Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21086 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 28TH ASWINA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 22227 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
HAMZA KUTTY
AGED 64 YEARS
S/O. KUNJALAVI, NURUKANDAN, KUMARAMPUTHUR VILLAGE,
MANNARKAD PALAKKAD - 678583.
BY ADVS.
V.G.ARUN
JAYARAGI.V
NEERAJ NARAYAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT ROOM
NO. 357 (A) & 538, MAIN BLOCK, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.
2 THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER.
OFFICE OF THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC OFFICE
BUILDING, MUSEUM ROAD, OPPOSITE ZOO. VIKAS BHAVAN P.O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA - 695033.
3 DISTRICT COLLECTOR.
CIVIL STATION, KENATHUPARAMBU, KUNATHURMEDU, PALAKKAD,
KERALA - 678013.
4 THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR(L.R)
CIVIL STATION, KENATHUPARAMBU, KUNATHURMEDU, PALAKKAD,
KERALA - 678013.
5 THE VILLAGE OFFICER.,
KUMARAPUTHUR VILLAGE, MANNARKADU, PALAKKAD - 678583.
6 HAMZA
S/O. KUNJAYA ABUBAKER, VELLEKATTU, KUMARAMPUTHUR
VILLAGE, MANNARKADU, PALAKKAD - 678583.
OTHER PRESENT:
WP(C) NO. 22227 OF 2021
2
SMT. K AMMINIKUTTY - SR GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 20.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 22227 OF 2021
3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is stated to be a senior citizen of over
60 years in age, has approached this Court alleging that, even
though a suo motu proceedings has been initiated against him
by the 4th respondent Deputy Collector (Land Reforms) and
numbered as S.M.No.935 of 2014, further action thereon has
not been completed until now. The petitioner, therefore, prays
the 4th respondent be directed to do so and issue appropriate
final orders thereon, within a time frame to be fixed by this
Court.
2. In response, the learned Senior Government Pleader
Smt.K.Amminikutty, submitted that, if the suo motu
proceedings are still pending against the petitioner, the same
can be disposed of by the 4th respondent, within a period of
six months, taking note of the fact that he is a senior citizen.
She, therefore, prayed that this writ petition be ordered only
on such terms.
3. When I consider the afore submissions, it is ineluctable
that if S.M.No.935 of 214 is still pending against the petitioner,
then it will require to be disposed of by the 4th respondent WP(C) NO. 22227 OF 2021
within a period of six months, because this is the time frame
that has been constantly followed by this Court in the case of
senior citizens.
Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, directing the 4 th
respondent to complete proceedings in S.M.No.935 of 2014,
after following due procedure and after affording necessary
opportunity of being heard to the petitioner - as also to any
other interested/affected persons - thus, culminating in an
apposite order thereon, as expeditiously as is possible, but not
later than six months from the date of receipt of a certified
copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE ANB WP(C) NO. 22227 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22227/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION ALONG WITH THE REPORT OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER DATED 29.07.2010.
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BEARING NO. K.R. G7, SM NO. 935/2014 DATED 03.12.2014 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!