Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20485 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2021/9TH ASWINA, 1943
W.P.(C)NO.20721 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
ALICE VARGHESE, AGED 57 YEARS,
KURUMTHODATH HOUSE, MANNANCHERRY P.O.,
ALAPPUZHA-688 538.
BY ADV.JOBY CYRIAC
RESPONDENTS:
1 SREEKANDAMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
LIMITED, NO.974, MUTTATHIPARAMBU P.O.,
CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA 688 527,
REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR.
2 THE ADMINISTRATOR,
SREEKANDAMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE
BANK LIMITED, NO.974, MUTTATHIPARAMBU P.O.,
CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA 688 527.
3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR, (GENERAL),
OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL),
CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA 688 011.
4 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANNTHAPURAM-695 001.
BY ADV. S.KRISHNA
SRI.JIMMY GEORGE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.20271 of 2021
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is an employee of the
first respondent co-operative bank working
as its secretary-in-charge and was promoted
from time to time. While working as
accountant, was demoted as Junior Clerk
owing to the punishment order dated
10.5.2014 which was challenged before the
Board of Directors by way of an appeal and
then, with Co-operative Arbitration Court.
The Arbitration Court vide award dated
17.7.2019 set aside the orders of the
President and the Board of Directors and
restored the petitioner's service as
accountant with retrospective effect. During
the interregnum, the second respondent/
Administrator on 31.5.2018 appointed the W.P.(C) No.20271 of 2021
petitioner as Secretary-in-charge of the Co-
operative Society with effect from 1.6.2018
vide Ext.P2. Claiming promotion to the post
of the Secretary, the petitioner submitted a
representation dated 28.12.2020, vide
Ext.P4, as she is eligible, but the same is
pending consideration. It is submitted that
the petitioner would be satisfied in case
the writ petition is disposed of by issuing
directions to the second respondent for
disposal of the representation.
Heard counsel on either side.
Without expressing anything on the merit
of the matter, considering the fact that the
petitioner has made a request for promotion
as secretary and holding the charge of the
same, let the respondent No.2 to take a call
on the representation after affording W.P.(C) No.20271 of 2021
opportunity of hearing, in accordance with
law. Let this exercise be undertaken within
a period of two months from the date of
receipt of the certified copy of this order.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
ss JUDGE
W.P.(C) No.20271 of 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20721/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD DATED 17.07.2019 IN ARC NO. 39/2015 PASSED BY THE CO OPERATIVE ARBITRATION COURT.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE IST RESPONDENT CO OPERATIVE BANK, DATED 31.05.2018.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE FEEDER CATEGORY REGULATION OF HE IST RESPONDENT CO OPERATIVE BANK.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.12.2020.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!