Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21349 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 37549 OF 2018
PETITIONER:
SHEEJO ANTONY
AGED 42 YEARS
S/O. C.J.ANTONY,
CHAKKIATH MOODA HOUSE,
KARUKUTTY. P.O.,
PIN- 683 576,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV MILLU DANDAPANI
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE SECRETARY,
PARAKKADAVU GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
PARAKKADAVU. P.O,
PIN- 683 579,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
P.W.D. ROADS SUB DIVISION, ALUVA P.O., PIN - 683 101,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD P.O., PIN - 682 030,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
4 INDEPENDENCE ARTS AND SPORTS CLUB,
REG NO. ERM/TC/11/2014, MAMBRA, PARAKKADAVU P.O.,
PIN - 683 579, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.S.RENJITH
SRI.S.UNNIKRISHNAN (NELLAD)
APPU.P.S-GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.37549 OF 2018
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 29th day of October 2021
This writ petition is filed seeking the following
reliefs:-
(i) Call for the records leading the case;
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other
appropriate writ, order or direction directing
respondents 1 to 3 to take immediate action on
Ext.P2 and thereon remove the unauthorized
construction from the road margin;
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Government Pleader as well as the
learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent,
Parakkadavu Grama Panchayath. Though notice had
been taken out to the 4th respondent, there is no
appearance for the 4th respondent.
3. The contention of the petitioner is that an WP(C).No.37549 OF 2018
encroachment has been made by the 4 th respondent by
constructing an Arts and Sports Club in the road
puramboke as is evidenced by Exhibit P1, photographs.
Exhibit P2, detailed representation, has been submitted
by the petitioner before the respondents 1, 2 and 3 and
the petitioner contends that appropriate steps are liable
to be taken by the respondents in accordance with law
in view of the fact that the 4th respondent has evidently
made construction of an Arts and Sports Club in the
road puramboke affecting the PWD road.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the 1st
respondent Panchayath submits that the road in
question is a PWD road and that it is for the 2 nd
respondent to take appropriate steps. Having
considered the contentions advanced, I am of the
opinion that respondents 1 to 3 cannot plead ignorance
and refuse to take any action in view of the fact that
Exhibit P2 complaint has been submitted before them.
There will accordingly be a direction to the concerned WP(C).No.37549 OF 2018
respondents to take up Exhibit P2 representation and to
consider and pass orders on the same with notice to the
petitioner as well as the 4th respondent. In case
encroachment is found, appropriate action will have to
be followed in accordance with law after giving due
notices to the 4th respondent as well. Appropriate steps
shall be taken without delay at any rate within a period
of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE SSK/29/10 WP(C).No.37549 OF 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
TRUE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE UNAUTHORIZED EXHIBIT P1 CONSTRUCTION OF CLUB BUILDING ON THE ROAD MARGIN.
TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 18.07.2018, EXHIBIT P2 SUBMITTED TO THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3. TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 03.08.2018, OF EXHIBIT P3 THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL SSK //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!