Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20944 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 14TH ASWINA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 21261 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
SHAHULHAMEED, THEKKETHADATHIL, THEKETHILMANKUZHI P.O.,
MAVELIKARA, ALAPPUZHA-690558.
BY ADVS.V.G.ARUN (K/795/2004)
V.JAYA RAGI
R.HARIKRISHNAN (KAMBISSERIL)
NEERAJ NARAYAN
SAJEEVAN K.R.
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE
DEPARTMENT ROOM NO.357(A) & 358, MAIN BLOCK,
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER,
OFFICE OF THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC OFFICE
BUILDING, MUSEUM ROAD, OPPOSITE ZOO, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695003.
3 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, BESIDE ZILLA
PANCHAYATH OFFICE, CIVIL STATION WARD, ALAPPUZHA,
KERALA-688001.
4 THE TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, MAVELIKARA, KOTTANADU,
OLD MAVELIKKARA, MAVELIKARA, KERALA-690101.
5 MAVELIKARA TALUK LAND ASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, TAHASILDAR, MAVELIKARA,
TALUK OFFICE, MAVELIKARA, KOTTANADU, OLD MAVELIKKARA,
MAVELIKARA, KERALA-690101.
SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY - SR.GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 21261 OF 2021
-2-
JUDGMENT
The petitioner alleges that, in spite of
Ext.P1 proceedings having been issued by the 5th
respondent - Mavelikara Taluk Land Assignment
Committee as early as on 08.06.2005, no action has
been taken by the competent respondents to issue
Purchase Certificate to him, with respect to the
property comprised of 1.05 Ares in Sy.No.289 of
Block No.6, Vettiyar Village, Alappuzha.
2. The learned Senior Government Pleader -
Smt.K.Amminikutty, submitted that petitioner is
seen to have preferred Ext.P2 representation
before the 2nd respondent - Land Revenue
Commissioner, but that the competent Authority to
consider the same is the 3rd respondent - District
Collector. She submitted that, therefore, the
petitioner may be directed to make a proper
application before the 3rd respondent, so that WP(C) NO. 21261 OF 2021
said Authority can take up the same and dispose it
of, in terms of law.
3. I find some force in the submissions of
the learned Senior Government Pleader as afore;
and am, consequently, of the view that this writ
petition deserves to be allowed with the following
directions.
Resultantly, this writ petition is allowed and
the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the
3rd respondent - District Collector, with an
appropriate application, within a period of one
month from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment; in which event, said Authority will
consider the same, adverting to Ext.P1
recommendations of the 5th respondent - Mavelikara
Taluk Land Assignment Committee, dated 08.6.2005,
and after affording an opportunity of being heard
to the petitioner; thus culminating in an apposite
order thereon, as expeditiously as is possible, WP(C) NO. 21261 OF 2021
but not later than one month after the afore
application is received.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE akv WP(C) NO. 21261 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21261/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE LAND TALUK ASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE COVENANTED IN 8.6.2005 AT TALUK OFFICE MAVELIKARA.
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26.8.2021 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS : NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!