Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sojan Varghese vs Samol
2021 Latest Caselaw 20608 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20608 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2021

Kerala High Court
Sojan Varghese vs Samol on 5 October, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
                              &
        THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
  TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 13TH ASWINA, 1943
                   OP (FC) NO. 260 OF 2020
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN O.P.No.243/2017 OF FAMILY
                COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/S:

    1     SOJAN VARGHESE, AGED 45 YEARS,
          S/O.VARGHESE, PUDUSSERY PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE,
          NADUKANI KARA, KEERAMPARA VILLAGE,
          KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK, PIN-686691.
    2     ALEYAMMA, AGED 68 YEARS,
          W/O. VARGHESE, PUDUSSERY PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE,
          NADUKANI KARA, KEERAMPARA VILLAGE,
          KOTHAMANGLAM TALUK, PIN-686691.
          BY ADVS.
          V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR)
          SRI.N.RAJESH


RESPONDENT/S:

          SAMOL, AGED 39 YEARS,
          D/O.THOMAS, KALLENKURIYIL HOUSE,
          KOTTAPPADY VILLAGE, VADAKKUMBHAGOM KARA,
          KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK - 686692.
          BY ADVS.
          SRI.K.V.SURESH KUMAR
          SRI.ANISH PAUL


THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.10.2021, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal NO..259/2019, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(FC) No.260/2020 & Mat.Appeal No.259/2019       2




               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                        PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
                                                &
            THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
    TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 13TH ASWINA, 1943
                           MAT.APPEAL NO.259 OF 2019
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 243/2017 OF FAMILY COURT,
                            MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/S:

      1        SOJAN VARGHESE, AGED 44 YEARS,
               S/O.VARGHESE, PUDUSSERY PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE,
               NADUKANI KARA, KEERAMPARA VILLAGE,
               KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK.
      2        ALEYAMMA, AGED 67 YEARS
               W/O. VARGHESE, PDUDSSERY PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE,
               NADUKANI KARA, KEERAMPARA VILLAGE,
               KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK.
               BY ADVS.
               V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR)
               N.RAJESH

RESPONDENT/S:

               SAMOL, AGED 38 YEARS,
               D/O THOMAS, KALLENKURIYIL HOUSE,
               KOTTAPADI VILLAGE, VADAKKUMBHAGOM KARA,
               KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK-686 692.
               BY ADVS.
               SMT.RESMI THOMAS
               SRI.K.V.SURESH KUMAR
               SRI.C.V.SHAJU
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
05.10.2021, ALONG WITH OP (FC).260/2020, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(FC) No.260/2020 & Mat.Appeal No.259/2019   3




                                      JUDGMENT

[OP (FC) No.260/2020, Mat.Appeal No.259/2019]

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.

These matters are between the same parties. For brevity, the

parties are referred to with reference to the status in Mat.Appeal

No.259 of 2019.

2. The appellants herein are the respondents in O.P.No.243

of 2017 on the file of the Family Court, Muvattupuzha.

3. The Family Court appointed an Advocate Commissioner

to record the evidence of both parties. It appears that the

appellants remained absent to cross-examine the respondent.

4. Based on the fact that the respondent was not cross-

examined and placing reliance on the oral testimony of PWs 1 and

2 and also relying on the documentary evidence of Exts.A1 to A3,

the Family Court allowed the claim of the respondent to realise the

gold ornaments and money.

O.P.(FC) No.260/2020 & Mat.Appeal No.259/2019 4

5. It is to be noted that the appellants were not set ex parte.

The Family Court granted the decree on merits.

6. On going through the impugned judgment itself, we find

there was no appreciation of the pleadings or the evidence

adduced in the matter. Merely for the reason that the witnesses

were not cross-examined, the court cannot grant a decree without

entering into a finding.

7. The Original Petition No.260 of 2020 was filed

challenging execution proceedings.

8. We cannot ignore the latches on the part of the appellants

in contesting the matter. We are of the view that the matter has to

be remanded for consideration on merits. We are also of the view

that the present dilemma was created by the appellants as they

failed to appear before the Advocate Commissioner for cross-

examination. Therefore, we are of the view that the remand

should be on payment of cost. The appellants are directed to pay a O.P.(FC) No.260/2020 & Mat.Appeal No.259/2019 5

cost of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand only) to the

respondent. The cost shall be paid through the counsel appearing

before this Court within two weeks. The appellants shall produce

the receipt before the Family Court. The parties are directed to

appear before the Family Court on 01.11.2021. If any of the

parties cannot appear before the Family Court physically, the

Family Court shall allow such parties to appear online. The

impugned judgment is set aside based on the payment of cost as

above. The attachment already effected will continue till the

disposal of the original petition before the Family Court. The

Mat.Appeal is allowed. The original petition filed challenging the

execution proceedings has thus become infructuous. No order as

to costs.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE ln O.P.(FC) No.260/2020 & Mat.Appeal No.259/2019 6

APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 260/2020

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE IN OP NO.243/17 DATED 19.12.2018 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP NO.243/2017 DATED 19.12.2018 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN IA NO.02/2019 IN MAT APPEAL NO.259/19 DATED 17.01.2020.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF EP NO.16/2019 IN OP NO.243/2017 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE IN EP NO.16/19 IN OP NO.243/17 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 15.05.2019.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF EA NO.32/19 IN EP NO.16/19 IN OP NO.243/2017 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF EA NO.10/2020 IN EP NO.16/19 IN OP NO.243/2017 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO.3981/2005 DATED 04.06.2005 OF KOTHAMANGALAM SRO.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT IN RESPECT OF LOAN NO.8933 DATED 04.02.2020 ISSUED FROM KEERAMPARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK. EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF FAIR VALUE STATEMENT OF THE PROPERTY IN SY NO.326 OF KEERAMPARA VILLAGE. EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN EA NO.10/2020 IN EP NO. 16/19 IN OP NO.243/2017 DATED 29.02.2020 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA. EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28.02.2020 IN OP NO.408/2016 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter