Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sudheer vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 11326 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11326 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2022

Kerala High Court
Sudheer vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2022
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
 FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
                      BAIL APPL. NO. 8824 OF 2022
CRIME NO.528/2022 OF VARANTHARAPPILLY POLICESTATION, THRISSUR
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3:

    1        SUDHEER,AGED 42,S/O.IBRAHIM, EDATHIL HOUSE,
             PALAPPILLY P.O., VARANDARAPPILLY VILLAGE
             CHALAKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680303
    2        MUJEEB,AGED 44,S/O.MUHAMMED, CHUNDEKKATTIL HOUSE,
             PALAPPILLY P.O., VARANDARAPPILLY VILLAGE
             CHALAKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680303
    3        ANEESH,AGED 37,S/O.MUHAMMED, CHUNDEKKATTIL HOUSE,
             PALAPPILLY P.O., VARANDARAPPILLY VILLAGE
             CHALAKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680303
             BY ADV N.L.BITTO


RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

             STATE OF KERALA
             REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
             HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM


OTHER PRESENT:

             PP - SRI.M.C.ASHI



        THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
02.12.2022,     THE    COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 BA No.8824 of 2022                            2




                               VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
               .................................................................
                              B.A. No.8824 of 2022
               .................................................................
               Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2022

                                         ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail.

2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.528 of

2022 of Varantharappilly Police Station, Thrissur registered alleging

commission of offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 506,

323, 324 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution allegation is that on 17.09.2022 at about

4.10 p.m. the petitioners requested the defacto complainant to come

out from an auto stand at Palappilly, wrongfully restrained him,

attacked him by stick and iron rod causing fracture to his hand. Thus

the accused have committed the abovesaid offences.

4. Petitioners submit that they have been falsely implicated

in the abovesaid crime. Petitioners submit that earlier a crime was

registered as Crime No.527 of 2022 by Varantharappilly Police based

on a complaint filed by the sister of accused Nos.2 and 3 against the

defacto complainant, who is her former husband. Thereafter on the

very same day the present crime has been registered against the

petitioners. Petitioners further submit that they have no other criminal

antecedents.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the

application for bail mainly contending that the defacto complainant was

attacked by the petitioners herein and he sustained serious injuries

including fracture of the hand. Learned Public Prosecutor upon

instructions submitted that the petitioners have no other criminal

antecedents.

6. It is seen that the allegations in Crime No.527 of 2022 is

that the former husband of the sister of accused Nos.2 and 3, who is

the defacto complainant in the present case has torturing her

physically and mentally and thereafter their marriage ended in divorce.

Even thereafter he has been continuously interfering with the affairs of

the sister of accused Nos.2 and 3 and harassing her and that on

17.09.2022 the defacto complainant in the present crime attacked the

petitioners herein and they sustained injuries and that they were

treated at Puthukkad Taluk Hospital and Thrissur District Hospital. To

which the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that it is only their sister

who had filed a complaint and the petitioner who claimed to have been

injured in the said incident have not preferred any complaint.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and

also taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners have no

other criminal antecedents, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to

the petitioners. In the result, the application is allowed. The petitioners

shall surrender before the Investigating Officer in Crime No.528 of

2022 of Varantharappilly Police Station, Thrissur on 10.12.2022 at

11.00 a.m. and shall make themselves available for interrogation on

that day or on any other day/days and time as directed by the

investigating officer. The petitioners shall co-operate with the

investigation. In the event of the arrest of the petitioners in Crime

No.528 of 2022 of Varantharappilly Police Station, Thrissur, they shall

be produced before the jurisdictional court on the very same day and

shall be released on bail subject to the following conditions.

(i) The petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/-

(Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each

for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional court.

(ii) They shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime

No.528 of 2022 of Varantharappilly Police Station, Thrissur as

when required.

(iii) They shall not attempt to influence the defacto complainant

or interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate

any witness in Crime No.528 of 2022 of Varantharappilly Police

Station, Thrissur.

(iv) They shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the

investigating officer in Crime No.528 of 2022 of Varantharappilly Police

Station, Thrissur may file an application before the jurisdictional Court,

for cancellation of bail.

It is made clear that it is within the power of the police to

investigate the matter and if necessary to effect recoveries on the

information if any given by any of the petitioners even when the

petitioners are on bail as per the judgment of the Apex Court in

Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another

(2020 (1) KHC 663).

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

cks

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter