Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Neethu K Murali vs Eriyad Service Co Operative Bank ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 22845 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22845 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2021

Kerala High Court
Neethu K Murali vs Eriyad Service Co Operative Bank ... on 23 November, 2021
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
                                     &
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
       Tuesday, the 23rd day of November 2021 / 2nd Agrahayana, 1943

                            WA NO. 1537 OF 2021

   AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 27.10.2021 IN WPC NO.22933/2021 OF THIS COURT.

                                   ---

APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN WP(C)22933/2021:

 NEETHU K.MURALI,AGED 28 YEARS,D/O.MURALEEDHARAN K.A.,

 KODUMADATHIL HOUSE,VALLIVATTOM P.O.,THRISSUR.

BY ADVS.M/S.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR, P.R.REENA,

P.S.SIDHARTHAN & MAYA M.

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP(C)22933/2021:

1.ERIYAD SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,ERIYAD P.O.,

  THRISSUR DISTRICT,PIN-680666,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2.ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,

  KODUNGALLUR,THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680664.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R2.


     Prayer for interim relief in the Writ Appeal stating that in the
circumstances stated in the appeal memorandum, the High Court be pleased
to direct the 1st respondent to reinstate the appellant in accordance with
Ext.P7 in service, pending disposal of the above writ appeal.


     This Writ Appeal coming on for orders on 23/11/2021 upon perusing
the appeal memorandum, the court on the same day passed the following:


                                                                       P.T.O.
 EXT.P7:TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 06.10.2021

ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

                             ---
        ALEXANDER THOMAS & VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ.
       ===================================
              Writ Appeal No.1537 of 2021
   (arising out of the judgment dated 27.10.2021 in WP(C) No.22933/2021)
  =========================================
       Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2021

                               ORDER

Issue notice before admission to R1 (Co-operative Society). It shall be

served by the Appellant's Counsel by serving notice on the learned

Sr.Government Pleader who will ensure that notice on R1 Co-operative

Society is served through the liaison official of the Co-operation

Department attached to the Office of the Advocate General as well as the

Local Assistant Registrar/Joint Registrar of the above said Society.

2. After service of notice, the liaison official of the Co-operation

Department attached to the Office of the Advocate General will file a memo

through the learned Sr.Government Pleader about due service of notice on

R1. The liaison official and the Assistant Registrar may intimate R1-Co-

operative Society, about the pendency of this WA to alert them to make

arrangements to enter appearance through the learned Advocate of their

choice well before the next posting date. Learned Sr.Government Pleader

has taken notice for R2 (Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies).

3. The learned Sr.Government Pleader will get specific Writ Appeal No.1537 of 2021

instructions from the competent authority of the State Government in the

Social Justice Department, as to which are the sub-categories of physically

disabled candidates who are made eligible and suitable for appointment to

the post of LD clerk, Section Assistant etc., and whether the sub-category

of visually impaired candidates are eligible and suitable for such lateral

reservation for PD candidates for appointment to such posts and if so,

whether there is any maximum degree of visual disability that is prescribed

for such suitability and eligibility etc. A copy of Government

norm/Government Order prescribing such norms in the matter of

identification of such suitability for PD candidates may be made available

for the perusal of this Court along with the memo of the learned

Sr.Government Pleader. So also, both sides will apprise this Court as to

whether the provisions contained in the Persons with Disabilities (Equal

Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995,

(Central Act 1 of 1996) as repealed and replaced by the subsequent Central

enactment as per the Rights of Persons With Disabilities Act, 2016 (Central

Act, 49 of 2016) framed by the Parliament would apply for lateral

reservation of physically disabled candidates for employment in Co-

operative Societies like the respondent Co-operative Society and whether

such a Co-operative Society would fulfil the definition of establishment as Writ Appeal No.1537 of 2021

per Section 2(k) (Government Establishment) as understood in the 2016

Act etc. In other words, both sides may address this Court as to whether

the provisions of the Central Enactments would govern the lateral and

horizontal reservation of PD candidates' employment in Co-operative

Societies like the 1st respondent Co-operative Societies, if not whether the

source for prescription of such lateral and horizontal reservation of PD

candidates is governed by the provisions contained in Section 80(5) of the

Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 as intoduced by amendment made

effective from 28.04.2010 and which is the authority who is competent to

perform the task of identification of posts suitable for such lateral

reservation. In other words, whether it is the Government in the Social

Justice Department or whether such power could be exercised by the Co-

operative Department etc in the case of such reservations covered by

Section 80(5) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.

4. The 1st respondent will explain to this Court as to whether the

probationary appointment of the writ appellant has been terminated, in

due compliance with the requirements of Rule 184(3) of the Kerala Co-

operative Society Rules or whether there is any contravention of the said

provisions as alleged by the petitioner, inasmuch as it is averred that the

prior approval of a notified Registrar has not been obtained in that regard Writ Appeal No.1537 of 2021

as mandated in Section 184(3) proviso.

5. In the meanwhile it is ordered that the 1 st respondent shall not

fill up the post of LD clerk earlier occupied by the writ appellant by any

method of appointment otherwise than by accommodating the writ

appellant.

List this case in the admission list on 06.12.2021.

Handover to both sides.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE

Sd/-

                                                   VIJU ABRAHAM
                                                        JUDGE
  Nsd




23-11-2021                      /True Copy/                           Assistant Registrar
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter