Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9752 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 4TH BHADRA, 1944
BAIL APPL. NO. 5072 OF 2022
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
SAJIRAJ, AGED 47 YEARS
CHERUMANNOORTHOTTAM, KARICHIYIL, ATTINGAL P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695101
BY ADV M.S.AMAL DHARSAN
RESPONDENT/STATE:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL P.O, THIRUVANATHAPURAM,
PIN - 695101
OTHER PRESENT:
PP - SRI. M.C.ASHI
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A. No. 5072 of 2022 2
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
-------------------
B.A. No. 5072 of 2022
----------------------------------
Dated this the 26th day of August, 2022
ORDER
Application for anticipatory bail.
2. Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.692
of 2022 of Attingal Police Station,
Thiruvananthapuram District registered alleging
commission of offences punishable under Sections
341, 294(b),323 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The prosecution allegation is that, on
06/06/2022 at about 3:30pm, the accused out of
animosity towards the de-facto complainant,
wrongfully restrained the de-facto complainant who
was riding a motorcycle, uttered obscene words at
him and beat him on his back and right part of chest
resulting in fracture of the ribs, and thereby
committed the above said offences.
4. The petitioner submits that he has been
falsely implicated in the above said crime. The
defacto complainant is the husband of the
petitioner's sister and he is a habitual offender
involved in several other criminal cases. There is a
property dispute between the petitioner and the
defacto complainant. On an earlier occasion also,
the defacto complainant attempted to attack the
mother of the petitioner, thereupon, Annexures-II &
III complaints were preferred before the Attingal
Police regarding the same. Petitioner submits that
he is a member of the Armed Force. On the alleged
day the defacto complainant attempted to attack the
mother of the petitioner and a scuffle occurred and
injury if any, is sustained in connection with the
said alleged incident.
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed
the application for bail mainly contending that
serious injuries were sustained by the defacto
complainant and further that there are eye witnesses
to the alleged incident also. Learned Public
Prosecutor further submits that the petitioner has
no other criminal antecedents.
7. When the matter was came up for consideration
in the earlier occasion, this Court has passed an
order 'not to arrest the petitioner', and the said
order is still in force. Counsel for the petitioner
submits that the investigation is practically over
and custodial interrogation is not required.
8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances
of the case, and nature of the allegations, I am
inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner,
but on stringent conditions. The above bail
application is allowed with the following
directions. The petitioner shall surrender before
the investigating officer on 31.08.2022 and make
himself available for interrogation on that day or
on any other day or days as directed by the
investigating officer. In the event of arrest of the
petitioner in Crime No.692 of 2022 of Attingal
Police Station, he shall be produced before the
jurisdictional Magistrate on the same day and be
released on bail on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.692/2022 of Attingal Police Station as and when summoned to do so;
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation whenever so required;
(iv) The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence;
(v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;
(vi) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.
If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated,
the Investigating Officer in Crime No.692/2022 of
Attingal Police Station, may file an application
before the jurisdictional court for cancellation of
bail.
It is made clear that it is within the power of
the police to investigate the matter and if
necessary to effect recoveries on the information if
any given by the petitioner even when the petitioner
is on bail as per the judgment of the Apex Court in
Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State (NCT of Delhi)
and another (2020 (1) KHC 663).
sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM,JUDGE
pm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!