Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suresh.K vs The State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 20440 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20440 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2021

Kerala High Court
Suresh.K vs The State Of Kerala on 1 October, 2021
W.P(C).25890/2017
                                  1


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
      FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 9TH ASWINA, 1943
                       WP(C) NO. 25890 OF 2017
PETITIONER:

            SURESH.K, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O KARUNAKARAN,
            CHARIVUKALAYIL HOUSE,RANNI-PERUNAD PO, PIN.689711,
            PRESENTLY WORKING AS PUMP OPERATOR AT PERUNAD PUMP
            HOUSE, P.H SECTION,KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,
            VADASSERIKKARA.

            BY ADV SRI.V.SETHUNATH


RESPONDENTS:

     1      THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO
            WATER RESOURCES(IRRIGATION & WATER SUPPLY B)
            DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN.695001.

     2      THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN,
            VELLAYAMBALAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN.695033.

     3      THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA
            BHAVAN,VELLAYAMBLAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN.695033.

     4      THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION,
            KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,PATHANAMTHITTA. PIN.689645.

     5      THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH
            DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, RANNI.PIN.689673.

     6      THE ASST. ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, KERALA
            WATERAUTHORITY, VADASSERIKKARA, PIN.689662.

            BY ADVS. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
            SRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY


OTHER PRESENT:
 W.P(C).25890/2017
                                2



            GP. ADV.PARVATHY KOTTOL


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 07.09.2021, THE COURT ON 01.10.2021 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P(C).25890/2017
                                     3



                              JUDGMENT

The petitioner has been working as the Pump Operator of

Perunad Pump House under the respondents from 01.03.1995

onwards. According to the petitioner, from 2003 onwards, the work of

the petitioner was changed to contract employment. However, he was

not allowed to sign in the register after 2003, but he was directed to

continue to work on contract employment. He relies on Ext.P1

certificate issued by the Assistant Engineer of Water Authority and

true copy of the extracts of the attendance register from 01.03.1995

to 2002, which is produced as Ext.P2, to substantiate his employment

from 1995 onwards.

2. Claiming that he had completed 20 years of service in

Kerala Water Authority as Pump Operator and on the basis of a

contention that the employees similar to the petitioner were granted

favourable orders, directing them to be absorbed in regular service,

by virtue of Ext.P4 and Ext.P5 judgments of this court, the petitioner

applied for absorbing him as a permanent employee. He submitted

Ext.P7 representation. Since it was not disposed of, he submitted

W.P(C).No.26390 of 2015 before this Court. It was disposed of by

Ext.P8 judgment, directing the authorities to pass orders after hearing

the petitioner. Accordingly, Ext.P9 order was passed declining his

request for absorption. It was held in Ext.P9 that, he was a labourer W.P(C).25890/2017

supplied by the contractor for pumping duty and his engagement was

not on CLR basis. As per the then existing Rule, only CLR hands could

be converted to NMR on completion of 240 days of CLR service within

a period of 12 months. Accordingly, Ext.P7 representation was

rejected.

3. Challenging it, petitioner approached this Court by filing

W.P(C).No.1860 of 2016. It was disposed of by Ext.P10 judgment

directing the authority to consider afresh. Ext.P11 is the order passed

accordingly,. This is under challenge in this proceeding.

4. The prayer sought in the Writ Petition is to quash Exts.P9

and P11 and to direct respondent 1 to 3 to regularize petitioner as

Pump Operator in the light of Exts.P4 and P5 judgments of this Court

and Ext.P6 Government Order, without insisting for possession of a

qualification, with effect from 01.01.1995.

5. Ext.P9 shows that, Ext.P7 representation was rejected on

the ground that, he was a labourer supplied by the contractor for

pumping duty and his engagement was not on CLR basis. It was held

that, as per the existing Rules, CLR hands could only be converted to

NMR on completion of 240 days of CLR service within a continuous

period of 12 months. Ext.P11 order shows that, as per Government

Orders referred to in Ext.P11, only those persons in NMR category

appointed prior to 22.05.1990 alone were entitled to benefit of order W.P(C).25890/2017

No.77/2015 dated 12.08.2015. Since the petitioner was engaged from

1995 onwards under various contractors and receiving wages directly

from contractors, he was not included in CLR service. Hence, he is

not governed by the Government Order dated 12.08.2015.

6. Evidently, in Exts.P9 and P11, the respondents proceeded

on the basis that, he was engaged from 1995 under the contractor.

This seems to be factually incorrect. Ext.P1 clearly shows that, he

was working in the Water Authority. There is no reference that, he

was working under a contractor. Further, Ext.P2 records maintained

in the Water Authority itself shows that, from 01.03.1995 to November

2002, petitioner had signed the records of the Water Authority and his

name, the starting time and stopping time with hours of pumping and

signature were seen recorded in the register. There is absolutely no

indication in Ext.P2 that, he was employed under the contractor. Even

if assuming that, he was posted directly under the contractor after

2001, it is not clear under what circumstance such records were

generated. That liability cannot be cast on the employee. It is for the

Water Authority to explain, and if they are unable to explain, no

presumption against the employee can be drawn. The nature of his

employment after 2001 is also not clearly discernible. Evidently, in

the light of these factual aspects, I feel that, the first respondent is

liable to consider this in the light of Exts.P4 and P5 judgments, W.P(C).25890/2017

coupled with Ext.P12 order produced in the Writ Petition. The first

respondent shall specifically consider these aspects and pass orders

afresh within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy

of this judgment. The petitioner shall also be given a reasonable

opportunity of being heard, either physically and if not possible,

through virtual mode. Ext.P11 stands set aside to this extent.

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of, with directions.

Sd/-

SUNIL THOMAS JUDGE Sbna W.P(C).25890/2017

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25890/2017

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF T HE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE THEN ASST. ENGINEER, P.H SECTION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, VADASSERIKKARA.

EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SOME OF THE EXTRACTS OF THE ATTENDANCE REGISTER FROM 1.3.1995 TO 2002 KEPT AT PERUNAD PUMP HOUSE.

EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE RANNI-PERUNAD GRAMA PANCHAYAT.

EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT IN O.P NO.24590 OF 1998.

EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT IN WP(C) NO.28851 OF 2013(F) DATED 24.4.2010.

EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(MS) NO.77/15/WRD DATED 12.8.2015.

EXHIBIT P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATIONS FILED BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3

EXHIBIT P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT IN WP(C) NO.26390 OF 2015.

EXHIBIT P9 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT AS G.O.(RT) NO.1101/2015/WRD DATED 18.12.2015.

EXHIBIT P10 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT IN WP(C) NO.1860 OF 2016.

EXHIBIT P11 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 11.1.2017.

EXHIBIT P12 THE TRUE COPY OF TEH G.O.(MS) NO.53/2005/WRD DATED 21.10.2005.

W.P(C).25890/2017

EXHIBIT P13 THE TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(MS)NO.37/2017/WRD DATED 2.6.2017 ALONG WITH THE CABINET NOTING FOR THE G.O.

EXHIBIT P14 THE TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(MS) NO.18/2017/WRD DATED 7.4.2017.

EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT IN WP9C) NO.21700 OF 2009.

EXHIBIT P16 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER RIGHT TO INFORAMTION ACT, 2005 BY MADHU.E.K. AND THE ANSWER GIVEN BY THE CONCERNED EXECUTIVE ENGINEERS OF THE WATER AUTHORITY.

EXHIBIT P17 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 3.3.2003 PREPARED AND SIGNED BY THEN ASSISTANT ENGINEER TO THE RANNI PERUNAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH

EXHIBIT P18 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE RANNI PERUNAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 10.9.2015

EXHIBIT P19 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE MEMEBER OF LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF RANNI CONSTITUENCY DATED 19.9.2017

EXHIBIT P20 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SECOND LETTER ISSUED BY THE MEMBER OF LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF RANNI CONSTITUENCY DATED 21.11.2018

EXHIBIT P21 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BNY THE PANCHAYATH MEMBER OF THE RANNI PERUNAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 19.11.2015

EXHIBIT P22 THE TRUE COPY OF THE GO(MS) NO 06/2013 DATED 16.1.2013

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT R1(a) : TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SUBMITTED BY SRI.R.NEELAKANDAN, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P H SECTION

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter