Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21167 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 28TH ASWINA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 6210 OF 2011
PETITIONERS:
1 JAINLAL J.U.,T.C.31/1583, CHACKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-08.
2 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM JILLA MOTOR &
ENGINEERING MAZDOOR SANGHAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
BIJU.S, BMS BHAVAN, KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-02.
BY ADVS.
SRI.BINU PAUL
SRI.SHAJI THOMAS PORKKATTIL
SRI.SHINE MATHEWS VADAKKEKARA
SRI.T.V.VINU
RESPONDENTS:
1 AIRPORT DIRECTOR,INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
TRIVANDRUM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695008
2 UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, CIVIL AVIATION
GOVT. OF INDIA, RAJIV GANDHI BHAVAN
SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI-110003
*3 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION
KUDAPPANAKKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695043
*(ADDL.R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD.10.3.11 IN
I.A.3978/11)
*4 THE TRIVANRUM AIRPORT TAXI DRIVERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION,
REG.NO.75/1979, T.C.37/997, NAGARCOIL BUILDINGS,
PERUNATHANNI, PALKULANGARA, TRIVANDRUM 695 08
REP.BY SECRETARY
5 THE PRESIDENT, TRIVANDRUM AIRPORT TAXI AND TOURIST TAXI
EMPLOYEES UNION (RTEG.NO.189/79), T.C.35/845, AIRPORT ROAD,
SULAIMAN STREET, VALLAKADAVU PO, TRIVANDRUM 695008
WP(C) NO. 6210 OF 2011 ..2..
6 THE TRIVANDRUM AIPORT TAXI DRIVERS AND CLEANERS
ASSOCIATION, SHANKHUMUGHAM, TRIVANDRUM 695 007,
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAAL SECRETARY
7. THE AIRPORT TAXI DRIVERS AND CLEANERS CONGRESS,
REG.NO.35/848, NEAR AIRPORT, TRIVANDRUM 695 008,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
(* ADDL.R4-R7 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD.04.07.2014
IN I.A.NO.14989/13)
G.P-SRI.K.M.FAISAL
SRI.V.SANTHARAM
SHRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA
SRI.A.CHANDRA BABU
SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIRASST.SOLICITOR
SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL
SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY
SRI.K.L.NARASIMHAN, SC, TVM AIRPORT ATY
SRI.THIRUMALA P.K.MANI
SRI.ZAKEER HUSAIN M.K.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
20.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 6210 OF 2011 ..3..
JUDGMENT
The learned Counsel for the respondents have
objected to the maintainability of the writ petition,
contending that the second petitioner is not a trade union
registered under the Trade Unions Act.
2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner sought time
for producing necessary document to show that the second
petitioner is a trade union registered under the Trade
Unions Act, as averred in the writ petition.
3. In spite of repeated adjournments, the petitioners
have not produced any document to show that the second
petitioner is a trade union registered under the Trade
Unions Act.
In such circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SB/21/10/2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!