Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19558 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 26TH BHADRA, 1943
OP (CAT) NO. 47 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA 262/2020 OF CENTRAL
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/S:
1 SMT.,DEEPA RAJ
AGED 38 YEARS
AGED 38 YEARS,W/O.SAIJU D.,SENIOR STATISTICAL
OFFICER,NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY ORGANIZATION,(FIELD
OPRATION DIVISION),
SUB REGIONAL OFFICE,GOVT.OF INDIA,CGO COMPLEX,3RD
FLOOR,KENDRIYA BHAVAN,KAKKANAD,COCHIN-682037. MOB:94965
34086.
2 SMT.MANEESH B.,
AGED 36 YEARS,W/O.SREEKANTH,
SENIOR STATISTICAL OFFICER,NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY
ORGANIZATION,(FIELD OPRATION DIVISION), SUB REGIONAL
OFFICE,GOVT.OF INDIA,CGO COMPLEX,3RD FLOOR,KENDRIYA
BHAVAN,KAKKANAD,COCHIN-682037. MOB:79072 23862.
BY ADVS.
T.C.GOVINDASWAMY
SRI.N.UNNIIKRISHNAN
KALA T.GOPI
B.NAMADEVA PRABHU
T.N.SREEKALA
RESPONDENT/S:
1 K.R. KRISHNAKUMAR
(EMPLOYEE CODE NO.4142,)AGED 50 YEARS,ASSISTANT
DIRECTOR GRADE-II,M.S.M.E.DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE,
KANJANI ROAD,THRISSUR-680 003,
RESIDING AT KALLINGAL HOUSE,VAKKAT ROAD,VENNALA,COCHIN-
682 028.
MOBILE NO.94463 43116.
2 THE UNION OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA,MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL AND PUBLIC
GRIEVANCES,DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING,NORTH
BLOCK,NEW DELHI-110 001.
OP(CAT)No.47/2021
2
3 THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
MINISYTRY OF STATISTICS AND PRGRAMME
IMPLEMENTATION,SUBORDINATE STATISTICAL SERVICE,ROOM
NO.528,SARDAR PATEL BHAVAN,SANSAD MARG,NEW DELHI-110
001.
4 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL,
SUBORDINATE STATISTICAL SERVICE(SSS),NATIONAL SAMPLE
SURVEY ORGANIZATION,
UNION OF INDIA,NEW DELHI-110 001.
5 THE CHAIRMAN,
SCREENING COMMITTEE,CENTRAL SERVICE BOARD,MINISTRY OF
STATISTICS AND PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION,SARDAR PATEL
BHAVAN,SANSAD MARG,NEW DELHI-110 001.
6 THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER,
MICRO,SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES, A-WING,7TH
FLOOR,NIRMAN BHAVAN,
NEW DELHI-110 001.
7 THE DIRECTOR,
MICRO,SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES,DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTE,,KANJANI ROAD,
AYYANTHOLE,THRISSUR-680 003.
BY ADVS.
N.UNNIKRISHNAN
SRI.K.R.RAJKUMAR,CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL(B/O)
THIS OP (CAT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
OP(CAT)No.47/2021
3
ALEXANDER THOMAS & A. BADHARUDEEN, JJ.
===============================================
OP(CAT)No.47/2021
[Arising out of the Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench in
O.A.No.180/00262/2020]
===============================================
Dated this the 17th day of September, 2021
JUDGMENT
Alexander Thomas, J.
The matter arises out of the non-consideration of the request of
the original applicant/R1 in the OP in regard to his request for the
transfer from his present station to Ernakulam on account of medical
compassionate grounds. The main plea of the original applicant was to
the effect that he is suffering from serious heart ailments and that his
wife, who is based in Ernakulam is also suffering from serious kidney
ailments. Whereas, contesting respondents 7 and 8 in the
OA/petitioners in the OP, are far juniors to the original applicant and
that they have been accommodated in Ernakulam/Kochi without
considering the claims of the original applicant. Further that R7 in the
OA/1st petitioner in the OP, has not clearly disclosed in her application
for transfer that her spouse was in fact working in Palakkad Division of
the Railways (Meenakshipuram), etc. Further that it appears that both
R7 and R8 in the OA had not really desired for transfer to Ernakulam
and they would have been satisfied, if they have been transferred to
stations of their choice other than Ernakulam, even though they had OP(CAT)No.47/2021
formally submitted their transfer applications seeking to transfer to
Kochi/Ernakulam.
2. The Tribunal after hearing both sides, appears to have taken
the view that it is indisputable that the original applicant is suffering
from serious heart ailment and that and his wife is also suffering from
grave kidney diseases and that the non-consideration of his request for
transfer to Ernakulam on compassionate medical grounds may not be
right and proper. The Tribunal has also noted that R7 in the OA/1 st
petitioner in the OP has not stated that her spouse was in fact based in
Palakkad in connection with his work for Southern Railway and that if
that fact had been made known to the transferring authority probably
they would not have issued an order transferring her to
Ernakulam/Cochin.
3. Taking note of the various aspects in the matter, the
Tribunal has taken the considered view that in view of the non-
consideration of the request of the original applicant for compassionate
transfer, the matter would require a remit and serious reconsideration.
It is in that view that the Tribunal had quashed the impugned transfer
orders issued in favour of R7 and R8 in the OA and has directed that the
transfer applications of all the three parties be considered afresh.
4. The transfer requests of the original applicant in the OA and
R7 and R8 in the OA, has been ordered to be placed by the competent
authority among the respondents before the competent body OP(CAT)No.47/2021
concerned, viz. CSB, (which we were told is the Civil Service Board) for
consideration of their requests for transfer and that all the claims of the
three incumbents may be reconsidered, so that the claims of the original
applicant for medical and compassionate ground for transfer should
also be seriously reconsidered by the competent CSB, etc. It is this
verdict of the Tribunal at Ext.P1, that is under challenge in this OP. In
view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, we are not inclined
to disturb the well-considered verdict of the Tribunal at Ext.P1. This is
for simple reason that the appreciation made by the Tribunal is mainly
based on factual aspects and the same cannot said to be perverse or
manifestly and unreasonable. May be another reasonable view was
plausible in the facts and circumstances of the case. Merely because
another reasonable view is plausible in the facts and circumstances of
the case, is no ground in judicial review and judicial superintendence
for this Court to set aside and quash the considered verdict of Tribunal
at Ext.P1.
5. We are told by Sri.T.C.Govindaswamy, learned Counsel
appearing for the petitioners in the OP/R7 & R8 in the OA, that his
parties (R7 and R8 in the OA) will be satisfied, if they are transferred
either to Kollam or to Thiruvananthapuram. That being so, it is for
them to file written submissions in the matter, which shall be addressed
to the competent authority concerned along with a copy of this
judgment which, the competent authority will ensure that the same is OP(CAT)No.47/2021
placed before the competent authorized body concerned viz. CSB, for
effective consideration. All the three parties will ensure that their
additional written submissions in the matter, if any, shall be sent by
registered speed post with acknowledgment due with a copy of this
judgment, to the competent officer among the respondents, who in turn
will ensure that the same is immediately placed before the CSB for
effective consideration. This process of filing of additional written
submissions may be duly completed by the original applicant and R7 &
R8 in the OA within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment. The competent body concerned, CSB, will ensure that a
considered and proper decision is taken on the various requests of the
three parties concerned, namely the original applicant/R7 and R8 in the
OA, without much delay, preferably within a period of six weeks from
the date of filing of such written submission along with a copy of this
judgment or at any rate, within a outer limit of 8 weeks therefrom.No
further orders and directions are called for in the OP. Accordingly, the
above OP will stand finally disposed of.
6. Needless to say, the interim arrangement ordered by the
Tribunal at Para. 22 of Ext.P1 final order to the extent that R7 and R8 in
the OA will be permitted to continue in the present station temporarily
until orders are passed by the competent authority as afore-stated on
the request of the three incumbents for transfer, will in force. No
further orders are called for in the original petition. Sri.K.R.Rajkumar, OP(CAT)No.47/2021
learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the official
respondents will ensure that copies of this judgment are forwarded to
the competent respondent- officers concerned, including the CSB for
necessary information and further immediate action.
With the above observations and directions, this original petition
will stand disposed of.
sd/ ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE
sd/ A. BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE
jm/ OP(CAT)No.47/2021
APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 47/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN OA NO.180/00262/2020 DATED 01/06/2021.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF OA NO.180/00262/2020 DATED 16/06/2020, ALONG WITH ITS ANNEXURES FILED BEFORE THE HON'BLE TRIBUNAL.
Annexure A1 A TRUE COPY OF DISCHARGE SUMMARY DATED 05/10/2016 ISSUED FROM RENAI MEDICITY MULTI SPECIALITY HOSPITAL, KOCHI - 25.
Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF LATEST CERTIFICATE DATED 02/06/2020 ISSUED BY DR.JAY B.PATTAM, CONSULTANT INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLIGIST, RENAI MEDICITY MULTI SPECIALTY HOSPITAL, KOCHI -
Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 07/12/2019 ISSUED BY DR.MAMMEN, CONSULTANT NEPHROLOGIST, REG.NO.20136, MEDICAL TRUST HOSPITAL, DEPARTGMENT OF NEPHTROLOGY, PALLIMUKH, ERNAKULAM IN RESPECT OF WIFE OF THE APPLICANT.
Annexure A4 A TRUE COPY OF LATEST CERTIFICATE DATED 01/06/2020 ISSUED BY DR.MAMMEN, CONSULTANT NEPHROLOGIST, REG.NO.20136, MEDICAL TRUST HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF NEPHROLOGY, PALLIMUKH, ERNAKULAM IN RESPECT OF WIFE OF THE APPLICANT.
Annexure A5 A TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 29/04/2019.
Annexure A6 A TRUE COPY OF COMMON TRANSFER ORDER NO.11015/1/2018-SSS DATED 04/12/2019. Annexure A7 A TRUE COPY OF E-MAIL DATED 03/12/2019 (4.43 PM) SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Annexure A8 A TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 10/12/2019 INOA NO.180/00877/2019.
Annexure A9 A TRUE COPY OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 16/12/2019 IN OA NO.180/00898/2019.
Annexure A10 A COPY OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 26/12/2019 IN OA 180/928/2019 FILED BY ALBY ANNIE GEORGE (EMPLOYEE CODE NO.5476).
Annexure A11 NIL Annexure A12 A TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED
14/02/2019 SUBMITTED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT. Annexure A13 A TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 24/06/2019 OF THE 7TH RESPONDENT.
Annexure A14 A TRUE COPY OFFICE MEMORANDUM NO.11015/1/2018-SSS DATED 14/03/2019. OP(CAT)No.47/2021
Annexure A15 A TRUE COPY OF TRANSFER APPLICATION 22/11/2019 OF 7TH RESPONDENT.
Annexure A16 A TRUE COPY OF EMEPLOYMENT CERTIFICATE NO.J/P 535/VIII/SMS DATED 10/10/2019 ISSUED BY THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, PERSONNEL BRANCH, PALGHAT TO THE HUSBAND OF RESPONDENT NO.7 SHRI.SANJU, STATION MASTER, MEENAKSHIPURAM.
Annexure A17 A TRUE COPY OF OFFICE MEMORANDUM NO.A-
32016/7/2014 E.II DATED 03/03/2015.
Annexure A18 A TRUE COPY OF MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD (CSB) FOR SUBORDINATE STATISTICAL SERVICE (SSS) HELD ON 05/07/2019 AT 10.00 HOURS AT S.P.BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. Annexure A19 A TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT OF OWN COST TRANSFER/CANCELLATION REQUESTS RECEIVED FROM SENIOR STATISTICAL OFFICERS RECEIVED ALONG WITH ANNEXURE - 18.
Annexure A20 A TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.11011/01(04)/2019-
SSS DATED 20/01/2020. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD (CSB) FORM SUBORDINATE STATISTICAL SERVICE (SSS) HELD ON 28TH NOVEMBER, 2019 AT 10.30 HRS AT SANKIYAKI BHAVAN, DELHI AND STATEMENT OF OWN COST TRANSFER/CANCELLATION REQUESTS RECEIVED FROM SENIOR STATISTICAL OFFICERS.
Annexure A21 A TRUE COPY OF OFFICE MEMORANDUM NO.28034/9/2009-ESTT.(A) DATED 30/09/2009. Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT DATED 11/09/2020 FILED BY THE OFFICIAL RESPONDENTS IN THE ABOVE OA NO.180/00262/2020.
Annexure R1 OFFICE ORDER ON 25/
Annexure R2 DETAILS NOT GIVEN IN THE ORIGINAL COPY GIVEN
TO THE PETITIONERS.
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE REJOINDER DATED 06/10/2020
IN OA NO.180/00262/2020.
Annexure A22 A TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF ORDER
NO.11015/1/2018-SSS DATED 26/06/2020. Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ADDITIONAL REPLY STATEMENT DATED 21/01/2021 FILED BY THE OFFICIAL RESPONDENTS.
Annexure R3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF STATISTICS AND PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION DATED 11/8/2020.
Annexure R4 TRUE COPY OF THE INSTRUCTIONS ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE DATED 24/5/1993.
Annexure R5 TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD DATED 27/2/2020 (EXTRACT COPIES). OP(CAT)No.47/2021
Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE M.A.NO.170/2021 IN OA NO.180/00262/2020 DATED 24/02/2021 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Annexure A24 A TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.2(5) T & P/TNS/2020-
21 DATED 24/02/2021 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, REGIONAL OFFICE, MINISTRY OF STATISTICS AND PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION, NATIONAL STATISTICAL OFFICE (FIELD OPERATION DIVISION), 2ND FLOOR, R.K.MAHAL, 86, TAMIL SANGHAM ROAD, MADURAI - 625 001.
Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE ADDITIONAL REJOINDER DATED 20TH FEBRUARY, 2021 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ORIGINAL APPLICANT.
Annexure PA23 A TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE, DATED 14/01/2021 ISSUED BY DR.MAMMEN M.JOHN, CONSULTANT NEPHROOLOGIST, REG.NO.20136, MEDICAL TRUST HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF NEPHROLOGY, KOCHI -
Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 14TH FEB 2021 IN OA NO.262 OF 2020.
Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS IN OA 180/00898/2019 DATED 05/01/2020.
Annexure R6A A TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM, ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT UNDER NO.11015/2/2015-SSS DATED 30TH NOVEMBER, 2015.
Annexure R6B A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14/02/2019.
Annexure R6C TRUE COPIES OF THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 24/06/2019.
Annexure R6D TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13/12/2019.
Annexure R6E TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE INDICTING THE HEALTH CONDITION OF THE APPLICANT';S SECOND CHILD.
Annexure R6F TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29/08/2019.
Annexure R6G TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29/08/2019.
Annexure R6H TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE APPLICANT'S SON NOW AGED ABOUT ONE YEAR AND 11 MONTHS.
Annexure R6I TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13/12/2019.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!