Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Divine Sebastian vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 11862 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11862 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2022

Kerala High Court
Divine Sebastian vs State Of Kerala on 21 December, 2022
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
 WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
                      BAIL APPL. NO. 8089 OF 2022
            Crime No.56/2021 of the Peravoor Excise Range,

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

            DIVINE SEBASTIAN, AGED 25 YEARS
            S/O. SEBASTIAN,KAKKAVAMATTATHIL HOUSE, VELLOONNI P.O,
            IRITTY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670703.

            BY ADV DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY


RESPONDENT/STATE:

            STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031.




OTHER PRESENT:

            PP - NIMA JACOB


     THIS   BAIL    APPLICATION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
21.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL. NO. 8089 OF 2022
                                      2


                        VIJU ABRAHAM, J

                       BA No.8089 of 2022
                               st
           Dated this the 21        day   of   December, 2022

                              O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime

No.56/2021 of the Peravoor Excise Range, alleging commission

of offence punishable under Section 55(g) of Abkari Act.

3. The prosecution case in short is that, on 03.06.2021

at 12.40 P.M the Excise party detected 150 litres of wash from

the back side of a pig farm. The pig farm was owned by one

Nimesh. It is alleged that the excise party saw the accused

while he was handling with the wash and he ran away from

the spot and thereby the accused has committed the aforesaid

offence.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

he has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid crime and

further submitted that he is residing about 17 kilometers away BAIL APPL. NO. 8089 OF 2022

from the spot where the wash was detected and the petitioner

is not the owner of the property from where the wash was

detected, but one Mr.Nimesh. The learned counsel further

submitted that the crime is registered in the year 2021 and

that the investigation have progressed considerably and his

custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of the

investigation and that the alleged contraband is also seized.

6. The learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions

submitted that the crime has been registered in the year 2021

and the petitioner may be directed to co-operate with the

investigation.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

and the nature of the allegations and taking into consideration

that the petitioner has no other criminal antecedents, I am of

the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not

be required for the purpose of the investigation and only a

limited custody be granted for the same, I am inclined to grant

anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the result, this application is allowed. Petitioner shall

surrender before the investigating officer in Crime No.56/2021 BAIL APPL. NO. 8089 OF 2022

of the Peravoor Excise Range, on 27.12.2022 at 11 am and

make himself available for interrogation. The petitioner shall

co-operate with the investigation. It is directed that in the event

of arrest of the petitioner in Crime No.56/2021 of the Peravoor

Excise Range, he shall be produced before the Jurisdictional

Court on the same day and he shall be released on bail subject

to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a

sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand

only) with two solvent sureties each for the

likesum to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional

Court,

(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the

investigating officer in Crime No.56/2021 of

the Peravoor Excise Range, on every Saturday

at 11.00 am until filing of the final report,

(iii) Petitioner shall report to the investigating

officer as and when required for the

investigation,

(iv) The petitioner shall not attempt to BAIL APPL. NO. 8089 OF 2022

influence the defacto complainant or interfere

with the investigation or to influence or

intimidate any witness in Crime No.56/2021 of

the Peravoor Excise Range,

(v) The petitioner shall not involve in any

other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the

investigating officer in Crime No.56/2021 of the Peravoor

Excise Range, may file an application before the jurisdictional

Court, for cancellation of bail.

It is made clear that it is within the power of the police

to investigate the matter and if necessary to effect recoveries

on the information if any given by the petitioner even when the

petitioner is on bail as per the judgment of the Apex Court in

Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State (NCT of Delhi) and

another (2020 (1) KHC 663).

sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM, JUDGE

R.AV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter