Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23755 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
OP(CRL.) NO. 456 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.10.2021 IN M.P.NO.378/2021 IN
M.C.NO.172/2021 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
ARATHI NAIR,
AGED 38 YEARS,
D/O.K.RAVEENDRAN NAIR, INDIVARAM,
CHIRANGALAM, KELLETTUMKARA, IRINJALAKUDA,
THRISSUR NOW RESIDING AT VINUVIHAR,
PALLIPPURAM P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA,PIN-688 541
BY ADV K.RAMANADHAN
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
PRAMEELA.P,
65 YEARS,W/O.RAVEENDRAN NAIR, INDEEVARAM, ALOOR
VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM VILLAGE DESAM, KALLETTUMKARA,
THRISSUR DISTRICT NOW RESIDING AT C/O. SURESHKUMAR,
INDEEVARAM, ALOOR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM VILLAGE DESAM,
KALLETTUMKARA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT,
KERALA STATE-680 683
THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
O.P.(Crl.) No.456 of 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 30th day of November, 2021
The Original Petition is filed seeking to set aside an order
passed by Family Court, Irinjalakuda (for short 'the court
below') granting interim maintenance allowance and to direct
that court to provide sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to
file her objections in M.P.No.378/2021 in M.C.No.172/2021
pending on it's files.
2. Parties to this O.P(Crl.) will hereinafter be referred to
as the petitioner and the respondent in accordance with their
status in the M.P. before the court below.
3. A report is called for from the court below. The
Judicial Officer concerned has reported that M.C was filed on
24.09.2021 and was posted for appearance of the respondent
to 18.10.2021. Notice was served on the respondent, but she
remained absent. Interim maintenance allowance was allowed
by an order passed in M.P.No.378/2021 on the day itself duly
considering the affidavit filed by the petitioner wherein it was O.P.(Crl.) No.456 of 2021
stated that the respondent was an officer of Malabar Cements
and getting Rs.1,00,000/- monthly as salary. According to him,
since the respondent has not turned up after receipt of the
notice on the day scheduled for her appearance and failed to
file a counter statement that M.P. was considered on the day
itself and an order was passed granting Rs.5,000/- as interim
maintenance allowance.
4. In the order under challenge only a meagre sum of
Rs.5,000/- was ordered as interim maintenance allowance that
too, in favour of a hapless lady aged 65 years. Moreover by the
interim order, an aged mother was allowed to receive
Rs.5,000/- as monthly maintenance allowance from a daughter
employed and therefore this Court finds no reason to interfere
with. The respondent would get opportunity to file counter
statement and documents to substantiate her contentions in
the M.C wherein a final order is yet to be passed. The court
below shall grant reasonable opportunity to the respondent to
file her counter statement and adduce relevant evidence before
passing any final orders in the M.C. O.P.(Crl.) No.456 of 2021
With the above observations, the O.P(Crl.) stands
disposed of.
sd/-
MARY JOSEPH JUDGE NAB O.P.(Crl.) No.456 of 2021
APPENDIX OF OP(CRL.) 456/2021
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MC 172/2021 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM MAINTENANCE APPLICATION MP 378/2021 IN MC 172/2021 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA EXHIBIT P3 THE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED FORM THE FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA IN MC 172/2021 CALLING UPON THE PETITIONER HEREIN TO ATTEND THE FAMILY COURT, ON 18.10.2021
EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY THE VAKALATH FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN MC 172 ON 16.10.2021 WITH CF NO.7105/21
EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF CASES THAT WERE TO BE CALLED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA ON 18.10.2021 THAT WAS PUBLISHED
EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF CASES THAT WERE TO BE CALLED BEFORE THE C.M.O.(CHIEF MINISTERIAL OFFICER ) OF FAMILY COURT IRINJALAKUDA ON 18.10.2021
EXHIBIT P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN MP 378/2021 DATED 18.10.2021 IN MC 172/201 BY THE FAMILY COURT IRINJALAKUDA
EXHIBIT P8 THE TRUE COPY OF MP 426/2021 FILED BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT WITHOUT SERVING COPY TO THE PETITIONERS COUNSEL TO CALL THE CASE IN OPEN COURT, DATED 16.10.2021
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P A TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!