Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1918 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 29TH MAGHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 5571 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
KHAMARUNNEESA, AGED 47 YEARS
W/O MUSTHAFA, D/O BEERAN KUTTY,
VELLLIYATHU HOUSE, TANALUR PO,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA,
PIN 676 307
BY ADV P.T.SHEEJISH
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), M SECTION,
COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM PO,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA 676 101
2
THE VILLAGE OFFICER, TANALUR VILLAGE,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN 676 307
SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY SR.G.P.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC 5571/22
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court asserting that a
suo motu proceedings, bearing S.M.No.89/2022, has been
initiated against her by the 1st respondent - Deputy Collector
(Land Reforms); and seeks that the same be directed to be
disposed of within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. In response, the learned Senior Government Pleader -
Smt.K.Amminikkutty, submitted that the afore mentioned suo
motu proceedings was initiated against the petitioner only
recently and therefore, that this writ petition is premature.
3. When I hear the learned Senior Government Pleader as
afore, it is without doubt this Court has been ordering suo motu
proceedings to be disposed of within a time frame. That said,
though this Court normally fixes eighteen months time for the
Competent Authority to complete proceedings, I am of the view
that in this case it will be justified to expand it to twenty four
months, since the application of the petitioner has been made WPC 5571/22
only very recently.
Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, directing the 1 st
respondent to complete proceedings in S.M.No.89/2022, after
following due procedure and after affording necessary opportunity
of being heard to the petitioner - as also any other interested
person - as expeditiously as is possible, but not later than twenty
four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this
judgment.
Though there is no specific averment regarding the
involvement of any Devaswom Board in the S.M.Proceedings, it
is made clear that if the competent Authority is to find so, then
the said entity will also be given an opportunity of being heard
while the afore directed exercise is completed.
This Writ Petition is thus disposed of.
Sd/-
RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
WPC 5571/22
APPENDIX
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED
BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21.06.2021 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF SUO MOTU REPORT IN SM NO.89/2022
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!