Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9252 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2022
W.P(C) .578/2020 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 19TH SRAVANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 578 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:
1 ARUN SINGH
AGED 35 YEARS
ONAMPOZHIL HOUSE, PANANGAD, ERNAKULAM, KERALA, PIN-682
506.
2 THANKAPPAN O.C.
AGED 74 YEARS
ONAMPOZHIL HOUSE, PANANGAD, ERNAKULAM, KERALA, PIN-682
506.
3 USHA O.T.
AGED 57 YEARS
ONAMPOZHIL HOUSE, PANANGAD, ERNAKULAM, KERALA, PIN-682
506.
BY ADVS.
NAVANEETH.N.NATH
SRI.K.S.STEJO
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE PEOPLES URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO.51
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, HEAD OFFICE,
THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM, KERALA-682 031.
2 THE PEOPLES URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.51
REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, VYTTILA BRANCH,
ERNAKULAM, KERALA-682 019.
3 P.A.XAVIER
POOPPANA HOUSE, PALLURUTHY, ERNAKULAM, KERALA, PIN-682
006.
BY ADVS.
SRI.DEVAPRASANTH.P.J.
SRI.N.C.JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P(C) .578/2020 2
JUDGMENT
Petitioners have approached this Court being aggrieved by proceedings
initiated against the petitioners under the provisions of the Securitisation and
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
(hereinafter referred to as the SARFAESI Act) for recovery of amounts due
from them. The property of the petitioners was brought to sale and it was
purchased in public auction by the 3rd respondent. Despite the above, this
Court, through order dated 14.2.2020, permitted the parties to resort to
mediation for settlement of disputes. Though the mediation did not succeed in
the first round, this Court on 04.01.2022 again referred the parties to attempt
mediation.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, it is the
submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter could not
be settled through mediation.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submitted
that the property of the petitioners was sold on 20.3.2019 and the entire
amount of Rs.23,01,000/- was paid by the auction purchaser immediately after
the date of the auction. It is submitted that despite the above, the bank has not
been able to put the auction purchaser in possession and the petitioners are
continuing occupation of the property. It is submitted that proceedings have
been initiated against the petitioners under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act
and at that stage the petitioners approached this Court by filing the above writ
petition.
Having regard to the aforesaid facts and taking into consideration the
fact that mediation is failed and the petitioners have no concrete proposal to
settle the liabilities, this writ petition is dismissed permitting the continuance
of proceedings under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act against the petitioners.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE okb/ //True copy// P.S. to Judge
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 578/2020
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 4.2.2019 IN WPC NO.1538/2019.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.3.2019 IN WPC NO.9464/2019.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE M.C.580/2019 DATED 7.9.2019 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK BEFORE THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, ERNAKULAM.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 3.12.2019 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONERS BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, ERNAKULAM IN M.C.580/19.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!