Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr.K.Subramanya Bhat vs Travancore And Cochin Medical ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 12645 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12645 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2021

Kerala High Court
Dr.K.Subramanya Bhat vs Travancore And Cochin Medical ... on 31 May, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
     MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2021 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1943
                       WP(C) NO. 11413 OF 2021
PETITIONER:

          DR.K.SUBRAMANYA BHAT
0




          AGED 57 YEARS
          S/O.LATE DR.K.K.BHAT, SHRIVARI HOUSE, MAVUNGAL,
          KANHANGAD, KASARGOD DISTRICT.

          BY ADVS.
          SURESH KUMAR KODOTH
          K.P.ANTONY BINU



RESPONDENTS:

    1     TRAVANCORE AND COCHIN MEDICAL COUNCIL
          REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, RED CROSS ROAD,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 035.

    2     THE NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION
          REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, POCKET-14 SECTOR-8, DWARAKA
          PHASE-1, NEW DELHI - 110 077.

    3     THE UNION OF INDIA
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND
          FAMILY WELFARE, NEW DELHI - 110 001.

    4     DR.T.V.PADMANABHAN
          THEKKEVEETTIL, LAKSHMI NAGAR, KANHANGAD, KASARGOD
          DISTRICT - 671 315.


THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.05.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.11413 of 2021

                            ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
                         ----------------
                        W.P.(C) No.11413 of 2021
                        ------------------
                    Dated this the 31st day of May, 2021


                                  JUDGMENT

1. This writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P26 order issued by

the 1st respondent and seeking a further declaration that the

petitioner is entitled to practice as Sonologist and conduct

an ultrasound clinic in accordance with registration under

the provisions of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal

Diagnostic Techniques Act, Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal

Diagnostic Techniques Rules and the Pre-Conception and

Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex

Selection) (Six Months Training) Rules, 2014.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned

standing counsel appearing for the 1st respondent, the

learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and the learned ASGI

appearing for the 3rd respondent. Notice to the 4 th

respondent is dispensed with, in view of the directions being

issued.

W.P.(C) No.11413 of 2021

3. The petitioner contends that Ext.P26 order is vitiated by

bias and prejudice, and that it cannot survive in the light of

the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques

(Prohibition of Sex Selection) (Six Months Training) Rules,

2014 and Ext.P11 interim order of the Apex Court. Reliance

is placed on Rule 3.3 of the Rules to contend that the

petitioner is eligible to use the title 'Consultant Sonologist',

since he is a medical practitioner having undergone training

in ultra sonology and having long experience in the field.

4. The learned standing counsel appearing for the 1 st

respondent submits that Ext.P26 is an appealable order and

as the contentions urged in challenge to the order are

substantially on the merits of the matter, it is only

appropriate that the petitioner be relegated to the appellate

remedy available before the 2nd respondent.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the 2 nd respondent

submits that appeals are being accepted online by the 2 nd

respondent and the matter can be considered by the 2 nd

respondent in accordance with law.

W.P.(C) No.11413 of 2021

6. Having considered the contentions advanced on all sides, I

am of the opinion that this is a fit case where the petitioner

is to be required to approach the appellate authority, that is

the 2nd respondent, in terms of the Indian Medical Council

(Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations,

2002.

7. In the above view of the matter, there will be a direction

that in case the petitioner submits an appeal before the 2nd

respondent, online, within a week from the date of receipt

of a copy of this judgment, the appeal shall be considered,

at least for the purpose of interim orders, within ten days

thereafter. The petitioner shall be put on notice and heard

by any appropriate means, including through video

conferencing before orders are passed within ten days, as

directed above. The publication and implementation of

Ext.P26 impugned order shall be kept in abeyance for a

period of three weeks to enable the filing of the appeal and

the consideration of the interim relief by the 2nd respondent.

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

sd/-

       sj                                    ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE
 W.P.(C) No.11413 of 2021


                           APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11413/2021

ANNEXURE/EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1                   TRUE COPIES OF THE DEGREE CERTIFICATE

AWARDED IN THE YEAR 1987 FROM KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE, IN MANGALORE UNIVERSITY.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF ENROLLMENT ON THE ROLL OF THE KARNATAKA MEDICAL COUNCIL ON 08.03.1988.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION DATED 25.07.2007.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING SCIENCES.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF OBG ON ADVANCED TECHNIQUES ON OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF DIPLOMA IN ULTRASONOGRAPHY FROM ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE EXAMINATION HELD IN MAY 2011.

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PG DIPLOMA CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY IN HEALTH SCIENCE IN ECHO CARDIOLOGRAPHY.

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE WITH REG NO.27066 ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA.

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION UNDER PNDT ACT,1994.

Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 14.03.2018 IN SLP (C) NOS.16657-16659 OF THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT.

Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 02.07.2008 IN WPC.19948/2008.

Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.08.2008 W.P.(C) No.11413 of 2021

ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19/12/2013 IN WPC 30366/2018.

Exhibit P15 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20.09.2019 ISSUED BY IMA TO 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P16 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22/04/2019 ISSUED BY IMA TO 5TH RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P17 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 03.04.2019 FILED BY 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P18 TRUE COPY OF COVERING LETTER DATED 23.09.2019 ENCLOSING STATEMENT AND ARGUMENT NOTES.

Exhibit P19 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 22.10.2019 IN WPC NO.26536/2019.

Exhibit P20 TRUE COPY OF NOTES OF HEARING DATED 16.11.2019.

Exhibit P21 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 20.08.2020 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

Exhibit P22 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 23.09.2020 IN WPC NO.19640/2020.

Exhibit P23 TRUE COPY OF THE RECOMMENDATION DATED 16.11.2019 OF THE ETHICS COMMITTEE WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

Exhibit P24 TRUE COPY OF THE MODERN COUNCIL, DATED 03.07.2020 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

Exhibit P25 TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 14.10.2020.

Exhibit P26 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 17/05/2021 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT WITH ENGLISH TRANALATION.

True copy

Ps to Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter