Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Narayanan vs Rouf T.P
2021 Latest Caselaw 22006 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22006 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2021

Kerala High Court
K.Narayanan vs Rouf T.P on 3 November, 2021
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 12TH KARTHIKA,
                             1943
                    MACA NO. 1689 OF 2012
 AGAINST THE AWARD IN OP(MV) 502/2006 OF MOTOR ACCIDENTS
                  CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KASARAGOD
APPELLANT/PETITIONER    :

           K.NARAYANAN,
           AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.KUNHAMBU NAMBI K.,
           214, KALIYANTHIL HOUSE,
           KARIVELLUR VILLAGE, VADAKKUMPADU P.O.,
           THALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT.
           BY ADVS.
           SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS
           SMT.P.K.PRIYA
           SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :

    1      ROUF T.P.,
           AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.EBRAHIM,
           KUNNATHIL VALAPPU, PULATHIL PALLI,
           MATTANNUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT,
           PIN - 670702.
    2      K.V. PRAMOD, S/O.T.V.NARAYANAN,
           PRASADALAYAM, MAZTTANNUR P.O.,
           KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 702.
    3      THE BRANCH MANAGER,
           UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY,
           THALASSERY BRANCH, ASHEEQUA TOWER,
           MATANGAPUTAIN, THALASSERY, PIN-670101.
           BY SRI.MATHEWS JACOB, SR.STANDING COUNSEL
           SRI.JACOB MATHEW, STANDING COUNSEL

        THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 03.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 M.A.C.A.No.1689 of 2012                    ..2..




                        M.A.C.A.No.1689 of 2012
          -------------------------------------------------------
                              JUDGMENT

The petitioner in OP(MV)No.502 of 2006 on the file

of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kasaragod is the

appellant and he impugns award dated 03.05.2011 in the

above case.

2. The petitioner, who sustained injuries in an

accident happened on 04.11.2005, while riding a motorcycle

bearing registration No.KL-13G-8032 from Cheruvathur to

Kalikkadavu, was alleged to be hit down by a tempo trax

bearing registration No. KL-13 J-0470 driven by the first

respondent came from the opposite direction. Alleging

negligence on the part of the first respondent, the petitioner

approached the Tribunal and claimed Rs.10,00,000/- as

compensation.

3. Heard the learned counsel on both sides.

4. The third respondent insurance company filed M.A.C.A.No.1689 of 2012 ..3..

written statement and admitted the policy and also disputed

the accident as well as the negligence.

5. The learned Tribunal tried two cases jointly

viz.,O.P.(MV)Nos.501 of 2006 and 502 of 2006 (both petitioners

are travellers in the motorcycle) and granted Rs.4,51,807/- as

compensation to the appellant.

6. The appellant, who is aggrieved on the ground

of inadequacy, has approached this Court.

7. The learned counsel for the appellant would

submit that the Tribunal considered Rs.3,000/- alone as the

income for fixing disability income taking note of the fact that

the appellant is a regular employee in Government service. It

is submitted further that in MACA No.1673 of 2012 arising out

of connected OP(MV)No.501 of 2006 of MACT, Kasaragod, this

Court as per judgment dated 24.01.2018, fixed Rs.4,500/- as

the monthly income for assessing disability income therefore,

the same treatment is to be given to the appellant also.

8. Though the learned counsel for the insurance

company raised dispute regarding entitlement of disability M.A.C.A.No.1689 of 2012 ..4..

income in the case of a permanent employee, in view of the

judgment in MACA No.1673 of 2012 arising of connected O.P.

(MV)No. 501 of 2006, the same treatment required to be given

to the appellant also not as a precedent. Therefore, I am

inclined to re-fix the disability income after fixing Rs.4,500/-

per month as the monthly income.

9. Regarding the disability of the appellant,

Ext.X2 is the medical disability certificate issued by the District

Medical Board of Kanhangad. As per Ext.X2, the permanent

disability is assessed as 14% while showing the limb disability

as 31%.

10. In paragraph 28 of the award, the learned

Tribunal after narrating the recitals in Ext.X2 fixed 22%

disability without giving any explanation. However, the

percentage of disability fixed at 22% by the Tribunal is not

under challenge. Therefore, I am not inclined to revisit 22%

disability fixed by the Tribunal, though the procedure adopted

is found to be incorrect. Thus, the loss of disability income is

calculated as under;

M.A.C.A.No.1689 of 2012 ..5..

4500x12x15x22% = 1,78,200/-

Out of which, Rs.1,18,800/- was granted by the

Tribunal. Rs.178200-Rs.1,18,800= Rs.59,400/- more is

granted under the head loss of disability income. This

disability is fixed not as a precedent, but by following the

procedure adopted in connected MACA No.1673 of 2012. The

learned counsel canvassed increase under the head loss of

amenities also. Having noticed the injuries viz., proximal

phalanoe of middle finger & right ring finger(R), comminuted

fracture (R) tibia, diastasis of public symphasis, comminuted

fracture frontal bone with large area of pheumo Cephalus in

bilateral frontal region, Cerebral Ocdema, Maxillary

haemosiness, fracture ® temporal bone, extra peritoneal

bladder injury. Now he has got limitaton (R) hip knee & ankle

motion, affected stability of (R) lower limb, 1 cm shortening of

right lower limb, I am of the view that Rs.20,000/- under the

head loss of amenities can also be granted. Thus, the

appellant is entitled to get enhanced compensation to the tune

of Rs.79,400/-.

M.A.C.A.No.1689 of 2012 ..6..

In the result, this appeal is allowed in part. It is

ordered that the appellant is entitled to get enhanced

compensation to the tune of Rs.79,400/-(Rupees Seventy

Nine Thousand Four Hundred only) at the rate of 8% interest

granted by the Tribunal from the date of petition till the date of

deposit or realisation excluding the period of 364 days

wherein, grant of interest was specifically disallowed by the

order in C.M.Application No.1998 of 2012 dated 21.08.2012.

The insurance company is directed to deposit the same in the

name of the appellant within two months from today. On

deposit, the appellant can release the same.

Sd/-

                                      A.BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE
rkj
 M.A.C.A.No.1689 of 2012             ..7..




                               APPENDIX



PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE A1               TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE
                          ISSUED BY KMC HOSPITAL, MANGALORE
                          DATED 30.05.2012
ANNEXURE A2               TRUE COPY OF THE BILLS ISSUED BY KMC
                          HOSPITAL, MANGALORE DATED 30.05.12.
ANNEXURE A3               TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY
                          KMC HOSPITAL, MANGALORE DATED
                          25.05.2007
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter