Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21100 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 28TH ASWINA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 21200 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
KUMARAMPUTHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
LTD. NO.P-373
MANNARKKAD COLLEGE P.O.,
KUMARAMPUTHUR
PALAKKAD-678 583,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE,
VIJAYAKUMAR K.K.
BY
ADV.HARISANKAR V. MENON
ADV.MEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT DEPUTY/ASST.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER
NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE,
DELHI-110 001.
2 NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE
DELHI-110 001,
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER.
3 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
AYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR,
THRISSUR-680 001.
ADV.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 20.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.21200/21
-:2:-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.21200 of 2021
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 20th day of October, 2021
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society registered
under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. Ext.P1 order of
assessment was issued against the petitioner on 27.08.2021. In the
assessment order, petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P
was rejected on the ground that there was no evidence to show that
petitioner satisfied the ingredients of the Primary Agricultural Credit
Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies
Act.
2. While assailing the assessment order before the 3 rd
respondent, petitioner has sought to canvass that the
judgment of the Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Co-
operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax [2021 (1)
KLT 485] was not considered by the assessing officer though the
assessment order was rendered subsequent to the Supreme Court W.P.(C) No.21200/21
Judgment.
3. Since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal as
Ext.P3 and the same is pending consideration before the 3 rd
respondent, I deem it fit that this writ petition be disposed of directing
the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal in a time bound
manner.
4. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 3 rd respondent to
consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3, as expeditiously as
possible.
5. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be
initiated pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE vps W.P.(C) No.21200/21
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21200/2021
PETITIONER'S/S' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2018-19 DATED 27.8.2021.
EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF WEB PAGE SCREEN SHOT EVIDENCING THE INABILITY TO FILE THE APPEAL.
EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.9.2021.
EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 22.9.2021.
EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF COVERING LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER'S CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT DATED 25.9.2021.
EXHIBIT P6 COPY OF JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO.9007/2021 DATED 16.7.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!