Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21098 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 28TH ASWINA, 1943
CRL.MC NO. 5816 OF 2020
CRIME NO.731/2020 OF KORATTY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
A A
AGED 23 YEARS
X
BY ADV M.J.POLLY
RESPONDENTS/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
2 INSPECTOR OF POLICE
KORATTY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR,
THRISSUR DISTRICT.
3 X X
X
4 Y Y
X
BY ADV.SRI.RENJIT GEORGE.SR.GP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.M.C.NO.5816 OF 2021
-2-
ORDER
Petitioner is the sole accused in crime No.731/2020 of Koratty
police station. This Crl.M.C. has been filed seeking to quash all
further proceedings in the above crime which is registered for the
offence punishable under Section 376(2) of IPC and Section 5j(II)
and 6 of PoCSO Act, 2012.
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner with the
intention and preparation to subject the victim-minor girl to sexual
intercourse, promised to marry her and took her to his house at
Koratti on 06.12.2019 and thereafter impregnated her and thereby
committed the offence as alleged.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, after
the defacto complainant attained majority, the petitioner married
the defacto complainant and now they are living together as
husband and wife. A child is also born out of their wedlock. The
petitioner produced Annexure A-3, the copy of the birth certificate
of the victim girl, which would show that her date of birth is
23.10.2002. Annexure A-4 is the copy of the FIR. Annexure A-5 is
the marriage certificate, which would show that the petitioner
married the defacto complainant on 26.10.2020. CRL.M.C.NO.5816 OF 2021
4. Adv.Jijo Jose appear on behalf of the defacto
complainant. He would submit that the defacto complainant is
present today. The learned Public Prosecutor also submits that the
defacto complainant was present before the Court.
5. The Notary attested affidavit sworn in by the mother of
the victim is produced as Annexure A-1, in which she has
specifically stated that the victim is her daughter and now she is
18 years old and has been married to the petitioner. It is also
stated that the entire issues between the petitioner and the
defacto complainant has been settled and presently she has no
grievance against the petitioner. Annexure A-2 is the affidavit
sworn in by the victim in which she also has categorically stated
that the petitioner married her and she has no grievance against
the petitioner at present and she is not intending to prosecute the
case. The birth certificate of the victim would prove that he has
attained majority and marriage with the petitioner has also been
conducted.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor produced copy of the
marriage certificate of the petitioner and the victim, after attaining
majority, which would prove that the marriage was solemnized at
Kavalamkodam Saktheeswaram Temple on 26.10.2020. Copy of the
marriage certificate issued from the Panchayath also has been CRL.M.C.NO.5816 OF 2021
produced. The statement of the victim recorded by the CPO also
has been produced, in which also, she has categorically stated that
she has no complaint against the petitioner for the time being.
7. The learned counsel for the petitioner brought to my
attention the decision of this Court in Ashiq v. State of Kerala
[2019(2) KLT 1130], wherein this Court had an occasion to consider
an identical situation and held that when parties have amicably
settled the matter and the petitioner married the victim girl, for the
ends of substantial justice, it will be necessary to quash the
proceedings.
8. It is also relevant in this context to quote judgment in
Crl.A.No.1740/2019 [Saju P.R. v. State of Kerala] wherein the
Apex Court while considering an identical situation of a case
involving Section 376 of IPC has held that on the basis of affidavit
filed by the complainant and other materials on record, it would be
proper to quash the criminal proceedings pending against the
accused for doing complete justice to the parties concerned and
accordingly, a Crl.M.C. which was dismissed by this Court on the
ground that offence involved is one under Section 376 of IPC was
ultimately allowed by the Apex Court.
9. A learned Single Judge of this Court in Denu P. Thampi
v. Ms.X and Another [2019 (3) KHC 199] also had occasion to CRL.M.C.NO.5816 OF 2021
consider in a situation, where a case involving 376 of IPC, has been
quashed in view of the subsequent settlement and marriage
between the victim and the accused.
10. In the above backdrop, since the petitioner and the
victim already married the petitioner and they are living together
as husband and wife, I am of the view that it would be just and
proper for doing complete justice to the parties to quash the entire
proceedings pending against the petitioner in crime No.731/2020
of Koratti police station.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands allowed and the further
proceedings in crime No.731/2020 of Koratti police station against
the petitioner is hereby quashed.
Sd/-
M.R.ANITHA JUDGE nkr CRL.M.C.NO.5816 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5816/2020
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE A1 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFACTO COMPLAINANT IN CRIME NO. 731/2020 OF KORATTY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR
ANNEXURE A2 AFFIDAVIT OF THE VICTIM LADY IN CRIME NO.
731/2020 OF KORATTY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR
ANNEXURE A3 COPY OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE VICTIM LADY IN CRIME NO. 731/2020 OF KORATTY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR
ANNEXURE A4 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR NO.731/2020 OF KORATTY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR
ANNEXURE A5 COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE BETWEEN PETITIONER AND VICTIM LADY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!