Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Reseena K.P vs Hafsath K
2021 Latest Caselaw 20569 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20569 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2021

Kerala High Court
Reseena K.P vs Hafsath K on 1 October, 2021
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1002 OF 2021

                                  1




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
  FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 9TH ASWINA, 1943
                   CON.CASE(C) NO. 1002 OF 2021
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 10106/2021 OF HIGH
                     COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER:

            RESEENA K.P.
            AGED 39 YEARS
            W/O. ABDULLAKUTTY, RUSDA RESIDENANCE, ETTAYAR,
            PAVANNORMOTTA POST, KANNUR-670602.
            BY ADV J.J.LAKSHMANA IYER


RESPONDENT:

            HAFSATH K
            AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
            PETITIONER, NOW WORKING AS SECRETARY,
            KUTTIYATTUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KUTTIYATTUR,
            KANNUR-670602.
            BY ADVS.
            PREMAN K.P
            SC FOR KUTTIYATTUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH


      THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 01.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1002 OF 2021

                                      2




                      BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                   ................................................
                   Con.Case(Civil)No.1002 of 2021
                   ...........................................
                Dated this the 1st day of october, 2021

                                 JUDGMENT

The contempt petition was filed

alleging violation of the interim order dated

27/4/2021. Pursuant to notice issued to the

respondent, an affidavit has been filed, stating

that, the respondent had been issued with the

licence, copy of which is produced as annexure-

R1 and had also obtained sanitary fitness

certificate a copy of which is produced as

annexure -R2. In view of the afore said

documents, it is evident that no violation of

the interim order has taken place.

Accordingly the contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter