Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4848 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 9TH VAISAKHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 30121 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
ANIL BABU P
AGED 45 YEARS
S/O.APPU,
PALLIKKARA KOZHAKKOTTUR,
AREEKODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
PIN-673639.
BY ADV K.RAKESH
RESPONDENT:
ICICI BANK
PEEKEYS ARCADE,
NEAR BUS STAND, DOWN HILL, MALAPPURAM,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676519,
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 29.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.30121/2021
2
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
.......................................
W.P.(C) No.30121 of 2021
................................................
Dated this the 29th day of April, 2022
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has availed a credit facility to the tune of
Rs.4,76,000/- from the respondent bank and due to the
difficulties caused by the pandemic, repayments were not
made in time and the same led to proceedings for recovery
against the petitioner.
2. The limited prayer of the petitioner in this writ petition is
to grant instalment facility to pay the overdue amounts in
instalments and to regularise the loan account.
3. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Bank, on
instructions, submits that the overdue amount is
Rs.1,40,402/-.
4. Taking into account the averments in the writ petition and
after hearing the learned counsel on either side, I deem it
appropriate to grant '5' equal monthly instalments to the
petitioner to wipe off the overdue amounts due to the
respondent bank.
WP(C) NO.30121/2021
5. In the said circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of,
permitting the petitioner to clear off the overdue amount of
Rs.1,40,402/- along with bank charges in '5' equal monthly
instalments, commencing from 01.06.2022 and the
remaining instalments shall be paid on or before the 1 st
day of every succeeding month. The petitioner will also be
liable to pay the applicable EMI with the accrued interest,
if any, continuously over and above the instalments to pay
off the overdue amounts.
6. It is made clear that, if there are two consecutive defaults,
the petitioner will lose the benefit of this judgment and the
respondent bank will be at liberty to proceed against the
petitioner on the basis of the recovery proceedings already
initiated.
7. In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire
amounts, all coercive proceedings initiated against the
petitioner shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JUDGE
AMV/30/04/2022 WP(C) NO.30121/2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 30121/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 13(2) SARFAESI ACT DATED 30.11.2021.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LOAN ACCOUNT STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER IN THE RESPONDENT BANK.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL
TRUE COPY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!