Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19657 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 26TH BHADRA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 29381 OF 2008
PETITIONERS:
1 MANIMON AND OTHERS
HOUSE NO. 75 A/XIII, VELLANATHURUTHU,, ALAPPAD.
2 THANKACHI KUNNUMPURATH HOUSE
NO. 318/XIII, ALAPPAD.
3 HARILAL EDAYILA VEEDU
HOUSE NO. 88 A/XIII, VELLANATHURUTHU, ALAPPAD.
4 VIJAYADHARAN PULIMOOTTIL
H. NO. 99/XIII, VELLANA THURUTHU, CHERIYAZHICKAL, ALAPPAD.
5 PRABHA KOCHU VEETTIL
HOUSE NO. 116/XIII, VELLANATHURUTHU.
6 SASIMATHI WO. SASI
CHALLIYIL HOUSE NO. 254/XII,, VELLANATHURUTHU, CHERIYAZHICKAL,
ALAPPAD.
7 RENKAN KUNNUMPURATHU
HOUSE NO. 57/XII,, VALLANATHURUTHU, CHERIYAZHICKAL, ALAPPAD.
8 RAAHULAN ARAYASSERIL
HOUSE NO. 403 B/V, SRAYIKKAD, ALAPPAD.
9 SUMA THEKKE THUPPASSERIL
HOUSE NO. 401 C/XII, VELLANATHURUTHU,, ALAPPAD.
10 BOSE HOUSE NO. 401 AXII
THEKKE THUPPASSERIL,, VELLANATHURUTHU, ALAPPAD.
11 RAJESH KALUPURAYIL
HOUSE NO. 314/XII,, PANDARATHURUTHU, ALAPPAD.
12 SADHU SHEELANA HOUSE NO. 125 BXII
PANDARATHURUTHU, ALAPPAD.
13 SWAMYNATHAN SADHU PURUTHU
WP(C) NO. 29381 OF 2008
2
HOUSE NO. 262/XII, PANDARATHURUTHU,, CHERIYAZHICKAL,
ALAPPAD.
14 SURESH PUTHUMANGALATH
HOUSE NO. 259/XII,, PANDARATHURUTHU,
CHERIYAZHICKAL.P.O,, ALAPPAD.
15 JOYI THEKKE THUPPASSERIL HOUSE
HOUSE NO. 401 B/XII, VELLANATHURUTHU, ALAPPAD.
BY ADV SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS
CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REP. BY ITS
SECRETARY (CUSTODIAN OF RELIEF FUND),
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3 DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLLAM.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
ALAPPAD VILLAGE, ALAPPAD, KARUNAGAPPALLY.
BY ADV GOVERNMENT PLEADER
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT. RASHMI.K.M, SR.GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 29381 OF 2008
3
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
===================
WP(C) No. 29381 OF 2008
===================
Dated this the 17th day of September 2021
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following
prayers;
" i) To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to provide new houses to the petitioners under the Tsunami Rehabilitation Programme;
ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to conduct an Independent Enquiry into the allegations of the petitioners by appointing an appropriate team for enquiring into the facts that whether the present allotment 4544 houses, especially 537 new houses in Alappad Village alone are in favour of Genuine victims and to find out why the petitioners excluded from the list of Allotment of new Houses;
iii. To issue such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court shall deem just and proper in the circumstances of the case."
WP(C) NO. 29381 OF 2008
2. This writ petition is pending before this Court from
2008 onwards. The learned counsel for the petitioners
submitted that, the petitioners will file a fresh representation
narrating their grievance and the same may be directed to
considered by the 1st respondent.
3. The learned Government Pleader submitted that
the benefits that can be given to the petitioners were already
given. It is also submitted that, even after filing the writ
petition the benefits were given to some of the petitioners.
Submission of the learned Government Pleader is that
probably the prayers in the writ petition are infructuous.
4. I don't want to make any observations about the
merit of the case. If the petitioners are still aggrieved and
they have any surviving grievance, they can file a
representation before the 1st respondent and the same can
be directed to be considered by the 1st respondent. WP(C) NO. 29381 OF 2008
Therefore this writ petition is disposed in the following
manner.
1. The petitioners are free to file a representation
before the 1st respondent, within three weeks from the date
of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if they have any
surviving grievance.
2. If such a representation is received, the 1 st
respondent will consider the same and pass appropriate
orders, in accordance to law, within four months from the
date of receipt of such representation.
(Sd/-)
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE LU WP(C) NO. 29381 OF 2008
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29381/2008
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 05.09.2008 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER IN FAVOUR OF THE 1ST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 05.09.2008 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ALAPPAD VILLAGE TO 9TH PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P1(B) TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 05.09.2008 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ALAPPAD VILLAGE TO THE 10TH PETITIONER
EXHIBIT P1(C) TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 05.09.2008 ISSUED TO THE 12TH PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT FILED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA IN W.P.C. NO. 16881/2005
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE ALLOTTMENT LIST PUBLISHED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
// True Copy // PA to Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!