Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23386 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 26626 OF 2021
PETITIONER :
THE ELAMKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.F 1536,
KUNNAKKAVU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENTS :
1 THE NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE,
NEW DELHI-110 001, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF
COMMISSIONER.
2 THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST. COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER,
NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE,
NEW DELHI-110 001.
3 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD (4),
TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 001.
SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 26626 OF 2021
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
W.P.(C) No.26626 of 2021
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this the 25th day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society
registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. Ext.P1
order of assessment was issued against the petitioner on
21.09.2021. In the assessment order, petitioner's claim for deduction
under Section 80P was rejected on the ground that there was no
evidence to show that petitioner satisfied the ingredients of the
Primary Agricultural Credit Society as contemplated under the Kerala
Co-operative Societies Act.
2. While assailing the assessment order before the first
respondent, petitioner has sought to canvass that the judgment of
the Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v.
Commissioner of Income Tax [2021 (1) KLT 485] was not
considered by the assessing officer though the assessment order was
rendered subsequent to the Supreme Court Judgment.
3. Since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal as
Ext.P3 and the same is pending consideration before the first WP(C) NO. 26626 OF 2021
respondent, I deem it fit that this writ petition be disposed of
directing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal in a time
bound manner.
4. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the first
respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3, as
expeditiously as possible.
5. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be
initiated against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE RKM WP(C) NO. 26626 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26626/2021
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
Exhibit P1 COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 21.09.2021 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2-14-15.
Exhibit P2 COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 21.09.2021 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DEMANDING TAX.
Exhibit P3 COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 18.10.2021 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2014-15.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!