Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23751 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
CRL.MC NO. 5377 OF 2021
(CRIME NO. 634 OF 2018 OF VADAKKANCHERRY POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 202/2019 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS
COURT - V, PALAKKAD / IV ADDITIONAL MACT, PALAKKAD
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 3:
1 RAMSHEED
AGED 20 YEARS
S/O. MUSTAFA, CHEERAKUZHY, KIZHAKKANCHERRY, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.
2 RAMSHAD
AGED 23 YEARS
S/O. MUSTAFA, CHEERAKKUZHY, KIZHAKKANCHERRY, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.
3 SHAKEER @ CHANTHU
AGED 22 YEARS
S/O. BASHEER, CHEERAKKUZHY, KIZHAKKANCHERRY, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)
RESPONDENTS/DE FACTO COMPLAINANT AND STATE:
1 SHEFEER
AGED 31 YEARS
S/O. SHAHUL HAMEED, NINAMKAD, KIZHAKKENCHERRY, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD-
678 684
2 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM-682 031.
BY ADV UNNI SEBASTIAN KAPPEN
ADV.C.S.HRITHWIK (SR.GP)
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.11.2021, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.No. 5377 OF 2021
2
ORDER
Petitioners are the accused in S.C. No. 202 of 2019 pending
before the Additional Sessions Court-V, Palakkad, which arose
from the final report in Crime No. 634 of 2018 of Vadakkancherry
police station. Petitioners face allegations under Sections 341,
323, 324, 506 (ii), 308 read with Section 34 of the IPC.
2. It is alleged that on 03.05.2018 at 10.45 pm accused
persons, in furtherance of their common intention, wrongfully
restrained the de facto complainant, who is CW1 Shafeer in the
charge sheet, and threatened him with a granite piece; the 1 st
accused had hit him with a granite piece on the head; had he not
evaded it, that would have resulted in fatal injuries on him. On the
conclusion of investigation, the charge sheet has been laid. Now
the petitioners have moved this Court for quashing the
proceedings under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. contending that the
matter is settled with the de facto complainant, the 1st respondent.
3. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the
learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor also confirmed the Crl.M.C.No. 5377 OF 2021
settlement reached with the 1st respondent. Moreover, Annexure B
affidavit indicates that the 1st respondent and the petitioners are
friends and the dispute had arisen out of temperamental
differences and now the matter has been settled and he does not
have any subsisting grievance against the petitioners. He has no
objection in quashing the proceedings. In the light of the clear
statement of the de facto complainant, and having regard to the
fact that the 1st respondent did not suffer any serious injuries in
the occurrence, there is no impediment in quashing the
proceedings, accepting the settlement.
5. In the result, entire proceedings in S.C. No. 202 of 2019
pending before the Additional Sessions Court-V, Palakkad are
quashed and the petitioners shall stand exonerated.
The Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed as above.
Sd/-
K. HARIPAL JUDGE RMV/30/11/2021 Crl.M.C.No. 5377 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5377/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
Annexure A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.634/2018 OF VADAKKANCHERRY POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD WHICH IS NOW PENDING AS S.C.NO.202/2019 OF THE COURT OF ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-V (FAST TRACK NO.III), PALAKKAD.
Annexure B AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE IST RESPONDENT HEREIN EVIDENCING THE AFORESAID SETTLEMENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!