Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Viswa Niryat Private Ltd vs The Village Officer
2021 Latest Caselaw 17858 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17858 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2021

Kerala High Court
Viswa Niryat Private Ltd vs The Village Officer on 1 September, 2021
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
   WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 10TH BHADRA, 1943
                       WP(C) NO. 9609 OF 2012
PETITIONER:

          VISWA NIRYAT PRIVATE LTD.
          AGED 31 YEARS
          KARUVELIPPADY, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI-4, REPRESENTED BY ITS
          MANAGER BINULAL.

          BY ADV SRI.R.RAMADAS



RESPONDENT:

          THE VILLAGE OFFICER
          THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE, THOPPUMPADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
          KOCHI-4.

          BY ADV.SRI RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE- GOVERNMENT PLEADER




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 9609 OF 2012
                                     2



                               JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction

to the respondent to accept the land tax with respect to his

property comprised of 31 Ares 88 cents in various Survey

Numbers of Thoppumady Village in Kochi, without insisting on

production of the original title deeds. The petitioner says that the

original title deeds are in the custody of a Nationalised Bank as

security for a loan which has been availed; and therefore, that the

respondent is unjustified in asking the same to be produced

before him.

2. When this matter was called today, Sri.R.Ramdas -

learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that, pending this lis,

out of the total extent of 31.88 Ares, the respondent has permitted

remittance of tax with respect to 22.13 Ares and that he is not

aware as to why the tax with respect to the balance property has

not been permitted to be remitted. He, therefore, prayed that this

writ petition be allowed, directing the respondent to accept the tax

for the balance extent also. Alternatively, Sri.R.Ramdas submitted WP(C) NO. 9609 OF 2012

that if the respondent still insists that his client produce the title

documents, then he will obtain certified copies of the same from

the Sub Registrar's Office and prayed that the respondent be

directed not to insist on the originals.

3. In response, the learned Government Pleader -

Sri.Rajeev Jyothish George, submitted that no fault can be

attributed to the respondent in refusing to accept the land tax from

the petitioner because, unless the original documents are

produced, his title to the same cannot be verified. He, therefore,

prayed that this writ petition be dismissed.

4. When I consider the afore submissions, it is ineluctable

that, as per the petitioner, during the pendency of this case, the

respondent has permitted remittance of the land tax with respect

to 22.13 Ares, even without the production of original tittle

documents. Therefore, I fail to understand why the respondent is

refusing remittance of tax with respect to the balance property and

cannot find any reason for him to do so, merely because the

original title documents have not been produced. WP(C) NO. 9609 OF 2012

In the afore circumstances, I order this writ petition and

permit the petitioner to approach the respondent for permission to

pay the land tax with respect to the balance extent of 31.88 Ares;

and if, for any reason, said Authority insists on production of his

title documents, then the petitioner will obtain certified copies of

the same from the Registrar's office and produce it before him,

who will thereupon verify the same and then accept the land tax

with respect to the total extent in terms of law.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE SAS/01/09/2021 WP(C) NO. 9609 OF 2012

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9609/2012

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 15.06.1992 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.1025 OF THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE

Exhibit P1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 15.06.1992 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.1026 OF THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE.

Exhibit P1(B) TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 15.06.1992 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.1027/1,1031/1 AND 2254 OF THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE.

Exhibit P1(C) TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 03.12.1993 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.1025 OF THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE.

Exhibit P1(D) TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 03.12.1993 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.1026 OF THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE.

Exhibit P1(E) TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 03.12.1993 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.1027/1, 1031/1 AND 2245 OF THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE.

Exhibit P1(F) TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 01.12.1994 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.1025 OF THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE.

Exhibit P1(G) TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 01.12.1994 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.1026 OF THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE.

Exhibit P1(H) TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 01.12.1994 IN RESPECT OF SY.NOS.1027/1, 1031/1 AND 2245 OF THOPPUMPADY VILLAGE.

Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20.12.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16.02.2012 BEFORE THE RESPONDENT REQUESTING TO ACCEPT LAND TAX IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter