Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9510 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 3RD BHADRA, 1944
RSA NO. 647 OF 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE JUDGMENT DATED 12/6/2018 IN A.S
NO.54 OF 2013 OF THE PRL.SUB COURT, THALASSERY
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.3.2013 IN O.S NO.136 OF
2007 OF THE MUSIFF COURT, KUTHUPARAMBA
APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 1-5:
1 THONAKKARA GEORGE,
AGED 66 YEARS
S/O. PAILY, RESIDING AT THONAKKARA HOUSE,
ARALAM AMSOM, DESOM, PAYAM P.O,
EDOOR, THALASSERY TALUK.
2 ROBIN VATTIKKATTU,
AGED 43 YEARS
S/O. THOMAS, RESIDING AT THONAKKARA HOUSE,
ARALAM AMSOM, DESOM, PAYAM P.O,
EDOOR, THALASSERY TALUK.
3 GEORGE MAPLANTHOTTAM,
AGED 48 YEARS
MAPLANTHOTTAM HOUSE, ARALAM AMSOM, DESOM,
PAYAM P.O, EDOOR, THALASSERY TALUK.
4 MATHACHAN @ VATTAMATTAM MATHEW.
AGED 56 YEARS
S/O. JOSEPH, ARALAM AMSOM, DESOM, PAYAM P.O,
EDOOR, THALASSERY TALUK.
5 MATHACHAN @ MATHEW KUTILIL,
AGED 68 YEARS
S/O. SCARIA, KUTILIL HOUSE, ARALAM AMSOM, DESOM, PAYAM
P.O, EDOOR , THALASSERY TALUK.
BY ADVS.
MANU.M.THOMAS
SRI.P.C.ANIL KUMAR
SMT.P.SREESHA
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS 6 TO 9:
1 MICHAEL ANTONY,
AGED 50 YEARS
S/O. ANTONY, WORKING IN KUWAIT,
RESIDING AT PALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE,
ARALAM AMSOM, DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK,
KANNUR DISTRICT, REP. BY P.A. HOLDER P.M. JOSEPH, S/O.
MATHEW, AGED 70 YEARS, PALLITHADATHIL HOUSE, PAYAM
AMSAM DESOM, KANNUR
RSA No.647 of 2019
2
2 SECRETARY,
IRITTY BLCOK PANCHAYATH, IRITTY KANNUR-670 703
3 PRESIDENT,
IRITTY BLOCK PANCHAYATH, IRITTY , KANNUR-670 703
4 ARALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O. PAYAM, KANNUR 670 704.
5 STATE OF KERALA,
REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR-670 001
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN - R1 BY POA
SRI.JAYANANDAN MADAYI PUTHIYAVEETTIL -R1 BY POA
SRI.JITHIN S SUNDARAN -R1 BY POA
SRI.CIBI THOMAS - R4
GOVERNMENT PLEADER -R5
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA No.647 of 2019
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25th day of August, 2022
This appeal has been filed against the judgment and
decree in A.S. No.54/2013 on the file of Principal Sub Court,
Thalassery, which arise out of the judgment and decree in O.S.
No.136/2007 on the file of Munsiff Court, Kuthuparamba.
2. When the case came up for hearing, it is submitted
by the learned counsel for both parties that the matter has
been settled out of court. I.A. No.1/2022 compromise petition
has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 stipulating the various
terms of compromise.
3. On going through the terms of compromise, I am
satisfied that all the issues between the parties have been
amicably settled out of court. Accordingly, the compromise is
recorded. In the light of the same judgment and decree passed
by the Munsiff Court, Kuthuparamba in O.S. No.136/2007 and
the judgment and decree passed by the Principal Sub Court,
Thalassery in A.S. No.54/2013 is hereby set aside.
RSA is disposed of in terms with the compromise petition. RSA No.647 of 2019
Defendants 6 to 9 being formal parties have not signed the
compromise petition. I.A. No.1/2022 will form part of the
decree.
All pending I.As. are closed.
Sd/-
M.R.ANITHA JUDGE
SMF
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!