Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12418 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 21ST VAISAKHA, 1943
WP(C).No.10580 OF 2021(V)
PETITIONER/S:
1 JAISON P.C.
AGED 47 YEARS
S/O. CHACKO, PULIYILAKKAL, MURIKKUMKUNDU, AASARIKKAD
P.O. 670 751 THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2 MRUDALA RAMACHANDRAN
POTTANATH HOUSE, IRAVIMANGALAM P.O.,-680751 THRISSUR
DISTRICT.
3 E.P.SUDHAKARAN
EDATHARA HOUSE, MULAYAM AYYAPPANKAVU P.O.,-680 751
THRISSUR DISTRICT.
4 JALAJA RAMACHANDRAN
THATTAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALAKKAVU, MULAYAM P.O.-680
751 THRISSUR DISTRICT.
5 M.L.BABY
MADATHUMPADI HOUSE, ERAVIMANGALAM P.O.-680751,
THRISSUR DISTRICT.
6 T.C.ARJUNAN
THATTAPARAMBIL, THATTAPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOCHETTI,
NADATHARA P.O.,-680 751 THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.M.SASINDRAN
SRI.S.SHYAM KUMAR
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-
OPERATION SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
(GENERAL)
THRISSUR-680 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
WP(C).No.10580 OF 2021(V)
2
GP MABLE C KURIEN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.05.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.10580 OF 2021(V)
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of May 2021
Admit.
The Government Pleader takes notice for the
respondents. Heard Sri M.Sasindran on behalf of the
petitioners and the Government Pleader on behalf of the
respondents.
2. The petitioners are members of the Committee of
the Nadathara Farmers Service Co-operative Bank Ltd
No.3499. It is stated that they were members of the previous
committee also. The 2nd respondent issued Ext.P1 order on
31.12.2020 under Section 68(2) of the Kerala Co-operative
Societies Act imposing surcharge on each of the petitioners to
the extent of Rs.5,10,474/-. The allegation against the
petitioners is that a construction was carried out violating the
stop order issued by the Registrar. The petitioners submit that
there is no allegation that any excess expenditure was made
for the construction of the building. Aggrieved by the order of WP(C).No.10580 OF 2021(V)
the 2nd respondent, the petitioners have preferred Exhibit P2
statutory appeal and along with the Exhibit P2 appeal they
have also filed Exhibit P3 petition seeking stay of further
proceedings pursuant to Exhibit P1. The grievance of the
petitioners is that the appeal and the stay petition are not
being disposed of and in the meanwhile proceedings are being
initiated to implement Exhibit P1 order. The writ petition has
been filed, praying for a direction to the 1 st respondent to
consider Exhibit P2 appeal and pass appropriate orders and to
keep the coercive action pursuant to Exhibit P1 in abeyance.
It is seen from the appeal that Exhibit P1 order which is
dated 31.12.2020 was received by the petitioners only on
05.03.2021 and the appeal has been filed on 29.03.2021.
Considering the limited prayer made in the writ petition, the
writ petition is disposed of directing the 1 st respondent to
consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3 application for stay
and if possible Ext.P2 appeal at the earliest, at any rate within
6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The further proceedings pursuant to Exhibit P1 will be kept in WP(C).No.10580 OF 2021(V)
abeyance till disposal of Exhibit P3 stay petition as directed
above.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI
JUDGE WP(C).No.10580 OF 2021(V)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31.12.2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MADE BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR STAY PREFERRED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!