Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karikunni Puthiya Purayil Hajira vs Kerala State Wakf Board
2022 Latest Caselaw 1717 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1717 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2022

Kerala High Court
Karikunni Puthiya Purayil Hajira vs Kerala State Wakf Board on 16 February, 2022
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                     PRESENT
                    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
     WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 27TH MAGHA, 1943
                            CRL.MC NO. 883 OF 2022
      C.C.778 OF 2018 PENDING BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE'S
      COURT-II, KANNUR
PETITIONER/:

               KARIKUNNI PUTHIYA PURAYIL HAJIRA
               AGED 44 YEARS
               ANCHU KANDIYIL AAYISHAS, DOOR NO. AL 251 MUHIYUDEEN
               PALLI, PARIPALANA COMMITTEE BUILDING, AYIKKARA, KANNUR.,
               PIN - 670007

               BY ADV T.P.SAJID



RESPONDENT/S:

     1         KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD
               REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, P.C. SHAMSHEER
               ALI, AGED 38 YEARS, HEAD CLERK, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KERALA
               STATE WAQF BOARD, KANNUR, PIN - 670001

     2         STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
               KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

               BY ADV SHRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ, SC, WAQF BOARD



OTHER PRESENT:

               SR.PP - SRI. HRITHWIK C.S.




     THIS      CRIMINAL   MISC.   CASE   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
16.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.883/2022                       2


                                     O R D E R

Petitioner is the accused in C.C.778 of 2018 pending before the

Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Kannur, which was taken on file

on a complaint filed by the Wakf Board represented by its Authorised

Officer, alleging offence under Section 52A of the Wakf Act.

2. Facts of the case are not disputed. Petitioner was given

possession of a shop room belonged to Muhiyudheen Mosque Paripalana

Committee of Kannur for running a juice shop; that later the Wakf Board

initiated proceedings against her for eviction and, by Annexure-A3

proceedings dated 02.02.2017, an order was passed under Section 54A of

the Wakf Act for evicting her, treating her as an encroacher. She challenged

that order before this Court which was not accepted and later the said

complaint was preferred under Section 190 of the Cr.P.C. alleging the

above stated crime. Meanwhile, the Board moved the Wakf Tribunal,

Kozhikode for getting her evicted. By Annexure-A6 order dated

22.10.2018 that O.A. was allowed and she was directed to give vacant

possession of the shop room to the Wakf Board. Pursuant to Annexure-A7

report she approached the Authorised Officer and handed over the key of

the shop room and thus on 03.05.2019 she surrendered vacant possession of

the shop room. In other words, Annexure-A6 order has become final and

she has already surrendered vacant possession of the shop room. All the

same, Annexure-A5 complaint is pending before the Judicial First Class

Magistrate's Court where offence under Section 52A of the Wakf Act is

alleged against her. Now the petitioner wants to quash the proceedings.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fair

submissions of the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent, I have

no doubt that such a proceedings cannot sustain against the petitioner.

Firstly, by virtue of Annexures-A6 and A7 proceedings the matter has

become infructuous. She has already surrendered vacant possession of the

shop room and now the Board has taken over possession of the same.

Secondly and more importantly, Section 52A of the Wakf Act had come

into force only on 01.11.2013 by an amendment. This penal provision does

not have retrospective operation. Therefore, the alleged act committed by

her prior to the amendment to the statute cannot sustain.

For these reasons, entire proceedings in CC 778 of 2018 on the file of

the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Kannur are quashed. The

Crl.M.C. is allowed and the petitioner shall stand exonerated.

Sd/-

                                                                   K.HARIPAL
                                                                      JUDGE
     okb/18.2.22                                   //True copy//        P.S. to Judge



                       APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 883/2022

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1              A TRUE COPY OF THE KOOLISHEET DATED 1/1/2000

Annexure 2              THE TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILED STATEMENT ON
                        10/1/2017 FILED BY THE PETITIONER

Annexure 3              A TRUE COPY OF THE EVICTION ORDER DATED

2/2/2017 PASSED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Annexure 4 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23/5/2017 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C). NO.

10107/2017

Annexure 5 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 23/6/2018 BEARING CMP NO. 4124/2018

Annexure 6 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22/10/2018 IN O.A. NO 96/2017 PASSED BY THE WAQF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE

Annexure 7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE HEAD CLERK OF THE WAQF BOARD AS PER REFERENCE NUMBER A3-

386CR DATED 17/6/2016 WHICH WAS RECEIVED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER RTI ACT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter