Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kochamma vs The New India Assurance Co.Ltd
2022 Latest Caselaw 1859 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1859 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2022

Kerala High Court
Kochamma vs The New India Assurance Co.Ltd on 18 February, 2022
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
     FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 29TH MAGHA, 1943
                          MACA NO. 390 OF 2016
   AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 983/2010 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
                          TRIBUNAL , PALAKKAD
APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:

    1     KOCHAMMA, AGED 64 YEARS
          W/O. LATE K.P. VIJAYAN, DWARAKA,
          KUNNUKADU, ELAPULLY, PALAKKAD.

    2     SUMA, AGED 40 YEARS
          W/O. SANKARA NARAYANAN, GANESHKRIPA,
          KUNNUKADU, ELAPULLY, PALAKKAD.

    3     TARA, AGED 39 YEARS
          W/O. SHAILENDRA MENON, DWARAKA, KUNNUKADU,
          ELAPULLY, PALAKKAD.

    4     V.K. SUNIL MENON
          S/O. LATE VIJAYAN, DWARAKA, KUNNUKADU,
          ELAPULLY, PALAKKAD.

          BY ADV SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN



RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

          THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.
          N.S TOWERS, NEAR STADIUM BUS STAND,
          NEAR STADIUM, PALAKKAD.

          BY ADV LAL K.JOSEPH




     THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 18.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 MACA NO. 390 OF 2016              ..2..




                       JUDGMENT

The appellants are the petitioners in O.P.

(MV)No.983/2010 on the files of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Palakkad. They have

approached this Court dissatisfied with the amount

of compensation awarded by the Tribunal. The

parties are referred to as per their status in the

claim petition.

2. According to the petitioners, on 3.10.2009,

while deceased K.P.Vijayan was travelling in a

stage carriage, he was thrown out of the rear exit

of the vehicle which was kept open and he

succumbed to the injuries sustained in the said fall.

The petitioners claimed an amount of Rs.5,00,000/-

as total compensation for the death of K.P.Vijayan

in the accident.

 MACA NO. 390 OF 2016            ..3..



       3. The 1st respondent-owner and           the 2nd

respondent-driver, of the vehicle remained ex

parte before the Tribunal. The 3rd respondent

Insurance Company admitted existence of valid

policy of insurance at the time of the accident;

however, contended that the amount claimed is

excessive and exorbitant. The Tribunal found that

the accident happened due to the negligence of

the 2nd respondent while driving the stage carriage.

The Tribunal awarded an amount of Rs.3,51,000/-

as total compensation under various heads as

follows:

 Sl.    Head under which         Amount        Amount
 No      compensation is       claimed (in   allowed (in
            claimed              Rupees)      Rupees)

1      Loss of earning         30000

2      Partial   loss     of
       earning

3      Medical expenses        100000
 MACA NO. 390 OF 2016              ..4..



4    Bystander expenses 10000

5    Damage to clothing 1000
     etc

6    Transporation               10000

7    Extra-nourishment           10000

8    Pain and suffering          30000

9    Loss of love         and 50000       25000
     affection

10   Loss of consortium          30000    100000

11   Loss of estate              10000    5000

12   Loss of dependency 400000            196000
     / economic benefits

13   Loss of amenities
     and conveniences
     of life

14   Loss  of          earning
     power

15   Funeral expenses            10000    25000

16   Disfigurement/
     deformity
 MACA NO. 390 OF 2016           ..5..



17     Any other head

       Total                  500000      351000



4. According to the petitioners, the amount

awarded by the Tribunal under various heads is

totally inadequate. It is contended by the

petitioners that the deceased was hospitalised for

51 days. Though the petitioners claimed an amount

of Rs.10,000/- towards bystander's expenses, no

amount was awarded under the said head. Since

the deceased was admitted in the hospital for 51

days, I am of the view that an amount of

Rs.10,000/- shall be awarded under the head

bystander's expenses. It is awarded.

5. No amount has been awarded under the

head transportation to hospital. An amount of

Rs.1,000/- is just and reasonable compensation MACA NO. 390 OF 2016 ..6..

under the said head. Accordingly, the same is

awarded.

6. Though an amount of Rs.1,000/- is claimed

under the head damage to clothing, no amount is

seen awarded. An amount of Rs.500/- can be

awarded under the head damage to clothing.

7. Under the head loss of dependency, an

amount of Rs.4,00,000/- has been claimed. The

Tribunal has taken the monthly income of the

deceased as Rs.3,500/-. The accident was of the

year 2009 and taking note of the decision reported

in Ramachandrappa v. Manager, Royal

Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company

Limited [2011 (13) SCC 236 : AIR 2011 SC 2951],

the notional income of the deceased has to be

taken as Rs.7,000/-. The Tribunal has rightly taken

the multiplier as '7', as the deceased was aged 64 MACA NO. 390 OF 2016 ..7..

years at the time of the accident. Therefore, the

petitioners are entitled for an amount of

Rs.3,92,000/- [7,000x12x7x2/3]. After deducting

the amount of Rs.1,96,000/- already awarded by

the Tribunal, the petitioners are entitled for an

enhanced amount of Rs.1,96,000/- under the

head loss of dependency.

In the result, the petitioners are entitled for an

enhanced amount of Rs.2,07,500/- (Rupees two

lakhs seven thousand and five hundred only)

[1,96,000+ 10,000 + 1,000 + 500]. The 3rd

respondent Insurance Company shall deposit the

said amount before the Tribunal with 9% interest

from the date of petition till realisation along with

proportionate costs within a period of two months

from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment.

While calculating interest, the petitioners will be MACA NO. 390 OF 2016 ..8..

disentitled for interest for a period of 700 days as

per order dated 18.01.2022 in C.M.Application

No.1/2016.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SB/18/02/2022

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter