Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Don Paul vs Tisa Don @ Tisa Palackal Kuriakose
2021 Latest Caselaw 20704 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20704 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2021

Kerala High Court
Don Paul vs Tisa Don @ Tisa Palackal Kuriakose on 5 October, 2021
Con.Case(C) No.845/2021                       1/5

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                            PRESENT
                          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
                                               &
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
             Tuesday, the 5th day of October 2021 / 13th Aswina, 1943
             CONTEMPT CASE(C) NO. 845 OF 2021(S) IN OP (FC) 281/2019
   PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

           DON PAUL, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. LATE PAUL PAUL,
           THENGUMAPALLY HOUSE, MANJOOR P.O., MANJOOR VILLAGE,
           KOTTAYAM-686 603.

        BY ADVS. M/S.ARUN MATHEW VADAKKAN, GERRY DOUGLES S.
   ALLEGED CONTEMPTOR/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

           TISA DON @ TISA PALACKAL KURIAKOSE, AGED 32 YEARS,
           D/O. GEORGE KURIAKOSE, PALACKAL HOUSE, BUS STAND ROAD,
           VAIKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 141.

        This Contempt of court case (civil) having come up for orders on
   05.10.2021, the court on the same day passed the following:

                                                             P.T.O.
 Con.Case(C) No.845/2021                       2/5




                     ALEXANDER THOMAS & N.NAGARESH, JJ.
             ================================================
                          Cont. Case (C) No. 845 of 2021
            [arising out of impugned judgment dated 7.5.2019 in OP(FC) No. 281 of 2019]
             ===============================================
                       Dated this the 5th day of October, 2021

                                            ORDER

Heard Sri.Arun Mathew Vadakkan, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner. Though the petitioner's counsel has served notice on the alleged

contemnor/respondent in this Contempt case on Sri.Abraham P.George,

learned counsel who appeared for that party at the OP(FC) stage, the said

advocate has not entered appearance.

2. It is urged by Sri.Arun Mathew Vadakkan, learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner that the specific direction issued by this Court

in Anx.A-1 judgment dated 7.5.2019 in OP(FC) Nos. 281 & 274 of 2019, as

contained in para 4 on pages 6 & 7 thereof, was to the effect that the child

shall be produced by the wife on all alternate Sundays in the St.George

Church, Thalayolaparambu from 2 P.M. to 4.30 P.M. for the interaction of

the child with the petitioner in the presence of the priest or any other person

authorised by the priest, as already ordered by the Family Court in the

impugned order. Further, it is stated by the petitioner that the said

directions of this Court in Anx.A-1 judgment have been consistently violated

by the respondent herein (wife) for 6 consecutive months from June, 2020 Con.Case(C) No.845/2021 3/5

Cont. Case (C) No. 845 of 2021

to November, 2020, wherein visitation on every alternate Sundays have

been totally denied to the petitioner, and the petitioner was never even

allowed to have a telephonic contact with the ward. Averments to that effect

are made in para 7 of this Contempt petition. Further, it is averred in para 9

of the Contempt petition that the alleged contemnor again started violating

the abovesaid order of this Court at Anx.A-1 from April, 2021 till date, etc.

3. In view of these aspects, the Contempt of Court case will stand

admitted. Issue notice to the alleged contemnor/respondent herein by speed

post returnable within 2 weeks. The petitioner's counsel is permitted to

serve copy of this order to Sri.Abraham P.George, learned counsel who

appeared for the respondent herein at the OP(FC) stage.

4. The alleged contemnor/respondent herein will immediately

ensure that the child is produced at the above venue (St.George Church,

Thalayolaparambu) on 24.10.2021 (Sunday) between 2 P.M. and 4.30 P.M.

so that the petitioner will get the benefit of interaction with the child in the

presence of the priest or any other person authorised by the priest, as

directed in Anx.A-1.

5. Further, the alleged contemnor/respondent will personally

appear before this Court along with the child on the next posting date.

The petitioner shall also be present on the said day before this Court as well.

Con.Case(C) No.845/2021 4/5

Cont. Case (C) No. 845 of 2021

6. The Registry will forward a copy of this order to the respondent

herein while serving notice in this Contempt petition.

List the case at 1.20 P.M. in the Chambers on 28.10.2021.

Hand over to both sides.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE

Sd/-

                                                              N.NAGARESH, JUDGE


         MMG




05-10-2021                            /True Copy/                           Assistant Registrar
 Con.Case(C) No.845/2021                 5/5

                          APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 845/2021
ANNEXURE A1               CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED
                          07.05.2019 IN OP(FC) NO.281/2019.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter