Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12464 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 2ND POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 26512 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
1 MANJU SAJEEV
W/O.SAJEEV, PARTNER, ITIHAS TOURS AND TRAVELS, CALICUT
BYEPASS ROAD, PALAKKAD - 678 001.
2 BOBY GEORGE
S/O.ABRAHAM, THEVADIYIL, PUTHUPPADY, KOZHIKODE - 686
673.
3 SUJITH K.SUDHAKARAN
S/O.SUDHAKARAN, KURIYAKKOT HOUSE, AMBAKKAD, PUZHAKKAL,
THRISSUR - 680 553.
BY ADV K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TRANSPORT
COMMISSIONERATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 039.
2 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, STATUE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
3 THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER
TRANSPORT COMMISSIONERATE, VAZHUTHACAUD,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 036.
4 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, (SECRETARY, REGIONAL
TRANSPORT AUTHORITY), KENATHUPARAMBU, KUNATHURMEDU,
PALAKKAD - 678 001.
5 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, (SECRETARY, REGIONAL
TRANSPORT AUTHORITY), GROUND FLOOR, CIVIL STATION,
ERANHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE - 673 020.
WP(C) NO. 26512 OF 2022
2
6 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, (SECRETARY, REGIONAL
TRANSPORT AUTHORITY), CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE,
THRISSUR - 68003.
7 ADDL.K.A.SEBASTIAN
SOUGHT TO BE IMPLEADED
BY ADV I.DINESH MENON
gp JUSTIN JACOB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 23.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 26512 OF 2022
3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court for quashing Ext.P5
decision of the 1st respondent regarding implementation of uniform color
scheme to all contract carriages in the State under Rule 264 of KMV
Rules which will be inforce at the time of renewal of certificate of fitness.
2. Learned Government Pleader submits that the notification
promulgated by the Government regarding the change of colour code
has already been upheld by this Court. Therefore, it cannot be deferred
by adopting a pick and choose policy.
I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and appraised
the paperbook and of the view that there is no force and merit in the
contentions for issuing directions to the respondents permitting the
petitioner to renew the permit of vehicle without adopting the uniform
colour code owing to the fact that the said notification has already been
upheld by this Court.
Writ petition with the aforementioned observation stands disposed of.
SD/-
sab AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 26512 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26512/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE
IN RESPECT OF KL-35/E 2527.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED TO KL-35/E
2527.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE 1ST
RESPONDENT DATED 9/1/2020.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT RENDERED
BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.6680 OF 2020 AND CONNECTED CASES DATED 22/9/2020.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT EXHIBITS
Exhibit R7(a) TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 6919/2021 DATED 7/07/2021.
Exhibit R7(b) TRUE COPY OF DECISION DATED 24/12/2021 BY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONRATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!