sankaran Namboodiri vs The Commissioner And Others
2022 Latest Caselaw 121 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 121 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2022

Kerala High Court
K.Sankaran Namboodiri vs The Commissioner And Others on 7 January, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                          PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
                             &
         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
 FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 17TH POUSHA, 1943
                  WP(C) NO. 22556 OF 2010
PETITIONER:

          K.SANKARAN NAMBOODIRI
          S/O. K.VAMANAN NAMBOODIRI,
          KODALMANA ILLOM, P.O.NARIKKAMVALLY,
          VIA.MANDOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT.


          BY ADVS.
          SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER
          SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA


RESPONDENTS:

    1     THE COMMISSIONER,
          MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 001.
    2     THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
          MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, THALASSERY-670 701.
    3     EDAMANA VADHYAN KESAVAN NAMBOODIRI
          HEREDITARY TRUSTEE, ARATHIL SREE BHADRAPURAM
          TEMPLE, P.O.NAREEKKAMVALLI, KANNUR DISTRICT,
          PIN-670 501.
    4     O.K.PARAMESWARAN NAMBOODIRI
          HEREDITARY TRUSTEE, ARATHIL SREE BHADRAPURAM
          TEMPLE, P.O.NAREEKKAMVALLI, KANNUR DISTRICT,
          PIN-670 501.
                                2
W.P.(C) No.22556 of 2010


    5       P.NARAYANAN NAMBIAR
            EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SREE PAYYANNUR
            SUBRAMANYASWAMI TEMPLE, PAYYANNUR, KANNUR,
            PIN-670 307.
    6       THE MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD
            KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,
            PIN-673 001.
            BY ADVS.
            R1, R2 & R6 BY SRI.K.R.SUNIL, SC, MDB
            R1, R2 & R6 BY SMT.P.K.RADHIKA, SC, MDB
            R3 & R4 BY SRI.GOVIND K.BHARATHAN (SR)
            R3 & R4 BY RI.C.P.KUNJHIKANNAN
            R3 & R4 BY SRI.S.K.MADHU
            R5 BY SRI.K.V.SOHAN
            R5 BY SMT.SREEJA SOHAN.K.




        THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR FINAL
HEARING    ON   07.01.2022,   THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                   3
W.P.(C) No.22556 of 2010


                           JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition under Article

226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a writ of

certiorari or any other writ, direction or order quashing

Ext.P12 order.

2. On 20.07.2010, when this Writ Petition came up for

admission, the the Standing Counsel for Malabar Devaswom

Board took notice for respondents 2 and 6 and notice was

issued to others. This Court granted an interim stay for a

period of two months. The interim order was extended until

further orders.

3. Counter affidavits were filed by respondents 1 and

5.

4. On 01.02.2011 in I.A.No.16767 of 2010, this Court

passed the following order:

'The learned standing counsel for the Malabar Devaswom Board submits that from Ext.R1(i) it can be seen that because of the adamant attitude of the petitioner, the salary due to the employees of the

W.P.(C) No.22556 of 2010

temple is not being disbursed and because of the stay order, the Devaswom Board is unable to do anything in the matter. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time.'

5. The said order was followed by order dated

28.02.2011, which reads thus:

'This is an application filed by the respondents 1, 2 & 6 in the writ petition complaining the because of the interim order the employees of the Devaswom are not being paid salary and therefore in order to enable them to pay salary of the employees of Devaswom, the interim order may be vacated.

Heard both sides.

It is made clear that without removing the petitioner from the post of Managership, the respondents 1, 2 & 6 in the writ petition can take all appropriate steps to see that the employees of the Devaswom are paid their salaries.'

6. Today, when the case came up for consideration,

the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner does not want to prosecute this Writ Petition and,

hence, this Writ Petition may be dismissed as not pressed.

7. The learned Standing Counsel for the Malabar

W.P.(C) No.22556 of 2010

Devaswom Board would submit that the petitioner is no more

in service of Arathil Sree Bhadrapuram Temple.

Recording the aforesaid submissions, this Writ Petition is

dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE

Sd/-

P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE

dkr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter