Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Beena Jerry vs S.Manoj
2021 Latest Caselaw 20065 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20065 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2021

Kerala High Court
Beena Jerry vs S.Manoj on 24 September, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
                              &
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
 FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 2ND ASWINA, 1943
                     RFA NO. 262 OF 2020
    AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.07.2019 IN
    O.S.NO.17/2018 OF THE SUB COURT, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI
APPELLANTS:

    1    BEENA JERRY,
         AGED 55 YEARS,
         W/O. LATE JERRY SEBASTIAN,   CHERIYAKADAVIL HOUSE,
         CHENNOOR DESAM, KADAMAKUDI   VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR
         TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
    2    STAWIN JERRY,
         AGED 28 YEARS,
         S/O. LATE JERRY SEBASTIAN,   CHERIYAKADAVIL HOUSE,
         CHENNOOR DESAM, KADAMAKUDI   VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR
         TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
    3    SWAN JERRY,
         AGED 25 YEARS,
         D/O. LATE JERRY SEBASTIAN,   CHERIYAKADAVIL HOUSE,
         CHENNOOR DESAM, KADAMAKUDI   VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR
         TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
    4    SONA JERRY,
         AGED 22 YEARS
         D/O. LATE JERRY SEBASTIAN,   CHERIYAKADAVIL HOUSE,
         CHENNOOR DESAM, KADAMAKUDI   VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR
         TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
         BY ADVS.
         S.SREEKUMAR (SR.)
         SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE
         SMT.A.A.SHIBI
         SRI.P.PRIJITH
         SRI.THOMAS P.KURUVILLA
         SRI.P.V.VIJU
         SRI.AJAY BEN JOSE
         SHRI.HARIKRISHNAN S.
 R.F.A.No.262 OF 2020             2

RESPONDENT:

         S.MANOJ,
         AGED 44 YEARS
         S/O. LATE SANKAYA, RESIDING AT SUBRAMANIAN
         COLONY, HOUSE NO. 42, SURYANELLI KARA,
         CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK.
         BY ADVS.
         SRI.S.NIDHEESH
         SRI.JOSEPH KURIAN VALLAMATTAM
         SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA


THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
24.09.2021,   THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 R.F.A.No.262 OF 2020              3

                            JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The appellants have filed this appeal under Section 96 read

with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,

challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.07.2019 of the

Sub Court, Devikulam, in O.S.No.17 of 2018.

2. This appeal was filed with a delay of 359 days, which

is condoned today, by a separate order in C.M.Appl.No.1 of 2020.

3. By the order dated 28.08.2021, both parties were

directed to appear before the Nodal Officer, Ernakulam Mediation

Centre, in the premises of this Court, on 27.08.2021.

4. Today, when the case is taken up for consideration,

the report of the Mediator is placed on record, enclosing

therewith a copy of the memorandum of agreement dated

27.08.2021 executed under Section 89 of the Code of Civil

Procedure, 1908, read with Rules 24 and 25 of the Kerala Civil

Procedure (Mediation), Rules, 2008. The terms and conditions in

that agreement read thus;

"1. The appellants agree to repay a sum of Rs.60,00,000/- (Rupees Sixty Lakhs only) to the respondent/plaintiff with 6% interest from the date of judgment in R.F.A.No.262 of 2020 till 15 months, or till if the amounts are paid before

the said period.

2. The above said amount shall be paid within 15 months from today. In case of default, the plaintiff will be entitled to recover interest from the date of filing of the suit namely from 16.07.2018 on the sum of Rs.58,00,000/- (rupees Fifty Eight Lakhs only).

3. The attachment in the property is agreed to be made absolute till the above said amount is paid.

4. In case if the defendants/appellants choose to sell the attached property, she may proceed with the sale, on condition that the advance amount shall be utilised for clearing the amounts as per the settlement.

5. The court fee paid by the appellants may be refunded to the appellants."

4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and also

the learned counsel for the respondent.

Since the matter has already been settled between the

parties in terms of the agreement of the Mediator dated

27.08.2021, this appeal is disposed of in terms of that mediation

settlement agreement, which will form part of this judgment.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

K. BABU JUDGE yd

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter