Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karunataka Yogam vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 4132 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4132 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2022

Kerala High Court
Karunataka Yogam vs State Of Kerala on 7 April, 2022
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
                                  &
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
   THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1944
                       WP(C) NO.12596 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

          KARUNATAKA YOGAM
          REGISTERED NO: P-77/2004, PERINGOL, THIRUVALLA,
          KAVUMBHAGAM.P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 689102
          BY ADV T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI


RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATE OF KERALA, REVENUE( DEVASWOM) DEPARTMENT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, SECRETARIAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS
          SECRETARY, PIN - 695001
    2     COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
          NANTHANCODE, KAWDIAR POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ,
          PIN - 695003
    3     SPECIAL THAHSILDAR, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,
          NANTHANCODE, KAWDIAR POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ,
          PIN - 695003


          SRI.G.BIJU-SC

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 07.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                   2

W.P.(C) No.12596 of 2022

                           JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J

The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to quash

Ext.P3 notice dated 04.02.2022, which is pasted on the building,

which is the subject matter of this writ petition, which is situated

in Survey No.24/1(Old No.433/5C) of Thiruvalla Village. The reliefs

sought for in this writ petition are writ of certiorari to quash

Ext.P3, if it relates to the petitioner's property in Survey No.24/1

(Old Sy.No.433/5C) of Thiruvalla Village; and a writ of mandamus

commanding the 3rd respondent to abstain from proceeding

against the property of the petitioner in Survey No.24/1 (Old

Sy.No.433/5C) of Thiruvalla Village; The document marked as

Exts.P4 is the objection stated to have been filed by the petitioner

on 20.02.2022 before the 3rd respondent, on Ext.P3 notice. The

petitioner would submit that the said objection is now pending

consideration before the 3rd respondent.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the

learned Senior Government Pleader for the 1st respondent and also

the learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3.

W.P.(C) No.12596 of 2022

3. The learned Standing Counsel for Travancore

Devaswom Board would submit that, in case Ext.P4 objection is

already received by the 3rd respondent, the said respondent shall

consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a

period of two weeks.

4. In State of U.P. v. Harish Chandra [(1996) 9 SCC

309] the Apex Court held that no mandamus can be issued to

direct the Government to refrain from enforcing the provisions of

law or to do something which is contrary to law. In Bhaskara Rao

A.B. v. CBI [(2011) 10 SCC 259] the Apex Court reiterated

that, generally, no Court has competence to issue a direction

contrary to law nor can the Court direct an authority to act in

contravention of the statutory provisions. The courts are meant to

enforce the rule of law and not to pass the orders or directions

which are contrary to what has been injected by law.

5. Having considered the submissions made by the learned

counsel on both sides, this writ petition is disposed of by directing

the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P4 objections, by conducting a

personal hearing on 11th April 2022, and take an appropriate

decision strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as

W.P.(C) No.12596 of 2022

possible, at any rate, on or before 19th April 2022.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not interfered with in any

manner on Ext.P3 notice or expressed anything on the merits of

the objections raised by the petitioner in Ext.P4.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

ANIL K.NARENDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

P.G. AJITHKUMAR JUDGE PV

W.P.(C) No.12596 of 2022

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12596/2022

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit-P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER DATED 25.02.2004 ISSUED FROM DISTRICT REGISTRAR,PATHANAMTHITTA Exhibit-P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT FOR THE YEAR 2021-22 ISSUED FROM VILLAGE OFFICE, THIRUVALLA DATED 17.02.2022 Exhibit-P-3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE FOUND ATTACHED IN THE BUILDING DATED 04.02.2022 I Exhibit-P-4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 20.02.2022 THROUGH E MAIL BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter