Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22624 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 28TH KARTHIKA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1476 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 21599/2009 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/LRS' OF PETITIONER IN WPC, LRS' OF RESPONDENT IN WA &
LRS' OF RESPONDENT IN RP:
1 THULASIBHAI KUNJAMMA
AGED 65 YEARS
D/O K.SOUDHAMINI KUNJAMMA,
MOUTTATH THULASIBHAVAN,
THUVAYOOR VADAKKE MURI,
EARATH VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, MANAKKALA P.O,
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-691551.
2 GEETHA PRASANNAKUMAR @ GEETHA DEVI
AGED 62 YEARS
D/O K.SOUDHAMINI KUNJAMMA,
MOUTTATH THULASIBHAVAN,
THUVAYOOR VADAKKE MURI,
EARATH VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, MANAKKALA P.O,
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-691551.
NOW RESIDIGN AT "POURNAMI", INDIRA ROAD, PONEKKAKARA,
EDAPPALLI, KOCHI-682024.
3 RAMESH KUMAR
AGED 55 YEARS
S/O K.SOUDHAMINI KUNJAMMA.,
MOUTTATH THULASIBHAVAN,
THUVAYOOR VADAKKE MURI,
EARATH VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK,
MANAKKALA P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-691551.
BY ADVS.
R.PARTHASARATHY
B.KRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS/2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC/2ND APPELLANT IN WA/2ND
PETITIONER IN RP:
DR.DIVYA S.IYER, I.A.S.
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1476 OF 2021
2
DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
(FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER'S),
CIVIL STATION,
PATHANAMTHITTA-689645.
SR.HANIL KUMAR.SPL.G.P
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 19.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1476 OF 2021
3
JUDGMENT
The allegations of the petitioners in this
contempt case are that the directions in the
judgment of this Court have not been complied
with, even though it was delivered as early as
in January, 2012; and though the appeal against
it was dismissed in that year itself.
2. The learned Special Government Pleader
- Sri.Hanilkumar, however, submitted that a
Special Leave Petition (SLP) was attempted
against the judgment in question before the
Hon'ble Supreme Court, but conceded that same
has now been dismissed. He, therefore, prayed
for a month's time to comply with the
directions in the judgment.
3. I am afraid that the time now sought
for by the respondent is grossly in excess
because, as rightly stated by Sri.Parthasarathy
- learned counsel for the petitioners, the CON.CASE(C) NO. 1476 OF 2021
judgment was delivered nearly 10 years ago.
4. I am, therefore, of the firm view that
the directions of this Court must be complied
with within a period of two weeks from the date
of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Resultantly, this contempt case is closed,
directing the respondent to comply with the
directions in the judgment within a period of
two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of
this judgment; failing which, petitioners will
be at liberty to seek a rehearing of this
contempt case at the end of the said term.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE SAS/19/11/2021 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1476 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1476/2021
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURE
Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP C NO.36718/2009 DATED 5/1/2012.
Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFTS ALONG WITH THE LETTER ENCLOSED TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DATED 16.02.2012.
Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DATED 16.02.2012.
Annexure A4 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGEMNT IN WRIT APPEAL NO.919/2012 DATED 14.06.2012.
Annexure A5 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN R.P.940/2012 AGAINST JUDGMENT IN W.A.919/2012 DATED 28/04/2020.
Annexure A6 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 2/7/2021.
Annexure A7 TRUE COPY OF THE LEGAL HEIR-SHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR , ADOOR DATED 30.11.2020.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!