Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vimalkumar M.P vs District Collector
2022 Latest Caselaw 4454 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4454 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2022

Kerala High Court
Vimalkumar M.P vs District Collector on 12 April, 2022
WP(C) No.13913/2022                      1/5




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                      PRESENT
                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
             Tuesday, the 12th day of April 2022 / 22nd Chaithra, 1944
                            WP(C) NO. 13913 OF 2022(L)
   PETITIONER:

          VIMALKUMAR M.P,AGED 64 YEARS S/O.ACHUTHAN NAIR, MANGATILIYIL
          ,POONATH MAYANNUR, THRISSUR-679 105, SECRETARY, MAYANNUR THALAPPOLI
          MAHOLSAVA COMMITTEE, MAYANNUR DESOM, MAYANNUR , THRISSUR-679 105

   RESPONDENTS:

      1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR FIRST FLOOR , CIVIL STATION, CIVIL LINES RD,
         KALYAN NAGAR, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680 003
      2. DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, THRISSUR-680 003
      3. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION,
         THRISSUR-680 003
      4. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION MINISTRY OF
         COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, UDYOG BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 011
      5. DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES
         SAFETY ORGANISATION (PESO), KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM-682
         037

        Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
   stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
   pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to issue license in Form LE-6 so as
   to enable the petitioner to conduct public display of fireworks to be
   conducted on 17-4-2022 at 7.30 PM using 1.50000 Nos. olapadakkam, 2. 500
   Nos. Mazhathoranam, 3. 500 Nos. Mathappu, 4. 500 Nos. Chinese crackers, 5.
   500 Nos. Poothiri and subject to any conditions to be prescribed for the
   same, pending consideration of the writ petition, in the interest of
   justice.
        This petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and
   the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
   SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN, Advocate for the petitioner, GOVERNMENT PLEADER for
   respondents 1 to 3 and of ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA for
   respondents 4 & 5, the court passed the following:-




        P.T.O.
 WP(C) No.13913/2022                            2/5




                                       VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
                              -------------------------------------------
                                  W.P.(C) No.13913 of 2022
                            -----------------------------------------------
                             Dated this the 12th day of April, 2022

                                            ORDER

Admit.

2. The learned Government Pleader takes

notice for respondents 1 to 3. The learned ASGI

takes notice for respondents 4 and 5.

3. The petitioner challenges Ext.P6 order

passed by the 3rd respondent, whereby the

permission for conducting fireworks on 17.04.2022

in connection with the festival at Sree Kurumba

Bhagavathy Temple was declined. As per the

averment in the writ petition, the petitioner has now

decided to scale down the use of the fireworks as is

seen from the averment in paragraph No.6 of the WP(C) No.13913/2022 3/5

W.P.(C) No.13913 of 2022

writ petition and that the petitioner is ready and

willing to produce portable magazine/magazines to

the satisfaction of the Authorities and produce the

risk assessment plan and undertake to satisfy all

the other requisite conditions for firework display

under LE-6 licence to the satisfaction of the

Authorities. On the basis of the same, the

petitioner would submit that in similar cases, orders

have been issued, as is evident from Ext.P7

judgment which was followed in Ext.P8 interim

order passed in W.P.(C) No.6673 of 2022 and

therefore, on the basis of the same, the petitioner

seeks for a reconsideration of Ext.P6 by the 3 rd

respondent.

4. I have heard the learned Government

Pleader.

In view of the contention now taken in the writ WP(C) No.13913/2022 4/5

W.P.(C) No.13913 of 2022

petition that they have scaled down the quantity of

fire works that is to be used, I feel it appropriate

that the 3rd respondent re-consider the claim of the

petitioner for permission to conduct fireworks during

the festival scheduled to be conducted on

17.04.2022. If the petitioner approaches the 3 rd

respondent along with the said proposal, the same

shall be duly considered in the light of Exts.P7 to P9

orders passed by this Court. A decision in this

regard shall be taken on or before 14.04.2022.

H/o

Sd/-

                                                            VIJU ABRAHAM
                                                                 JUDGE

             SPR




12-04-2022                         /True Copy/                              Assistant Registrar
 WP(C) No.13913/2022                 5/5

                       APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13913/2022
Exhibit P6            TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 8.4.2022

NO.DCTSR/3820/2022/C6 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.2.2020 IN WPC NO.5261/2020 Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28.2.2022 IN WPC NO.6673/2022 Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 8.4.2022 IN WPC NO.13313/2022

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter