Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17896 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2021
Crl.MC No.3902/2021 1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
Wednesday, the 1st day of September 2021 / 10th Bhadra, 1943
CRL.MA.1/2021 IN CRL.MC NO. 3902 OF 2021
CRIME NO.23/2009 OF Pozhiyoor Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram
CC 1592/2019 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II,NEYYATTINKARA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
1. SIVARAJAN AGED 54 YEARS RESIDING AT SIVALAYAM, CHAROTTUKLNAM,
KULATHOOR VILLAGE, UCHAKADA P.O, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THANKASWAMY @ RANGASWAMY S/O CHELLAPPAN, RANTAVILASOM, PLAMOOTTUKADA
P.O, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. USHA D/O KRISHNAMMA, SWAMYAMPRAKASH VILASOM, PERANTHOOR,
PLAMOOTTUKADA P.O, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. KRISHNAMMA D/O CHELLAPPAN, SWAMYAMPRAKASH VILASOM, PERANTHOOR,
PLAMOOTTUKADA P.O, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
5. OMANA D/O CHELLAPPAN, CHANDRA VILASOM, PERANTHOOR, PLAMOOTTUKADA
P.O, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
6. SREEKUMARAN, SON OF MUTHUSWAMI, M.S.BHAVAN, CHENKAL VILLAGE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POZHIYOOR POLICE STATION,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL -695513.
2. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT
OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
3. U.V.MANJUSHA D/O USHA VARGHESE, RESIDING AT USHA NIVAS,
KANCHAMPAZHANJI, KANCHAMPAZHANJI DESOM, THIRUPURAM VILLAGE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695133.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court be
pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to Annexures-II to IV before the Judicial First
Class Magistrate Court-II, Neyyattinkara.
This Crl.MC coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the
arguments of M/S. B.KRISHNA MANI, DHANUJA M.S, Advocates for the petitioners, and of
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the 1st & 2nd respondents, the court passed the following:
ORDER
Considering the averments in the petition, and taking note of the earlier proceedings
between the 1st petitioner and the 3rd respondent and especially the finding of the Family Crl.MC No.3902/2021 2/2
Court in O.P.No.395/2012 (Annexure - IX judgment) that there was no valid marriage between
the 1st petitioner and the 3rd respondent, I am of the view that the petitioners are entitled to
an interim order as prayed for.
Accordingly, there will be an interim order as prayed for, for a period of three months.
01/09/2021
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
Annexures
Annexure II - TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 31/3/2009 IN CRIME NO.23/2009 BEFORE THE POZHIYOOR POLICE STATION.
Annexure III - TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 17/6/2009 SUBMITTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POZHIYOOR POLICE STATION.
Annexure IV - TRUE COPY OF THE PROTEST COMPLAINT C.C.1592/2019 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, NEYYATTINKARA DATED 14.10.2016.
01-09-2021 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!