Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Aravindakshan Marathezath ... vs Dewan Housing Finance Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 21345 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21345 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2021

Kerala High Court
Aravindakshan Marathezath ... vs Dewan Housing Finance Ltd on 29 October, 2021
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                           PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

 FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1943

                   WP(C) NO. 22086 OF 2021

PETITIONER:

          ARAVINDAKSHAN MARATHEZATH KUNJUNNI
          AGED 70 YEARS,S/O KUNJUNNI,
          MARATHEZATH HOUSE,
          KANNAMKULANGARA P.O.,KOORKENCHERI,
          THRISSUR, KERALA-680 007
          BY ADV K.RAJESH KANNAN


RESPONDENTS:

    1     DEWAN HOUSING FINANCE LTD.
          (INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956),
          HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT WARDEN HOUSE,
          2ND FLOOR, SIR P.M. ROAD,
          FORT MUMBAIR-400 001,
          AND BRANCH OFFICE AT DHFL,
          1ST FLOOR, KKM BUILDING,
          NEAR METRO PLAZA, PALARIVATTOM,
          ERNAKULAM,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER
    2     ARUN KUMAR
          AGED 35 YEARS, S/O ARAVINDAKSHAN,
          MARATHEZATH HOUSE,
          KANNAMKULANGARA P.O, KOORKENCHERI,
          THRISSUR, KERALA-680 007
          BY SRI.PAULOCHAN P. ANTONY,SC


     THIS WRIT PETITION      (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP       FOR
ADMISSION ON 29.10.2021,     THE COURT ON THE SAME        DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.22086/21
                                     -:2:-


                     BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                      -----------------------------------------
                         W.P.(C) No.22086 of 2021
                      ----------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 29th day of October, 2021

                                JUDGMENT

Petitioner as borrower from the respondent bank, has

committed default in repayment. Consequently, proceedings have

been initiated by the bank for recovery of the amounts due.

2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has confined the

relief to an opportunity for repaying the overdue amount in

instalments and to obtain regularisation of the loan account.

3. It was submitted on behalf of the respondent bank that the

petitioner committed default in repayment and the overdue amount is

Rs.19,41,000/-. It was further submitted that though proceedings for

recovery have been initiated, as a matter of indulgence, the

respondent bank is willing to accept repayment of the overdue

amount in limited instalments and regularise the loan account.

4. I have heard Adv.K.Rajesh Kannan, learned counsel for the

petitioner as well as Adv.Paulochan P.Antony, the learned Standing

Counsel for the respondent bank.

W.P.(C) No.22086/21

5. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the

situation now prevailing, apart from the submissions made as

recorded above, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted

an opportunity to repay the overdue amount in nine instalments and

thereafter, if the amount so directed is repaid within the time as

directed above, to have the loan account regularised.

6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent bank

to accept repayment of the entire overdue amount of Rs.19,41,000/-,

along with bank charges from the petitioner and regularise the loan

account of the petitioner on the following conditions:

(i) The overdue amount of Rs.19,41,000/- shall be repaid in nine equated monthly instalments.

(ii) The first instalment of Rs.4,00,000/- shall be paid on or before 30.11.2021 and the balance amount shall be paid in eight equated monthly instalments.

(iii) Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI's along with the instalments directed above.

(iv) In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in W.P.(C) No.22086/21

accordance with law.

(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE vps W.P.(C) No.22086/21

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22086/2021

PETITIONER'S/S' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 3.2.2017 IN WPC NO.752/2017 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 10.11.2017 IN WA NO 2150/2017 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 23.9.2021 ISSUED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THRISSUR IN CRL.M.P. NO 1897/2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter